Skip to main content

Effects of Permafrost on Earthquake Resistance of Transport Facilities in the Baikal–Amur Mainline Area

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Transportation Soil Engineering in Cold Regions, Volume 1

Abstract

The permafrost region includes about 50% of seismic areas of Russia. One of the largest Russian railway lines, the Baikal–Amur Mainline (BAM), runs through these areas. Currently, there is much concern about the continuation of its construction in an effective manner and development of the adjacent areas that are rich in mineral resources and woods. Key characteristic factors of this region include permafrost occurring down to a depth of several hundred meters, long severe winter period, strong winds, seismic rating of up to 9 and higher. Earthquake consequences have never been considered as a natural disaster because the territory is sparsely populated. However, with anticipated populating and further development of this area in the nearest future, studying of seismic manifestation, as well as implementation of efficient solutions ensuring reliability of transport buildings and structures, will be an important national task. By reviewing geotechnical and seismic conditions in the mainline area, one of the most hazardous parts of the route can be defined, i.e., the western part where permafrost penetration is as deep as 200 m and deeper, with permafrost soil temperatures down to minus 6 °C with high ice content in the soil. This part of the mainline is characterized by rate 5–10 earthquake manifestations. In addition, mudflows, snow slips, and landslides are common in this part of the mainline. Seismic activity in this region is characterized not only by high degree of earthquake intensity, but also by frequency of earthquake manifestations. According to seismological information of researchers, in the mainline area rate 8 earthquakes can be expected to repeat in 15–20 years, rate 9 earthquakes can be expected to repeat in 60–70 years, and rate 10 earthquakes can be expected to repeat in 200–250 years. This repetition rate of earthquakes gives significant rise to the medium frequency of earthquakes in one geographic point of a seismic area, which is a parameter taken into account by seismic construction regulations. This paper discusses the issues of permafrost effects on the seismic hazard of the mainline area and includes recommendations for the need to consider these effects when designing facilities of transport infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Solonenko VP (1979) Seismology and seismic zoning of the BAM route and its economic influence zone. Nauka, Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk

    Google Scholar 

  2. Solonenko VP (1981) Seismological conditions of the BAM construction area. Irkutsk Region Publishing House No. 1, Irkutsk

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grib SI (1983) Pile foundations on permafrost soils in seismic areas. Stroyizdat, Leningrad Division, Leningrad

    Google Scholar 

  4. Soloviev VS et al (1980) In: Fedorov DI (ed) Transportation buildings. Transport, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  5. Solonenko VP (1964) Earthquakes and volcanoes of the Stanovoe upland. Priroda 9:102–110

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chemezov EN, Petrov AF, Blinova TE (2007) On seismic hazard on the territory of Yakutia. In: Vestnik of M.K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University, vol 4, no 3, pp 33–38

    Google Scholar 

  7. Polyakov SV (1978) Consequences of Severe Earthquakes. Stroyizdat, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  8. TASS Home Page. https://tass.ru/proisshestviya/5857956. Access date 2018/12/20

  9. Recommendations for Design and Construction of Continuous and Pile Foundations of Buildings for Transport Purposes in Conditions of Permafrost Soils and Seismic Activity. Central Institute of Scientific Information on Construction and Architecture (TsNIIS), Moscow (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Recommendations for Spatial Arrangements and Structural Solutions of Buildings for Transport Purposes in Conditions of Permafrost Soils and Seismic Activity in the BAM Area. Central Institute of Scientific Information on Construction and Architecture (TsNIIS), Moscow (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kotov PI, Roman LT, Sakharov II, Paramonov VN, Paramonov MB (2015) Influence of thawing conditions and type of testing on deformation characteristics of thawing soil. Soil Mech Found Eng 52(5):254–261

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rempel AW (2007) Formation of ice lenses and frost heave. Earth Surf USA 70–76

    Google Scholar 

  13. Torre Jorgenson M, Racine CH, Walters JC, Osterkamp TE (2001) Permafrost degradation and ecological changes associated with a warming climate in Central Alaska, vol 48, no 4. Springer International Publishing AG, pp 551–579

    Google Scholar 

  14. Uzdin AM, Elizarov SV, Belash TA (2012) Earthquake-resistant structures of transport buildings and structures. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution “Educational and Methodical Center for Education in Railway Transport”, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eisenberg YaM, Gaiyrov BK, Katyshev MK, Melentiyev AM, Nemykin AN, Neimark LI, Podgorny VA, Smertin OS (1987) New effective solutions for seismic protection of buildings for construction in the complicated soil and geological, seismic, and climatic conditions of BAM and South-Yakutian Coal Field. Abstracts of reports of the All-union meeting (field session) “Seismicity, Geological Engineering, and Ground Water Hydrology of the BAM Zone”, pp 31–33. The Institute of Earth’s Crust, Siberian Branch of AS USSR, Irkutsk

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eisenberg YaM, Deglina MM, Mazhiyev KhN et al (1983) In: Eisenberg YaM (ed) Seismic isolation and adaptive seismic protection systems. Nauka, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kharitonov VA (1978) Aseismic construction in areas of permafrost soil propagation. Central Institute of Scientific Information on Construction and Architecture (TsNIIS), Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  18. Belash TA, Sergeyev DA (2016) Implementation of principle of seismic isolation in buildings on permafrost soils residential construction. Zhilishchnoe Stroitelstvo Magazine No. 1–2, pp 47–50

    Google Scholar 

  19. Belash TA, Nudga IB, Sergeyev DA (2014) Foundation of aseismic building: patent 145799, Russian Federation, IPC E 04 H 9/02/; applicant and patent owner: Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education Emperor Alexander I St. Petersburg State Transport University, No. 2014120020/03; application made on 19.05.2014; published on 27.09.2014, Bulletin No. 27

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stepanova EV, Nudga IB, Sandovich TA, Al-Naser M Author’s certificate No. 1604937 [USSR]. Antiseismic support device Application made on 21.01.89, (21) 4657464/31–33; published on 07.11.90, Bulletin of Inventions No. 41, IPC E0201 27/34; E04H 9/02

    Google Scholar 

  21. Elizarov SV, Lugovaya EV (2005) Foundation of aseismic building: Utility model patent No. 46517, application 2005103717/22 dated 11.02.2005; published on 10.07.2005, Bulletin No. 19

    Google Scholar 

  22. Belash TA (2017) Non-traditional methods of seismic protection of transport buildings and structures. Federal State Budgetary Institution of Extended Education “Training and Methodological Center for Education in Railway Transport”, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  23. Perelmuter AV, Slivker VI (2007) Stability of equilibrium of structures and related problems, vol 1. Moscow

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. A. Belash .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Belash, T.A., Uzdin, A.M. (2020). Effects of Permafrost on Earthquake Resistance of Transport Facilities in the Baikal–Amur Mainline Area. In: Petriaev, A., Konon, A. (eds) Transportation Soil Engineering in Cold Regions, Volume 1. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 49. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0450-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0450-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0449-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0450-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics