Abstract
Society and standards require more and more “risk-informed” decisions. The paper demonstrates the potential of reducing risk by implementing reliability and risk concepts as a complement to conventional analyses. Reliability evaluations can range from qualitative estimates, simple statistical evaluations to full quantitative probabilistic modelling of the hazards and consequences. The paper first introduced recent innovative developments that help reduce risk. Risk assessment and risk management are briefly touched upon. An example of the application of the new stress testing method is given. The usefulness of the seminal (1969) Observational Method is discussed. The need for developing sustainable and holistic civil engineering solutions is also briefly mentioned. The paper concludes that reliability-based approaches provide useful complementary information, and enable the analysis of complex uncertainties in a systematic and more complete manner than deterministic analyses alone. There is today a cultural shift in the approach for design and risk reduction in our profession. Reliability and risk-based approaches will assist preparing sustainable engineering recommendations and making risk-informed decisions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ho, K.K.S., Lacasse, S. and Picarelli, L. (2017). Slope Safety Preparedness for Climate Change Effects. Taylor & Francis. London. 572 pp.
Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J. and Simonyan, K. (2017). Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature. 550. 354‒359 (19 Oct. 2017).
Corominas, J., van Westen, C. Frattini, P., Cascini, L., Malet, J.P., Fotopoulou, S, Catani, F., Van Den Eeckhaut, M., Mavrouli, O., Agliardi, F., Pitilakis, K., Winter, M.G., Pastor, M., Ferlisi, S., Tofani, V., Hervás, J. and Smith, J.T. (2014). Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull. Engineering Geology and the Environment. 73 (2). 209‒263. May 2014.
Nature (2017): Natural language. Nature. Editorial. 541 (12 Jan. 2017) 133‒134.
Peck, R.B. (1969). Advantages and Limitations of the Observational Method in Applied Soil Mechanics. Géotechnique. 19 (1) 171‒187.
Zhang, S., Zhang, L., Lacasse, S., & Nadim, F. (2016). Evolution of Mass Movements near Epicentre of Wenchuan Earthquake, the First Eight Years. Nature. Scientific Reports. 6. 36154. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36154.
Zhang, L., Gao, L., Zhou, S., Cheung, R.W.M and Lacasse, S (2017). Stress Testing Framework for Managing Landslide Risks under Extreme Storms. 4th World Landslide Forum. Ljubljana. Slovenia. pp. 17-32. http://hdl.handle.net/1783.1/85575.
ISO2394:2015. General principles on reliability for structures. ISO/TC 98/SC 2. 111 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lacasse, S. (2020). Innovation Reduces Risk for Sustainable Infrastructure. In: Ha-Minh, C., Dao, D., Benboudjema, F., Derrible, S., Huynh, D., Tang, A. (eds) CIGOS 2019, Innovation for Sustainable Infrastructure. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 54. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0802-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0802-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0801-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0802-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)