Skip to main content

Optimising Fractal Encoding Using Cuttlefish Optimisation Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Bioinformatics, Multimedia, and Electronics Circuits and Signals

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1064))

  • 411 Accesses

Abstract

Increase in demand for better appearance and less storage requirement of an image has led to explore various image compression techniques. Due to technological advancement of photo capturing devices such as single-lens reflex camera (SLR), digital SLR, smart phone cameras, and satellite sensors, more detailed information can be recorded in a single image. A coloured image captured by high wavelength sensors produces large-sized image as it contains highly correlated data. Many image compression and analysis techniques have been developed to aid the interpretation of images and to compress as much information as possible in it. The goal of image compression is to recreate original image with less number of bits and minimal data loss. For generating computer graphic images and compression of objects, it has been suggested that by storing images in the form of transformation instead of pixels lead to compression and can be achieved through fractal coding. In fractal image compression, encoding image blocks into fractal codes using iterated function system (IFS) takes large amount of time taken to compress it. A study of various meta-heuristics techniques, which are designed to solve complex problems approximately, has been conducted to improve upon computational time of fractal coding as well as compression ratio, while maintaining image visually. In this paper, using the property of pattern adaption of surroundings, cuttlefish optimisation algorithm is applied to minimise the time taken for fractal coding. Compression results have been compared with other meta-heuristic techniques, such as particle swarm optimisation and genetic algorithm, and has shown high compression ratio of approximately 31%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. R.C. Gonzalez, Digital Image Processing (Pearson Education, India, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Dhawan, A review of image compression and comparison of its algorithms. IJECT 2(1) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Pancholi, R. Shah, M. Modi, Tutorial review on existing image compression techniques. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. 3(8), 7882–7889 (2014). ISSN:2319-7242

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Devi, U. Mehta, A review on various techniques of image compression. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. 5(7), 17127–17129 (2016). ISSN: 2319-7242

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.F. Barnsley, Fractals Everywhere. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Manda et al., Population based metaheuristic techniques for solving optimization problems: a selective survey. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 2(11) (2012). ISSN 2250-2459

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Xinjie, G. Mitsuo, Introduction to Evolutionary Algorithms (Springer, London Limited, 2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Sehgal, S. Kumar, M. Hima Bindu, Remotely sensed image thresholding using OTSU and differential evolution approach, in: 2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science and Engineering–Confluence

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Sindhuja, P. Ramamoorthy, M. Suresh Kumar, A brief survey on nature inspired algorithms: clever algorithms for optimization. Asian J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 7(1), 27–32 (2018). ISSN: 2249-0701

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Bani-Eqbal, Speeding up fractal image compression. Proc. SPIE. 2418, 2/1–2/3 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.204140

  11. D. Vidya, R. Parthasarathy, T.C. Bina, N.G. Swaroopa, Architecture for fractal image compression. J. Syst. Archit. 46, 275–1291 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S.S. Bobde, M.V. Kulkarni, P.V. Kulkarni, Fractal image compression using genetic algorithm, in 2010 International Conference on Advances in Computer Engineering (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Omari, S. Yaichi, Image compression based on genetic algorithm optimization (IEEE, 2015). 978–1-4799-8172-4/15

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Uma, P. Geetha Palanisamy, P. Geetha Poornachandran, Comparison of image compression using GA, ACO and PSO techniques, in IEEE-International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology, ICRTIT (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Vahdati, H. Khodadadi, M. Yaghoobi, Fractal image compression based on spatial correlation and hybrid particle swarm optimization with genetic algorithm, in 2010 2nd International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering (ICSTE) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.S. Eesa, A.M.A. Brifcani, Z. Orman, Cuttlefish algorithm–a novel bio-inspired optimization algorithm. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 4(9) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.S. Eesa, A.M.A Brifcani, Z. Orman, A new tool for global optimization problems- cuttlefish algorithm, in Proceeds in International Conference on Computer Science (ICCS 2014) (Rome, Italy, September 18–19, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Binitha, S.S. Sathya, A survey of bio inspired optimization algorithms. Int. J. Soft Comput. Eng. (IJSCE) 2(2) (2012). ISSN: 2231-2307

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Marcin, S. Czesãaw, Test functions for optimization needs (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.E. Hutchinson, Fractals and self similarity. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 35(5) (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  21. M.F. Barnsley, A.D. Sloan, A better way to compress images. BYTE 215–218 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  22. A.E. Jaquin, Image coding based on a fractal theory of iterated contractive image transformation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1(1) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  23. A.E Jaquin, Fractal image coding: a review. Proc. Tile IEEE 81(10) (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Fisher, Fractal Image Compression, Siggraph 92 Course Notes

    Google Scholar 

  25. M.M. Lydia, J.D. Eric, T.H. Roger, N.M. Justin, Mechanisms and behavioural functions of structural coloration in cephalopods. J. R. Soc. Interface (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. http://www.thecephalopodpage.org/

  27. E. Florey, Ultrastructure and function of cephalopod chromatophores. Am. Zool. (1969)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Smriti Sehgal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sehgal, S., Ahuja, L., Hima Bindu, M. (2020). Optimising Fractal Encoding Using Cuttlefish Optimisation Algorithm. In: Jain, L., Virvou, M., Piuri, V., Balas, V. (eds) Advances in Bioinformatics, Multimedia, and Electronics Circuits and Signals. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1064. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0339-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0339-9_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0338-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0339-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics