Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer-Supported Collaborative L2 Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computer-Supported Collaborative Chinese Second Language Learning

Part of the book series: Chinese Language Learning Sciences ((CLLS))

  • 376 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter serves two purposes. First, it reviews the existing computer-supported collaborative second-language learning studies. A second purpose of the chapter is to echo Chap. 2 by concentrating on representational tools to present the rationale of social shaping of the technology. Affordances of technology can change depending on the users’ background and contexts. The chapter explains the necessity and possibility of a close analysis of how users (including both teachers and students) appropriate a representational tool for collaborative knowledge construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aditomo, A., Calvo, R., & Reimann, P. (2011) Collaborative writing: Too much of a good thing? Exploring engineering students’ perceptions using the repertory grid. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, N. Law, & K. M. Cheng (Eds.), Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 128–136). Hong Kong: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. (2009). Collaborative writing in wikis: Insights from culture project in German class. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (Vol. 5, pp. 115–144). CALICO monograph series. San Marcos, TX: Texas State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bera, S., & Liu, M. (2006). Cognitive tools, individual differences, and group processing as mediating factors in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 295–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning and Technology, 4(1), 120–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., Wilson, N. L., Cetto, M., & Ballester, C. P. (2008). Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 114–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodahl, C., Hadjerrouit, S., & Hansen, N. K. (2011). Collaborative writing with web 2.0 technologies: Education students’ perceptions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 73–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire. Open education, the long trail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43(1), 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, T. W. (2013). Sharing sentiment and wearing a pair of ‘field spectacles’ to view classroom orchestration. Computers & Education, 69, 514–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., & Looi, C. K. (2007). Incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: A new blended learning approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Research, 23(3), 308–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Looi, C. K., & Tan, S. (2010). What do students do in a F2F CSCL classroom? The optimization of multiple communications modes. Computers & Education, 55, 1159–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collentine, K. (2009). Learning use of holistic language units in multimodal, task-based synchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 68–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darhower, M. (2002). Interactional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19(2), 249–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, R., Drachman, R., Hever, R., Schwarz, B., Hoppe, U., Harrer, A., et al. (2007). Computer supported moderation of e-discussions: The ARGUNAUT approach. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Mice, minds, and society—The computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) Conference 2007 (pp. 165–167). International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Désilets, A., & Paquet, S. (2005). Wiki as a tool for web-based collaborative story telling in primary school: A case study. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Ed-Media 2005, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Chesapeake: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2010) Technology for classroom orchestration. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Cognition, computers and collaboration in education (pp. 525–552). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 23, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. In N. Balacheff, et al. (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 3–19). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., Zufferey, G., Alavi, H., Jermann, P., Do-Lenh, S., & Bonnard, Q. (2011). Classroom orchestration: The third circle of usability. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, N. Law, & K. M. Cheng (Eds.), International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2011 (pp. 510–517), Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadis, Y. A. (2010). Supporting teachers in orchestrating CSCL classrooms. Paper presented at the 7th Pan-Hellenic Conference with International Participation. Korinthos, Greece: University of Peloponnese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadis, Y., Prieto, L. P., & Asensio-Pérez, J. I. (2013). The role of design and enactment patterns in orchestration: Helping to integrate technology in blended classroom ecosystems. Computers & Education, 69, 496–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, N., & Suthers, D. D. (2006). Consistent practices in artifact-mediated collaboration. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 481–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2007). Supporting learning: Increasing complexity? Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1162–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1999). Theoretical perspectives on interaction and language learning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 3–33). Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning and Technology, 14(3), 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enyedy, N. (2005). Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 427–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Garcia, M., & Martinez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in non-native speaker-non-native speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19, 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, R. M. (2006). Teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviors during cooperative and small-group learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 271–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 193–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 213–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakkarainen, K., Paavola, S., & Lipponen, L. (2004). From communities of practice to innovative knowledge communities. LLine—Lifelong Learning in Europe, 9(2), 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, R., & Oksanen, K. (2012). Challenge of supporting vocational learning: Empowering collaboration in a scripted 3D game – How does teachers’ real-time orchestration make a difference? Computers & Education, 59, 281–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, R., & Wever, B. D. (2013). Vocational education approach: New TEL settings—New prospects for teachers’ instructional activities? International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 271–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 67–78). London: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49, 1037–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2008). Effects of representational guidance during computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 38, 59–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in Mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenning, M.-M. (2010). Collaborative scaffolding in online task-based voice interactions between advanced learners. ReCALL, 22(2), 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and quality of language production. Modwn Lanpage Journal, 79, 457–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2008). Networked-based Language Teaching. In N. V. Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 281–292).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in Wiki-based collaborative writing. Language and Education, 13(1), 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous language learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learner. Language Teaching Research, 12, 211–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larusson, J. A., & Alterman, R. (2007). Tracking online collaborative work as representational practice: Analysis and tool. In The 3rd International Conference on Communities and Technologies, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, M. Y., & Bonk, C. J. (2009). Interaction in blended EFL learning principles and practice. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. C., & Kao, L. C. (2007). Do handheld devices facilitate face-to-face collaboration? Handheld devices with large shared display groupware to facilitate group interactions. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 23(4), 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modeling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., Chen, W., & Ng, F. K. (2010). Collaborative activities enabled by GroupScribbles (GS): An exploratory study of learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 54(1), 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., Song, Y. J., Wen, Y., & Chen, W. L. (2013). Identifying pivotal contributions for group progressive inquiry in a multimodal interaction environment. In D. D. Suthers, et al. (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, computer-supported collaborative learning series (Vol. 16). