Skip to main content

Fake Review Prevention Using Classification and Authentication Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICT Systems and Sustainability

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1077))

Abstract

Day by day people shopping via E-commerce sites is burgeoning. Decision of placing orders relies on product and service reviews provided by the customers. The importance of the reviews has increased tremendously because they provide information about the quality of product and service. This stimulates sellers to exploit these reviews to increase their sales by deceiving the customers with false information. Thus, detection and prevention of fake reviews becomes pivotal. This paper focuses on detecting and preventing fake reviews using classification and authentication techniques. Review content and Reviewer behavior-based features were used to train different machine learning algorithms such as SVM, Random forest, and Decision tree; among these, Random forest classification algorithm had the highest accuracy of fake review detection with 73.33%. Prevention of fake reviews is achieved by making sure the right person gets to write the review by sending the review writing link to the registered email-id. This research is also concerned over preventing bots to write review by examining the keyboard and mouse activities of the machine. Captcha authentication method has been adopted to prevent bots from writing reviews.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Statista—Global retail e-commerce market size 2014–2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/worldwide-retail-e-commerce-sales/. Last accessed 6 May 2019

  2. Marketing Land—Sterling, G., Sterling, G.: Study finds 61 percent of electronics reviews on Amazon are ‘fake’. https://marketingland.com/study-finds-61-percent-of-electronics-reviews-on-amazon-are-fake-254055. Last accessed 11 May 2019

  3. Dwoskin, E., Timberg, C.: How merchants use Facebook to flood Amazon with fake reviews. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/how-merchants-secretly-use-facebook-to-flood-amazon-with-fake-reviews/2018/04/23/5dad1e30–4392-11e8-8569-26fda6b404c7_story.html. Last accessed 10 May 2019

  4. The Drum—Fullerton, L.: Online reviews impact purchasing decisions for over 93% of consumers, report suggests. https://www.thedrum.com/news/2017/03/27/online-reviews-impact-purchasing-decisions-over-93-consumers-report-suggests. Last accessed 11 May 2019

  5. von Helversen, B., Abramczuk, K., Kopeć, W., Nielek, R.: Influence of consumer reviews on online purchasing decisions in older and younger adults. Decis. Support Syst. 113, 1–10 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mukherjee, A., Venkataraman, V., Liu, B., Glance, N.: Fake review detection: classification and analysis of real and pseudo reviews. Technical report. UIC-C S-03–2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., Hancock, J.T.: Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In: ACL, pp. 309–319 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mukherjee, A., Kumar, A., Liu, B., et al.: Spotting opinion spammers using behavioral footprints. In: ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 632–640 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., Ipeirotis, P.G.: Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 5(5), 411–419 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, Y., Feng, X., Zhang, S.: Detecting fake reviews utilizing semantic and emotion model. In: 3rd International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering (ICISCE), pp. 317–320. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feng, S., Banerjee, R., Choi, Y.: Syntactic stylometry for deception detection. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers-Volume 2, pp. 171–175. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chowdhary, N.S., Pandit, A.A.: Fake review detection using classification. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 975, 8887

    Google Scholar 

  13. McAuley, J.: Amazon review data. http://jmcauley.ucsd.edu/data/amazon/links.html. Last accessed 17 April 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Prakash .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Prakash, P., Shashank, N., Arjun, M., Yadav, P.S.S., Shreyamsa, S.M., Prazwal, N.R. (2020). Fake Review Prevention Using Classification and Authentication Techniques. In: Tuba, M., Akashe, S., Joshi, A. (eds) ICT Systems and Sustainability. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1077. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0936-0_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics