Skip to main content

Numerical Analysis of Variations on Design Modifications of Train and Tunnel Geometries to Reduce Aerodynamic Drag on Train

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 630 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

The flow of air around the train in a confined space, i.e., tunnel is different than that of the train moving in an open air. As the train passes through a tunnel, there is a large amount of aerodynamic drag force exerted on the body of the train. There is a compression of the air ahead of the train inside a tunnel due to which large pressure is produced ahead of a train while just behind the tail there is a suction of air due to low pressure at the tail end of the train. The train inside a confined space in a tunnel behaves just like a loosely fitted piston inside a cylinder. Thus, in order to reduce the drag force, train head and tail geometries are modified. This analysis has been done on ANSYS Fluent 14.0 and steady Navier–Stokes (N-S) equations for two-dimensional, axi-symmetric, incompressible flow using standard k-ε turbulence modeling was solved with the help of Fluent 14.0 software to simulate the flow around the train passing inside a tunnel. In this analysis, two observations are done: first, tunnel width, i.e., blockage ratio has been changed from 0.25 to 0.36 (tunnel width from 6 to 5 m) and variation of drag force with the blockage ratio is analyzed. Second, train head and tail geometries are changed to see the variation of drag force on blunt and hemispherical head and tail of the train. This paper suggests that a less blockage ratio is responsible for less drag force on the train. A similar investigation has been performed by taking different shapes of head and tail of the train keeping the blockage ratio same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baker C, Quinn A, Sima M, Hoefener L, Licciardello R (2013) Full-scale measurement and analysis of train slipstreams and wakes: part 1 ensemble averages. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cross D, Hughes B, Ingham D, Ma L (2017) Enhancing the piston effect in underground railway tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baron A, Molteni P, Vigevano L (2006) High-speed trains: prediction of micro-pressure wave radiation from tunnel portals. J Sound Vib 296:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mossi M, Sibilla S (2002) Swiss-metro: aerodynamic drag and wave effects in tunnels under partial vacuum

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang Y, Gao W (2010) A numerical study of the train-induced unsteady airflow in a subway tunnel with natural ventilation ducts using the dynamic layering method. J Hydrodyn 22(2):164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Y (2012) Numerical simulation and analysis of aerodynamic drag on a subsonic train in evacuated tube transportation. J Mod Transp 20(1):44–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JY, Kim KY (2007) Experimental and numerical analyses of train-induced unsteady tunnel flow in subway. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 22:166–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiang X, Xue L (2010) Tunnel hood effects on high speed train compression wave. J Hydrodyn 22(5) Supplement:940–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baron A, Mossi M, Sibilla S (2001) The alleviation of the aerodynamic drag and wave effects of high-speed trains in very long tunnels. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 89:365–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pandey BK, Mukherjea SK (2014) Aerodynamic simulation of evacuated tube transport trains with suction at tail. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The analysis is supported by CAD Laboratory of the Department of Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mechanics of Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah, West Bengal, 711103, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vaibhav Rastogi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rastogi, V., Nandi, N. (2020). Numerical Analysis of Variations on Design Modifications of Train and Tunnel Geometries to Reduce Aerodynamic Drag on Train. In: Maity, D., Siddheshwar, P., Saha, S. (eds) Advances in Fluid Mechanics and Solid Mechanics. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0772-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0772-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0771-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0772-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics