Skip to main content

Experimental Comparative Study on Strength Parameters of Concrete Assimilating Glass Fibers of Fine Aggregate, Cement with Rubber and GGBS

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computer Methods and Geomechanics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 55))

  • 1075 Accesses

Abstract

The utilization of fibers and waste materials from industry in concrete is making a remarkable change in properties of concrete. For the present study a comparison of effectiveness in strength properties when rubber, GGBS and silica fumes are used as a substitute for fine aggregate and cement respectively and alkali-resistant glass fibers are added in concrete. The effect of addition or replacement of fibers and materials on strength parameters are studied. Fine aggregate is replaced with crumb rubber and cement is also replaced with GGBS in addition to Silica fumes, as required target strength is not attained when fine aggregate is replaced with rubber. A maximum of 30% of replacement of rubber is done, depending upon the results, it is known that replacement of rubber should be restricted and low w/c ratios should be adopted. Simultaneously, in another mix glass fibers are added to plain concrete in varying percentages, maximum of 1.5%. It is observed that the use of glass fibers in concrete mixes increases tensile strength without affecting its compressive strength, thus making it beneficial to use glass fibers as there is significant increase in strength. Depending upon the percentage of replacement and addition six trial, mixes are adopted. The strength comparison is done between the six trial mixes with nominal mix of grade M25 and are presented here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Scrap Tires: Deflating a Growing Problem (1988) Compressed air magazine

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas BS, Gupta RC, Vinu JP (2016) Recycling of waste tire rubber as aggregate in concrete: durability-related performance. J Clean Prod 112(1):504–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shariq M, Prasad J, Masood A (2010) Effect of GGBFS on time dependent compressive strength of concrete. J Constr Build Mater 24(8):1469–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wroblewskia L, Hristozova D, Sadeghianb P (2016) Durability of bond between concrete beams and FRP composites made of flax and glass fibers. J Constr Build Mater 126(15):800–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawood ET, Mezal AM (2014) The properties of fiber reinforced gypsum plaster. J Sci Res Rep 3(10):1339–1347

    Google Scholar 

  6. Concrete and Aggregate (1988) Annual book of ASTM standards, vol 04.02, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guidelines for Using Recycled Tire Carcasses in Highway Maintenance (1987) Office of Transportation Laboratory, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, California

    Google Scholar 

  8. Payne AR, Scott JR (1960) The properties, testing and design of rubber as an engineering material. Inter-science Publishers, New York, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Popovics S (1987) A hypothesis concerning the effects of macro-porosity on mechanical properties of concrete. In: Proceedings of the SEM/RELIM international conference on fracture of concrete and rock. Springer, New York, pp 170–174

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grade Ordinary Portland Cement (1989) IS 8112—Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  11. Code for Concrete Mix Proportioning (2009) IS 10262—Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  12. Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code or Practice (Fourth Revision) (2000) IS 456—Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  13. Specification for Coarse and Fine Aggregate from Natural Sources for Concrete (Second Revision) (1970) IS 383—Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  14. Indian Standard Concrete Admixture Specification (1999) IS 9103—Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  15. Methods of Tests for Strength of Concrete (1959) IS 516—Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is mainly carried out receiving the financial support from the DST-SERB, GOI under sanction no. ECR/2016/001329.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naveen Kumar Vanapalli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sil, A., Vanapalli, N.K., Kumari, A., Gogoi, P., Mojumder, D. (2020). Experimental Comparative Study on Strength Parameters of Concrete Assimilating Glass Fibers of Fine Aggregate, Cement with Rubber and GGBS. In: Prashant, A., Sachan, A., Desai, C. (eds) Advances in Computer Methods and Geomechanics . Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 55. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0886-8_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0886-8_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0885-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0886-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics