Skip to main content

Daily Life of the Aged: An Analysis of Time-Use Diaries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The study of how people spend their time constitutes a major theme of research in social science disciplines such as anthropology, sociology, economics, and social psychology (Bolger et al. 2003; Juster et al. 2003). Such studies, going back to the beginning of the twentieth century, employ a wide range of methodologies for collecting data on time use. Such methods include direct observational approaches such as the shadowing method (Quinlan 2008) to the experience sampling method that invites respondents to record their activity at random points during the day (Csikszentmihalyi and Larson 1987; Zuzanek 2013). In recent years, time-use diaries (TUD) have emerged as a reliable and accurate data collection instrument to obtain information on the activity patterns of large populations (Robinson and Godbey 1999; Michelson 2005). After the large-scale Multinational Time Budget Research Project conducted in the 1960s (Robinson et al. 1972), a considerable number of countries, from developed to developing countries, began funding national time use surveys on a regular basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Both differences are statistically significant: t = 5.2672 and = −4.4728, respectively, for economic activities and extended SNA activities, with p = 0.0 in both cases.

  2. 2.

    The difference is also statistically insignificant, as t = 0.7939 (p = 0.4276).

  3. 3.

    The difference is statistically significant, with t = 1.7138 9p = 0.0436).

  4. 4.

    Given t = 1.9538(p = 0.0256) the difference is again statistically significant.

References

  • Ainsworth, Susan. 2001. Discourse analysis as social construction : Towards greater integration of approaches and methods. In Second international critical management studies conference, 26. Julio 11–13. Manchester School of Management. UMIST: UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Ben. 2016. Laundry, energy and time: Insights from 20 years of time-use diary data in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 22: 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2016.09.004. Elsevier.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Ben, and Karina Tracey. 2002. Digital living: The impact (or otherwise) of the internet on everyday British life. In The internet in everyday life, 139–163. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470774298.ch4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bejerholm, Ulrika, and Mona Eklund. 2008. Time use and occupational performance among persons with schizophrenia. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health 20: 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1300/J004v20n01_02. Taylor & Francis Group.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, Niall, Angelina Davis, and Eshkol Rafaeli. 2003. Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology 54: 579–616. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030. Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way, P.O. Box 10139, Palo Alto, CA 94303–0139, USA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzitheochari, Stella, Kimberly Fisher, Emily Gilbert, Lisa Calderwood, Tom Huskinson, Andrew Cleary, and Jonathan Gershuny. 2018. Using new technologies for time diary data collection: Instrument design and data quality findings from a mixed-mode pilot survey. Social Indicators Research 137: 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1569-5. Springer Netherlands.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corti, Louise. 1993. Using diaries in social research. Social Research Update.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., and R. Larson. 1987. Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 175: 526–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Kimberly, Muriel Egerton, Jonathan I. Gershuny, and John P. Robinson. 2007. Gender convergence in the Americal Heritage Time Use Study (AHTUS). Social Indicators Research 82: 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9017-y. NIH Public Access.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, Robin, and A. Spellerberg. 1999. Using time use data. A history of time use surveys and uses of time use data. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Linda J., Sheena Elwick, Claire D. Vallotton, and Gregor Kappler. 2014. Spending time with others: A time-use diary for infant-toddler child care. In Lived spaces of infant-toddler education and care, 59–74. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8838-0_5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hektner, Joel M., Jennifer A. Schmidt, and Csikszentmihalyi Mihaly. 2007. Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hirway, Indira. 1998. Time use studies: Conceptual and methodological issues with reference to the Indian time use survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. India’s time use data show women spend 69.03 hours on total work, men spend 62.71 hours. Blog posted on 17 April. Accessed on 6 May 2018 from https://bit.ly/2ICeRyQ.

  • Hunt, Eithne, and Elizabeth Anne McKay. 2015. What can be learned from adolescent time diary research. Journal of Adolescent Health 56: 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, Devaki, and Malini Chand. 1982. Report on a time allocation study – Its methodological implications. In Technical seminar on ‘Women’s Work and Employment’. New Delhi: Institute of Social Studies Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. Thomas, Hiromi Ono, and Frank P. Stafford. 2003. An assessment of alternative measures of time use. Sociological Methodology 33. 19–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2003.t01–1-00126.x. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111)

  • Kan, Man Yee, and Stephen Pudney. 2008. Measurement error in stylized and diary data on time use. Sociological Methodology 38: 101–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2008.00197.x. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedberg, Gunilla M., Malin E. Hesselstrand, and Chris M. Henriksson. 2009. Time use and activity patterns in women with long-term pain. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 11: 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120410019081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfström, Erica, and Jenny Palm. 2008. Visualising household energy use in the interest of developing sustainable energy systems. Housing Studies 23: 935–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030802425602. Taylor & Francis Group.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, William. 2005. Time use: Expanding the explanatory power of the social sciences. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 36: 284–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnen, Joeri, Ignace Glorieux, Theun Van Tienoven, S. Daniels, D. Weenas, and J. Deyaert. 2014. MOTUS: Modular online time-use survey-translating an existing method in the 21st century. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research 11: 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachmias, David. 1981. Research methods in the social sciences. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Michelle. 2010. Unobtrusive research methods – An interpretative essay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodromídis, Pródromos-Ioánnis K. 2014. Approaching the female labor supply from the unpaid work and non-work functions: Time-use diary evidence from Britain, 1998–9. International Journal of Manpower 35: 643–670. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-05-2014-0121. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, Elizabeth. 2008. Conspicuous invisibility. Qualitative Inquiry 14: 1480–1499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408318318. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randel, Judith, Tony German, Deborah Ewing, and HelpAge International. 1999. The ageing and development report: Poverty, independence and the world’s older people. London: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John P., and Geoffrey Godbey. 1999. Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. Vol. 104. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/210016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John P., Philip E. Converse, and Alexander Szalai. 1972. The use of time: Daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, Linda L. 1999. Measuring how people spend their time: A time-use survey design. Monthly Labor Review 122: 12. https://doi.org/10.1086/250095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Economic Commission for European. 2013. Harmonised European time use surveys.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Maryland. 2014. Time use laboratory. Measuring time use.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrotsou, Katerina, Kajsa Ellegård, Matthew Cooper, Katerina Vrotsou, Kajsa Ellegård, and Matthew Cooper. 2009. Exploring time diaries using semi-automated activity pattern extraction. electronic International. Journal of Time Use Research 6: 1–25. Research Institute on Professions (Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB)) and The International Association for Time Use Research (IATUR).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. 2002. Active ageing: A policy framework. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRVS. 2011. Valuing the socio-economic contribution of older people in the UK. Cardiff: WRVS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuzanek, Jiri. 2013. Does being well-off make us happier? Problems of measurement. Journal of Happiness Studies 14: 795–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9356-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Husain, Z. (2020). Daily Life of the Aged: An Analysis of Time-Use Diaries. In: Active Ageing and Labour Market Engagement. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0583-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0583-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0582-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0583-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics