Skip to main content

Mining the Contributions Along the Lifecycles of Open-Source Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Engineering and Methodology for Emerging Domains (NASAC 2017, NASAC 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 861))

  • 275 Accesses

Abstract

Recently the impact of developers’ behavior on the evolution of open-source software (OSS) has become a hot topic. When does the developer commit his/her code? Is there any regularity of the time distribution of commit along the lifecycles of open-source project? Will the change of the core member in a development team has an impact on software evolution process? We are quite interested in these above questions so we conducted an empirical study in this paper. We collect more than 50,000 commits from 6 open-source software in Github and design a formula to measure the contributor’s contribution value. We then take four major experiments to analyze some issues about inert intervals and the impact of the change of main contributors on software evolution. To make the result visible, we also design an automatic mining tool which can automatically mine the metadata from specified repository and make it graphically presented. Through the experiments we gained some interesting findings such as there is no inevitable statistical connection between a contributor’s inert interval and his contribution value, and main contributors’ change has a huge impact on the software evolution. We believe that these findings will have deeper research significance in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Asor, J.R., Catedrilla, G.M.B., Estrada, J.E.: A study on the road accidents using data investigation and visualization in los baños, laguna, philippines

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bird, C., Rigby, P.C., Barr, E.T., Hamilton, D.J., German, D.M., Devanbu, P.: The promises and perils of mining Git. In: 6th IEEE International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, MSR 2009, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blumberg, M., Pringle, C.D.: The missing opportunity in organizational research: some implications for a theory of work performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 7(4), 560–569 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Couger, J.D., Zawacki, R.A.: Motivating and Managing Computer Personnel. Wiley, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Curtis, B.: Fifteen years of psychology in software engineering: individual differences and cognitive science. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 97–106. IEEE Press (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dashorst, M., Hillenius, E.: Wicket in Action. Dreamtech Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gousios, G., Kalliamvakou, E., Spinellis, D.: Measuring developer contribution from software repository data. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp. 129–132. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guzman, E., Ibrahim, M., Glinz, M.: Mining twitter messages for software evolution. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, pp. 283–284. IEEE Press (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hassan, A.E.: The road ahead for mining software repositories. In: Frontiers of Software Maintenance, FoSM 2008, pp. 48–57. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Honsel, V.: Statistical learning and software mining for agent based simulation of software evolution. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering-Volume 2, pp. 863–866. IEEE Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kovalenko, V., Palomba, F., Bacchelli, A.: Mining file histories: should we consider branches? In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 202–213. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leibzon, W.: Social network of software development at GitHub. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 1374–1376. IEEE Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McIntyre, G.: A method for unbiased selective sampling, using ranked sets. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 3(4), 385–390 (1952)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mukaka, M.M.: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med. J. 24(3), 69–71 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peters, R., Zaidman, A.: Evaluating the lifespan of code smells using software repository mining. In: 2012 16th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR), pp. 411–416. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rodriguez, A., Tanaka, F., Kamei, Y.: Empirical study on the relationship between developer’ s working habits and efficiency (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shan, Y., Wang, X.: Visualization of linked biomedical data using cluster chart. In: 2017 14th Web Information Systems and Applications Conference (WISA), pp. 293–296. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sneed, H.M., Prentner, W.: Analyzing data on software evolution processes. In: 2016 Joint Conference of the International Workshop on Software Measurement and the International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement (IWSM-MENSURA), pp. 1–10. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tu, Q., et al.: Evolution in open source software: a case study. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2000, pp. 131–142. IEEE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Williams, C.C., Hollingsworth, J.K.: Automatic mining of source code repositories to improve bug finding techniques. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 31(6), 466–480 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, B.: Visual mining of behavior characteristics of open source software developers. Ph.D. thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ying, A.T., Wright, J.L., Abrams, S.: Source code that talks: an exploration of eclipse task comments and their implication to repository mining. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 30, 1–5 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou, M., Mockus, A.: What make long term contributors: willingness and opportunity in OSS community. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 518–528. IEEE Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is partially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (Grant No. BK20140611), the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61272080,61403187). All support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Xu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhou, H., Xu, L., Li, Y. (2019). Mining the Contributions Along the Lifecycles of Open-Source Projects. In: Li, Z., Jiang, H., Li, G., Zhou, M., Li, M. (eds) Software Engineering and Methodology for Emerging Domains. NASAC NASAC 2017 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 861. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0310-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0310-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0309-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0310-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics