Abstract
In civil engineering, a seismic fragility curve is popularly used to predict failure probability of structures under different earthquakes, and hence propose essential rehabilitation strategies through risk assessment for future earthquakes. The curve shows the failure probability as a function of seismic intensity, e.g., spectral acceleration at fundamental frequencies of structures (Sa, T1), and can be obtained using one of three approaches: engineering judgment, empirical studies or numerical simulations. The paper focuses on constructing seismic fragility curves using numerical simulations, where robust approaches of seismic reliability analysis are based on direct Monte Carlo simulation technique. The MCS based method usually requires a relatively large number of simulations to obtain a sufficiently reliable estimate of the fragility. It therefore becomes computationally expensive and time consuming as generating the simulations using the actual model or called full model of the structure. In this regard, this paper suggests using Kriging metamodel as a viable alternative of the actual model to reduce computational costs in seismic fragility computation. The Kriging metamodel is constructed based on the training samples of input and corresponding output responses of the structure. The validation of this method is performed on two numerical examples.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
B. Ellingwood. Validation studies of seismic PRAs. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 123, (1990), pp. 189–196.
T.-P. Le, C.-T. Dang, and P. Ray. A comparative study of construction methods for seismic fragility curves using numerical simulations. Mechanics and Industry, 17, (6), (2016), p. 12.
Cressie, Noel. “Spatial prediction and ordinary kriging.” Mathematical geology 20.4 (1988): 405-421.
Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J., & Wynn, H. P. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statistical science, (1989): 409-423.
D. M. Boore. Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 160, (3), (2003), pp. 635–676.
C. Kafali and M. Grigoriu. Seismic fragility analysis: Application to simple linear and non- linear systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36, (13), (2007), pp. 1885–1900.
Stone, M. ‘Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36(2), (1974), pp. 111–147.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training under the research project No. B2018.DNA.01.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dang, CT., Tran, T., Nguyen, DM., Pham, M., Le, TP. (2020). Use of Kriging metamodels for seismic fragility analysis of structures. In: Ha-Minh, C., Dao, D., Benboudjema, F., Derrible, S., Huynh, D., Tang, A. (eds) CIGOS 2019, Innovation for Sustainable Infrastructure. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 54. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0802-8_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0802-8_45
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0801-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0802-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)