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., & Silver, R. E. (2005). Interactional tasks and English L2 learning by immigrant children in Singapore. System, 33, 239–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mak, B., & Coniam, D. (2008). Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System, 36, 437–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, R., & Suthers, D. (2012). Inscriptions becoming representations in representational practices. Journal of Learning Sciences, 22, 33–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michinov, N., & Primois, C. (2005). Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversation analysis research approach. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1), 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: Some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 27, 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onrubia, J., & Engel, A. (2012). The role of teacher assistance on the effects of a macro-script in collaborative writing tasks. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 161–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L. (2007). Meaningful L2 practice in foreign language classrooms: A cognitive-interactionist SLA perspective. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 180–207). NewYork, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2010). Meeting at the wiki: The new arena for collaborative writing in foreign language courses. In M. Lee & C. McLaughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based E-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 209–227). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overdijk, M., & van Diggelen, W. (2008). Appropriation of a shared workspace: Organizing principles and their application. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 165–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overdijk, M., van Diggelen, W., Kirschner, P. A., & Baker, M. (2012). Connecting agents and artifacts in CSCL: Towards a rationale of mutual shaping. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellettieri, J. L. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59–86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, M. (1993). Exploring the potential of word processing for non-native writers. Computers and the Humanities, 27(3), 149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkwart, N., Aleven, V., Ashley, K., & Lynch, C. (2006). Toward legal argument instruction with graph grammars and collaborative filtering techniques. In M. Ikeda, K. Ashley, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2006) (pp. 227–236). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, L. P., Villagrá-Sobrino, S., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Martínez-Monés, A., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2011). Recurrent routines: Analyzing and supporting orchestration in technology-enhanced primary classrooms. Computers & Education, 57, 1214–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Goldstein, J. (2007). Comparing classroom enactments of an inquiry curriculum: Lessons learned from two teachers. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 81–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, P., Calvo, R., Yacef, K., & Southavilday, V. (2010). Comprehensive computational support for collaborative learning from writing. In S. L. Wong et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 129–137), Putrajaya, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., Dimitriadis, Y., & Hoppe, U. (2013). Classroom orchestration: Synthesis. Computers & Education, 69, 523–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, W. A., & Daniszewski, K. (2004). Mapping trade-offs in teachers’ integration of technology-supported inquiry in high school science classes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., & Feld, P. B. (2005). Enacting reform-based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Technology, 42(3), 283–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M. (2013). Shared orchestration within and beyond the classroom. Computers & Education, 69, 504–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., Janssen, J., & Phielix, C. (2010). Fostering complex learning-task performance through scripting student use of computer supported representational tools. Computes & Education, 55, 1707–1720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y. J., & Looi, C. K. (2012). Linking teacher beliefs, practices and student inquiry-based learning in a CSCL environment: A tale of two teachers. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 129–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southavilay, V., Yacef, K., & Calvo, R. A. (2009). WriteProc: A framework for exploring collaborative writing processes. In Proceedings of the 14th Australasian Document Computing Symposium (pp. 129–136), Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 21, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surry, D. W., & Ensminger, D. (2001). What’s wrong with media comparison studies? Educational Technology, 41(4), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning-making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 315–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2003). An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes. Journal of Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D., Connelly, J., Lesgold, A., Paolucci, M., Toth, E. E., Toth, J., et al. (2001). Representational and advisory guidance for students learning scientific inquiry. In K. D. Forbus & P. J. Feltovich (Eds.), Smart machines in education: The coming revolution in educational technology (pp. 7–35). Menlo Park: AAAI/MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D., Lund, K., Rosé, C., Dyke, G., et al. (2011). Towards productive multivocality in the analysis of collaborative learning. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, N. Law & K. M. Cheng (Eds.), International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 1015–1022). Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 97–114). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (2001). Integrating language and content teaching through collaborative tasks. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(1), 44–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(iii), 320–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabak, I., & Reiser, B. (1997). Complementary roles of software-based scaffolding teacher and student interactions in inquiry learning. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 289–298). Toronto, ON, Canada: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L. (2008). Mediating technologies and second language learning. In D. Leu, J. Coiro, C. Lankshear, & M. Knobel (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 417–449). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 82–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, I. (2002). Networks of innovation: Change and meaning in the age of the Internet. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C., Jaspers, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL. Computer in Human Behavior, 21, 575–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a game, right? Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2010). Invited commentary: New tools for teaching writing. Language Learning and Technology, 14(1), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R., McClaren, B. M., Chamrada, M., Schreuer, O., et al. (2010). Exploring creative thinking in graphically synchronous dialogues. Computers & Education, 54, 613–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen. Y., Looi, C. K., & Chen, W. L. (2011). Who are the beneficiaries when CSCL enters into Second Language classroom. Global Chinese Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L. H., Chen, W., Chai, C. S., Chin, C. K., & Gao, P. (2011). A blended collaborative writing approach for Chinese L2 primary school students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 1208–1226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanguas, Í. (2010). Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time! Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, S. W., Lo, J. J., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Scaffolding collaborative technical writing with procedural facilitation and synchronous discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 397–419.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nanyang Technological University, National Institute of Education, Singapore, Singapore

    Yun Wen

Authors
  1. Yun Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Wen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wen, Y. (2019). Computer-Supported Collaborative L2 Learning. In: Computer-Supported Collaborative Chinese Second Language Learning. Chinese Language Learning Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0271-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0271-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0270-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0271-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation