Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Looking to Courts of Law for Disaster Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Natural Hazards and Disaster Justice

  • 995 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers the implications of a desire to look to the courts of law to deliver a form of disaster justice by distributing those losses across the decision makers that contribute to vulnerability. It is argued that the state should consider alternatives to adversarial legal process in order to deliver disaster justice. A better approach would be to adopt ‘restorative practice’ inquiries—that is, inquiries that focus on the consequences of an event and which seek to understand why an event was important for those involved and how those involved can make sense, learn from and take responsibility for identifying and implementing learning from the event. Essential to the restorative process is consideration of making good financial losses without the need to blame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, L., & Doherty, M. (2012, September 20). Fire Litigation Ends for ACT. Canberra Times (Online). Retrieved January 11, 2019, from https://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/act/fire-litigation-ends-for-act-20120920-268d2.html

  • Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). (2014, July 15). Black Saturday Bushfire Survivors Secure $500 Million in Australia’s Largest Class Action Payout. ABC News (Online). Retrieved January 11, 2019, from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-15/black-saturday-bushfire-survivors-secure-record-payout/5597062

  • Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). (2016a, February 7). Black Saturday Bushfire Compensation Delay from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers Worries Victims. ABC News (Online). Retrieved January 11, 2019, from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-06/black-saturday-compensation-delayed-by-maurice-blackburn/7145792

  • Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). (2016b, August 5). Heartbreak and Frustration as Black Saturday Victims Wait for Payout. Background Briefing (Online). Retrieved January 11, 2019, from https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/black-saturday-survivors-critical-as-class-action-drags-on/7692988

  • Braithwaite, J., Charlesworth, H., & Soares, A. (2012). Networked Governance of Freedom and Tyranny: Peace in Timor-Leste. ANU E Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J., & Strang, H. (2001). Introduction: Restorative Justice and Civil Society. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative Justice and Civil Society (pp. 1–13). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstyner, N., & Sourdin, T. (2014). Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied. Victoria University Law and Justice Journal, 4(1), 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre (BNHCRC). (2018, June 13). Restorative Inquiries and Natural Disasters. A Report on the Symposium Held at the University of Newcastle (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, E. (2012, September 20). Bushfire Litigation Ends for ACT Govt. ABC News (Online). Retrieved January 11, 2019, from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-09-20/fire-litigation-over-for-act-government/4272298

  • Cole, L., Dovers, S., Gough, M., & Eburn, M. (2018). Can Major Post-Event Inquiries and Reviews Contribute to Lessons Management? Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 33, 234–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth. (2011, February 10). Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 381 (Julia Gillard).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. (2008). Thinking About Justice ‘Outside of the Box’: Could Restorative Justice Practices Create Justice for Victims of International Disasters? New England Law Review, 42(4), 693–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2011). National Strategy for Disaster Resilience, Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved January 14, 2019, from https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/media/2153/nationalstrategyfordisasterresilience.pdf

  • Daly, K. (2004). Restorative Justice: The Real Story. In D. Roche (Ed.), Restorative Justice (pp. 85–109). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doogan, M. (2006). The Canberra Firestorm: Inquests and Inquiry into Four Deaths and Four Fires Between 8 and 18 January 2003 (ACT Coroners Court).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eburn, M., & Cary, C. (2017). You Own the Fuel, but Who Owns the Fire? International Journal of Wildland Fire, 26(12), 999–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eburn, M., & Dovers, S. (2015). Learning Lessons from Disasters: Alternatives to Royal Commissions and Other Quasi-Judicial Inquiries. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(4), 495–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eburn, M., & Dovers, S. (2017). Reviewing High-Risk and High-Consequence Decisions: Finding a Safer Way. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 32(4), 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emergency Management Australia (EMA). (2010). National Catastrophic Disaster Plan (NATCATDISPLAN), Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emergency Management Australia (EMA). (2018). Australian Disaster Preparedness Framework, Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, K. R. (2005). What Is Life Worth? The Unprecedented Effort to Compensate the Victims of 9/11. Public Affairs, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E. (2016). Reframing Rural Fire Management. Report of the Special Inquiry into the January 2016 Waroona Fire, Government of Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gissing, A., Eburn, M., & McAneney, J. (2018). Planning and Capability Requirements for Catastrophic and Cascading Events, Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC. Retrieved January 15, 2019, from https://www.bnhcrc.com.au/publications/biblio/bnh-4795

