Abstract
Japanese manufacturing firms are known for their competitiveness in the global market; however, firms in the service sector have drawn less attention. This chapter investigates the Japanese market research industry and sheds light on how digital technological innovations have changed firms’ business models and competitive dynamics. One of the main jobs of market research firms is to prepare questionnaires, choose suitable respondents, and analyze results to evaluate the effects of advertisements, brand image, and customer satisfaction. Before 2000, these firms conducted surveys via mail, telephone, fax, home visits, and group interviews—Internet research emerged in 2000, becoming a disruptive innovation in the industry. Internet research consists of questionnaire surveys posted online and completed via the Internet. This disruption drastically changed the business model of market research. Traditional research methods incurred large variable costs, but new business models utilizing Internet research spent their budget on information systems investment, causing market leaders to enjoy economies of scale. A successful Japanese startup, Macromill Inc., grew rapidly in the 2000s; it gained the second-largest market share in the industry 10 years after its founding. However, a unique development in this industry was the rise of another startup that connected incumbent firms with disruptive technology. Cross Marketing Inc. formed alliances to provide Internet research services to companies that found it difficult to respond to disruptive technological changes. As a result of Cross Marketing’s strategic positioning, incumbent firms have survived the disruption caused by Internet research, and the company holds the third-largest market share in that industry. These case analyses of the Japanese market research industry reveal a unique aspect of the competitive dynamics raised by digital disruptive innovation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bughin, J., & Van Zeebroeck, N. (2017). The best response to digital disruption. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(4), 80–86.
Christensen, C. M. (2013). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Using good theory to solve the dilemmas of growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Cross Marketing. (2019). Nihon kokunai saidaikibo Cross Marketing no enquete panel (Japan’s largest Cross Marketing questionnaire panel, in Japanese). Available https://www.cross-m.co.jp/monitor. Accessed 30 April 2019.
Diamond Inc. (2003, February 1). Shukan diamond (Weekly Diamond, in Japanese).
ESOMAR Industry Report. (2014). Global market research 2014. Available http://www.jmra-net.or.jp/activities/trend/ranking/. Accessed 30 April 2019.
Hill, C. W., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257–274.
Japan Marketing Research Association. (2015). Internet chosa no unyou jittai ni kansuru chosa kenkyu houkokusho (Research report on Internet Research, in Japanese). Japan Marketing Research Association.
Japan Marketing Research Association. (2018). Dai 43 kai keiei gyomu jittai chosa (The 43rd survey of business condition, in Japanese). Available http://www.jmra-net.or.jp/activities/trend/investigation/. Accessed 30 April 2019.
Joe, T., & Montgomery, H. F. (Eds.). (2003). Service innovation: Organizational responses to technological opportunities and market imperatives (Vol. 9). London: Imperial College Press.
Kosaka, G., & Kosaka Seminar. (2014). Sijyo chosa gyokai: Net research no toujyou to sinkyu kigyo no koubou (Internet research industry: The rise of Internet research and competition between new and old companies, in Japanese). Hitotsubashi Business Review, 62(2), 114–129.
Loucks, J., Macaulay, J., Noronha, A., & Wade, M. (2016). Digital vortex: How today’s market leaders can beat disruptive competitors at their own game. Lausanne: Dbt Center Press.
Sirilli, G., & Evangelista, R. (1998). Technological innovation in services and manufacturing: Results from Italian surveys. Research Policy, 27(9), 881–899.
Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1147–1161.
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439–465.
Yamada, T. (2007). Sustainable company no jyoken (Conditions of a Sustainable Company, in Japanese). Tokyo: President Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kosaka, G. (2020). Digital Disruption in Japanese Market Research: Disrupters and a Startup Connecting Incumbents with New Technology. In: Khare, A., Ishikura, H., Baber, W. (eds) Transforming Japanese Business. Future of Business and Finance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0327-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0327-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0326-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0327-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)