Abstract
Conceptual map of sociology of disability, dwelling on the social history of disability, society’s perceptions and perspectives on the disabled body, the explanations of disability by theorists, sociologists and activists etc., is critical to understanding disability which is a complex and dynamic phenomenon as also a highly debated one. Social model, as one of the central points of discussion in the discourse of sociology of disability, is presented with in-depth analysis. Disability discrimination as oppression is discussed, explaining how the history of disability discrimination chronicles a persistent infliction of segregation, dehumanization and exploitation. A brief discussion of the analysis of disability through the lens of theorizations by different sociologists like biopower of Foucault, habitus and capital of Bourdieu, capability approach of Sen and capitalism of Marx is presented. This is followed with the analysis of disability through sociological principles like normalcy and subjectivity and conceptualization of disability by sociologists and disability activists using the theorization of ableism. The chapter ends with a discussion on cultural and feminist perspectives of disability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Allan, J. (2010). The sociology of disability and the struggle for inclusive education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(5), 603. Retrieved from https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/2781/1/BJSEPaper%5b1%5d.pdf.
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). Curriculum, assessment and reporting in special educational needs and disability: A thematic overview of recent literature, research report. Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from: http://www.acara.edu.au/_resources/ACARA_Research_for_Publication_Final.pdf
Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2002). Disability (key concepts). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Barnes, C., Mercer, G., & Shakespeare, T. (1999). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Barton, L. (2001). Disability, struggle and the politics of hope. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability, politics and the struggle for change. London: David Fulton Publishers.
Bonwich, E. (1985). Sex role attitudes and role reorganisations in spinal cord injured women. In M. J. Deegan & N. A. Brooks (Eds.), Women and disability: The double handicap (pp. 56–57). New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of capital (from Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, ed. by J. G. Richardson). Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/~eckert/PDF/Bourdieu1986.pdf
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). The forms of capital. In A. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy and society (pp. 46–59). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brittan, A., & Maynard, M. (1984). Sexism, racism, and oppression. NJ: Blackwell.
Campbell, F. K. (2009). Concours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability, oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Deegan, M. J., & Brooks, N. (1985). Women and disability: The double handicap. New Brunswick: Transaction Press.
DiGiorgio, C. (2009). Application of Bourdieuian theory to the inclusion of students with learning/physical challenges in multicultural school settings. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(2), 179–194. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701350622.
Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1995). Disabled women: Sexism without the pedestal. In M. J. Deegan & N. A. Brooks (Eds.), Women and disability: The double handicap. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Foster, J. E., & Handy, C. (2008). External capabilities (Chapter 19). Arguments for a better world: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen, 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239115.003.0020
Foucault, M. (1980). The history of sexuality. Volume One: An introduction Michel Foucault (p. 140). New York: Vintage Books.
French, S. (1993). Disability, impairment or something in between. In J. Swain, S. French, C. Barnes, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Disabling barriers, enabling environments (pp. 17–25). London: Sage.
French, S. (1994). On equal terms: Working with disabled people. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Speece, D. L. (2002). Treatment validity as a unifying construct for identifying learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 33–46.
Kane, H., & Tangdhanakanond, K. (2008). A comparison of discrepancy procedures for learning disabilities: Evidence from the United States. International Journal of Special Education, 23, 1–9.
Linton, S. (1998). Claiming Disability. NY: New York University Press.
Miller, P., Parker, S., & Gillinson, S. (2004). Disablism: How to tackle the last prejudice. London: Demos.
Mitra, S. (2006). The capability approach and disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16(4), 236.
Morris, J. (1991). Pride against prejudice: Transforming attitudes to disability. London: The Women’s Press.
Oliver, M. (1990). Structuring of disabled identities in politics of disablement. Thames Polytechnic: Macmillan Publishers Limited. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1.
Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (1996). Disabled people and social policy: From exclusion to inclusion. London: Longman.
Quicke, J. (1985). Disability in modern children’s fiction. Cambridge, MA: Croom Helm Ltd.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.
Sen, A. (2007). Children and human rights. Indian Journal of Human Development, 1(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703020070201.
Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London: Routledge.
Shakespeare, T. (2017). The disability studies reader (L. J. Davis, Ed.). New York: Routledge.
Swain, J., & French, S. (2008). Disability on equal terms. London: Sage.
Thomas, C. (2007). Sociologies of disability and illness: Contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thomson, R. G. (2013). Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. NWSA Journal, 14, 3. Feminist Disability Studies, 1–32. Retrieved in March 2019 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4316922
Tremain, S. (2010). Biopower, styles of reasoning, and what’s still missing from the stem cell debates. Hypatia, 25(3), 577–609.
Wolbring, G. (2008). Politics of disablement. Development, 51, 252–258.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chennat, S. (2019). Sociology of Disability. In: Chennat, S. (eds) Disability Inclusion and Inclusive Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0524-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0524-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0523-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0524-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)