  • Johnstone, G. (2003). Restorative Justice: Ideas, Values, Debates (pp. 1–2). Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keelty, M. J. (2011). A Shared Responsibility. The Report of the Perth Hills Bushfire February 2011 Review, Government of Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, J., & Philpott, D. (2014). Restorative Justice and Reconciliation: Twin Frameworks for Peacebuilding. In J. J. Llewellyn & D. Philpott (Eds.), Restorative Justice, Reconciliation and Peacebuilding (pp. 14–36). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCold, P. (2000). Toward a Holistic Vision of Restorative Juvenile Justice: A Reply to the Maximalist Model. Contemporary Justice Review, 3(4), 357–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, E., Fergusson, R., Hughes, G., & Westmarland, L. (2003). Introduction: Justice in the Round—Contextualising Restorative Justice. In E. McLaughlin, R. Fergusson, G. Hughes, & L. Westmarland (Eds.), Restorative Justice: Critical Issues (pp. 1–17). SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, R. (2003). Inquiry into the Operational Response to the January 2003 Bushfires in the ACT (ACT Government).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilis, T. (2009). Perceptions in Litigation and Mediation. Cambridge University Press, Chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senate. (2010). Select Committee on Agricultural and Related Industries: The Incidence and Severity of Bushfires across Australia, Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nova Scotia Home for Colored Children Restorative Inquiry. (2015). Mandate & Terms of Reference (Nova Scotia). Retrieved January 14, 2019, from https://restorativeinquiry.ca/sites/default/files/u4/nshcc-restorative-inquiry-report.pdf

  • The Nova Scotia Home for Colored Children Restorative Inquiry. (n.d.). Retrieved January 14, 2019, from https://restorativeinquiry.ca/

  • Victoria 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission. (2010). Final Report, Parliament of Victoria. Retrieved from http://royalcommission.vic.gov.au/Commission-Reports/Final-Report.html

  • Vincent, C., Phillips, A., & Young, M. (1994). Why Do People Sue Doctors? A Study of Patients and Relatives Taking Legal Action. The Lancet, 343(8913), 1609–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Cases

  • Ballantyne v Electricity Trust of South Australia (1993) SASC 4275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel Herridge & Ors v Electricity Networks Corporation T/As Western Power [No 4] [2019] WASC 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Electro Optic Systems Pty Ltd and West v NSW [2012] ACTSC 184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews v AusNet Electricity Services Pty Ltd & Ors [2014] VSC 663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews v SPI Electricity & Ors (Ruling No 3) [2011] VSC 399.

    Google Scholar 

  • May v Electricity Trust of South Australia (1993) SASC 4149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercieca v SPI Electricity Pty Ltd & Ors [2012] VSC 204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe v AusNet Electricity Services Pty Ltd & Ors [2015] VSC 232.

    Google Scholar 

  • SA Electricity v Union Insurance [1997] SASC 6241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seas Sapfor Forests v Electricity Trust of South Australia (1993) SASC 4004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seas Sapfor Forests v Electricity Trust of South Australia (1996) SASC 5718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timbs v Shoalhaven City Council [2004] NSWCA 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodend Water v. Hyan 1990 VIC LEXIS 1106.

    Google Scholar 

Legislation

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ANU College of Law, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Michael Eburn

Authors
  1. Michael Eburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Eburn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fenner School of Environment and Society and Institute for Integrated Research on Disaster Risk Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Anna Lukasiewicz

  2. Urban Design and Town Planning and Sustainability Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD, Australia

    Claudia Baldwin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Eburn, M. (2020). Looking to Courts of Law for Disaster Justice. In: Lukasiewicz, A., Baldwin, C. (eds) Natural Hazards and Disaster Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0466-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0466-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0465-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0466-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation