Skip to main content

Effect of Geosynthetic Stiffness on the Behaviour of Encased Stone Columns Installed in Lithomargic Clay

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 55))

Abstract

Columnar systems have been extensively used to support structures on problematic ground conditions. Encased stone columns are very effective for flexible structures such as embankments and storage tanks where a relatively large settlement is permissible. Lithomargic clay is extensively found along the Konkan belt in peninsular India and serves as the foundation for most of the structures. Construction activities in lithomargic clays are challenging due to the fact that there occurs drastic reduction in strength under saturated conditions. In this paper, the effectiveness of encased stone column in lithomargic clay has been studied and a 3D column model was developed to examine the effect of geosynthetic stiffness on the column-load-carrying capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ambily AP, Gandhi SR (2007) behaviour of stone columns based on experimental and FEM analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(4):405–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barksdale RD, Bachus RC (1983) Design and construction of stone columns. Federal highway administration: RD-83/026

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biot MA (1941) General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12(2):155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Castro J (2017) Groups of encased stone columns: influence of column length and arrangement. Geotext Geomembr 45(2):68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang J, Han J, Oztoprak S (2009) Coupled mechanical and hydraulic modelling of geosynthetic-reinforced column-supported embankments. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(80):1011–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jayamohan J, Shivashankar R (2012) Some studies on prestressed reinforced granular beds overlying weak soil. ISRN Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/436327

  7. Lo SR, Zhang R, Mak J (2010) Geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft clay: a numerical study. Geotext Geomembr 28(3):292–302

    Google Scholar 

  8. Malarvizhi SN, Ilamparuthi K (2004) Load versus settlement of claybed stabilized with stone and reinforced stone columns. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Asian regional conference on geosynthetics, GEOASIA, Seoul, Korea, pp 322–329

    Google Scholar 

  9. Majjagi G, Hiremath SG (2013) Experimental investigation of stone column in shedi soil. Int J Eng Res Tech 2(10):1669–1673

    Google Scholar 

  10. Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2007) Model tests on geosynthetic-encased stone columns. Geosynth Int 14(6):346–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2010) Studies on the behavior of single and group of geosynthetic encased granular columns. Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(1):129–139

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nayak S, Babu MRD, Shivashankar R, James N (2014) Performance of granular column in dispersive soils. ICE Proc 167:72–82

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raithel M, Kempfert HG, Kirchner A (2002) Geotextile-encased columns (GEC) for foundation of a dike on very soft soils. In: Proceedings 7th ICG international conference on geosynthetics, Nice, France, pp 1025–1028

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ravi Shankar AU, Suresha SN (2006) Strength behaviour of geogrid reinforced shedi soil sub grade and aggregate system. Road Mater Pavement Des 7(3):313–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Impe WY, De Beer E (1985) Improvement of settlement behaviour of soft layers by means of stone columns. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on SMFE, Helsinki, pp 309–312

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yoo C, Kim SB (2009) Numerical modeling of geosynthetic-encased stone column-reinforced ground. Geosynth Int 16(3):116–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang R, Lo SR (2008) Analysis of geosynthetic reinforced stone columns in soft clay. In: Proceedings of the 4th Asian regional conference on geosynthetics, Shanghai, China, pp 735–740

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. P. Vibhoosha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vibhoosha, M.P., Bhasi, A., Nayak, S. (2020). Effect of Geosynthetic Stiffness on the Behaviour of Encased Stone Columns Installed in Lithomargic Clay. In: Prashant, A., Sachan, A., Desai, C. (eds) Advances in Computer Methods and Geomechanics . Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 55. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0886-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0886-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0885-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0886-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics