Skip to main content

Policies to Mitigate Select Consequence of Social Media: Insights from India

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 473 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1077))

Abstract

Apart from the benefits to humanity, often, social media possess consequences such as online hate content, fake news, online abuse, cyber-bullying and other demeaning expressions. As the increased hate content causes several health issues, it is necessary to mitigate it. Hate content mitigation may attain sustainable development goals of United Nations. Therefore, the objective of the article is to identify the possible policies to mitigate social media consequence-online hate content. In this regard, online and offline opinions from the Indian respondents are gathered through the questionnaire designed for the purpose. The software which is developed in R programming language is used to analyse opinions. The analysis results reveal the role of government and non-government authorities for digital hate content reduction. The non-governmental communities-civil societies, private sectors, and intermediaries are more important to reduce digital hate content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amedie, J.: The Impact of Social Media on Society. Advanced Writing: Pop Culture Intersections 2. http://scholarcommons.scu.edu/engl_176/2 (2015)

  2. Kapoor, K.K., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N.P., Patil, P., Dwivedi, Y.K., Nerur, S.: Advances in social media research: past, present and future. Inf. Syst. Front. 20(3), 531–558 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shensa, A., Escobar-Viera, C.G., Sidani, J.E., Bowman, N.D., Marshal, M.P., Primack, B.A.: Problematic social media use and depressive symptoms among US young adults: a nationally-representative study. Soc. Sci. Med. 182, 150–157 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gillespie, T.: Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. Yale University Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caplan, R., Hanson, L., Donovan, J.: Dead reckoning navigating content moderation after “Fake News”. Data Soc. https://datasociety.net/output/dead-reckoning (2018)

  6. Mondal, M., Silva, L.A., Correa, D., Benevenuto, F.: Characterizing usage of explicit hate expressions in social media. New Rev. Hypermed. Multimed. 24(2), 1–21 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jubany, O., Roiha, M. (2016). Backgrounds, experiences and responses to online hate speech: a comparative cross-country analysis. Universitat de Barcelona. abs/1504.02305

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chetty, N., Alathur, S.: Hate speech review in the context of online social networks. Aggress. Violent. Beh. 40(3), 108–118 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Seglow, J.: Hate speech, dignity and self-respect. Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 19(5), 1103–1116 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen, R.: Regulating hate speech: nothing customary about it. Chi. J. Int’l L. 15, 229 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Braithwaite, J., Coglianese, C., Levi-Faur, D.: Can regulation and governance make a difference? Regul. Gov. 1(1), 1–7 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dutton, M.A., Green, B.L., Kaltman, S.I., Roesch, D.M., Zeffiro, T.A., Krause, E.D.: Intimate partner violence, PTSD, and adverse health outcomes. J. Interpers. Violence 21(7), 955–968 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Banks, J.: Regulating hate speech online. Int. Rev. Law Comput. Technol. 24(3), 233–239 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Penney, J.W.: Internet surveillance, regulation, and chilling effects online: a comparative case study. Internet Policy Rev. 6(2) (2017). https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.2.692

  15. Jenness, V.: The emergence, content, and institutionalization of hate crime law: How a diverse policy community produced a modern legal fact. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3, 141–160 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chetty, N., Alathur, S.: Racism and social media: a study in Indian context. Int. J. Web Based Commun. 15(1), 44–61 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dawson, A.: Love Music, Hate Racism: the cultural politics of the rock against racism campaigns. Postmod. Cult. 16(1) (2005). https://muse.jhu.edu/article/192260

  18. Kuntsman, A., Raji, S.: Israelis and Iranians: Get A Room!: Love, Hate, and transnational politics from the “Israel Loves Iran” and “Iran Loves Israel” Facebook campaigns. JMEWS: J. Middle East Women’s Stud. 8(3), 143–154 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arun, C., Nayak, N.: Preliminary Findings on Online Hate Speech and the Law in India. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication No. 2016–19 (2016). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2882238. Accessed 10 Jan 2019

  20. Breen, D., Nel, J.A.: South Africa-A home for all: the need for hate crime legislation. South Afr. Crime Q. 38, 33–43 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dharmapala, D., Garoupa, N.: Penalty enhancement for hate crimes: an economic analysis. Am. Law Econ. Rev. 6(1), 185–207 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Henry, J.S.: Beyond free speech: novel approaches to hate on the Internet in the United States. Inf. Commun. Technol. Law 18(2), 235–251 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gagliardone, I., Gal, D., Alves, T., Martinez, G.: Countering Online Hate Speech. Unesco Publishing, Paris (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schumacker, R.E., Lomax, R.G.: A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn. Routledge, New York (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanchez, G.: PLS path modeling with R. Berkeley: Trowchez Editions 383 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Miaou, S.P., Lu, A., Lum, H.S.: Pitfalls of using R2 to evaluate goodness of fit of accident prediction models. Transp. Res. Rec. 1542(1), 6–13 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shtatland, E.S., Kleinman, K., Cain, E.M.: One more time about R2 measures of fit in logistic regression. NESUG 15 Proc. 15, 222–226 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., Van Oppen, C.: Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Q. 33(1), 177–195 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naganna Chetty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chetty, N., Alathur, S. (2020). Policies to Mitigate Select Consequence of Social Media: Insights from India. In: Tuba, M., Akashe, S., Joshi, A. (eds) ICT Systems and Sustainability. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1077. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0936-0_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics