Skip to main content

Empirical Evaluation of Shallow and Deep Classifiers for Rumor Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Algorithms for Intelligent Systems ((AIS))

Abstract

Rumor Detection has attracted a lot of attention from the research communities ever since there has been a boom in social networking sites like Twitter, Facebook, etc., for spreading information and news at a very fast pace. We aim to analyze the various machine learning algorithms as well as deep learning algorithms on PHEME dataset which is a benchmark dataset and then propose an avant-garde method for detecting rumors based on deep learning architecture. In our work a detailed comparison of shallow classifiers as well as deep classifiers on the basis of performance parameters (accuracy, precision, and recall) is done which provides a deeper insight into the field of rumor detection. Same goes for the comparison between the deep learning techniques. On application of machine learning algorithms on PHEME dataset, maximum accuracy of 78.54% is achieved using conventional statistical TF-IDF weighing. However, on application of deep learning algorithms using word embeddings, results improve drastically, with Bidirectional LSTM yielding the highest accuracy of 91.1%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kumar, A., Khorwal, R., & Chaudhary, S. (2016). A survey on sentiment analysis using swarm intelligence. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(39), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhatia, M. P. S., & Kumar, A. (2010). Paradigm shifts: From pre-web information systems to recent web-based contextual information retrieval. Webology, 7(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar, A., & Sangwan, S. R. (2018). Rumour detection using machine learning techniques on social media. In International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communication, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar, A., Sangwan, S. R., & Nayyar, A. (2019). Rumour veracity detection on twitter using particle swarm optimized shallow classifiers. Multimedia Tools and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7398-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao, Z., Resnick, P., & Mei, Q. (2015). Enquiring minds: Early detection of rumours in social media from enquiry posts. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1395–1405).

    Google Scholar 

  6. DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2007). Rumour, gossip and urban legends. Diogenes, 54(1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zubiaga, A., Hoi, G. W. S., Liakata, M., & Procter, R. (2017). Detection and resolution of rumours in social media: A survey. arXiv:1704.00656.

  8. Kumar, A., & Jaiswal, A. (2017). Empirical study of twitter and tumblr for sentiment analysis using soft computing techniques. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, 1, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, B. (2015). Sentiment Analysis Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions. Chicago: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar, A., Dogra, P., & Dabas, V. (2015). Emotion analysis of Twitter using opinion mining.In International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3) (pp. 285–290). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, A., & Jaiswal, A. (2019). Systematic literature review of sentiment analysis on Twitter using soft computing techniques. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.5107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar, A., & Garg, G. (2019). Systematic literature review on context-based sentiment analysis in social multimedia. Multimedia Tools and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7346-5 (In-press).

  13. Kumar, A., & Sebastian, T. M. (2012). Sentiment analysis: A perspective on its past, present and future. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 4(10), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar, A., & Sebastian, T. M. (2012). Sentiment analysis on Twitter. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 9(3), 372–378.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Son, L. H., Kumar, A., Sangwan, S. R., Arora, A., Nayyar, A., & Abdel-Basset, M. (2019). Sarcasm detection using soft attention-based bidirectional long short-term memory model with convolution network. IEEE Access, 7, 23319–23328. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhatia, M. P. S., & Kumar, A. (2008). A primer on the web information retrieval paradigm. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology 1;4(7).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zubiaga, A., Wong Sak Hoi, G., Liakata, M., & Procter, R. (2016). PHEME dataset of rumours and non-rumours. figshare. Dataset.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, Z., et al. (2015). Emerging rumour identification for social media with hot topic detection. In 2015 12th Web Information System and Application Conference (WISA). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Qazvinian, V., et al. (2011). Rumour has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aker, A., Derczynski, L., & Bontcheva, K. (2017). Simple Open Stance Classification for Rumour Analysis. arXiv:1708.05286.

  21. Zubiaga, A., Hoi, G. W. S., Liakata, M., & Procter, R. (2017). Exploiting context for rumour detection in social media. In International Conference on Social Informatics. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2011). Information credibility on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 675–684). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ma, J., Gao, W., Mitra, P., Kwon, S., Jansen, B. J., Wong, K., & Cha, M. (2016). Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks. In IJCAI-16 (pp. 3818–3824).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li, L., Cai, G., & Chen, N. (2018). A rumor events detection method based on deep bidirectional GRU neural network. In 2018 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, Y., Chen, W., Kiat Yeo, C., Lau, C. T., & Lee, B. S. (2017). Detecting rumors on online social networks using multi-layer autoencoder. In 2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, Y., Chen, W., Yeo, C. K., Lau, C. T., & Lee, B. S. Unsupervised rumor detection based on users’ behaviors using neural networks. In 2017 Elsevier B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Munjal, P., Kumar, S., Kumar, L., & Banati, A. (2017). Opinion dynamics through natural phenomenon of grain growth and population migration. In Hybrid Intelligence for Social Networks (pp. 161–175). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Munjal, P., Narula, M., Kumar, S., & Banati, H. (2018). Twitter sentiments based suggestive framework to predict trends. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 21(4), 685–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Munjal, P., Kumar, L., Kumar, S., & Banati, H. (2019). Evidence of Ostwald Ripening in opinion driven dynamics of mutually competitive social networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zubiaga, A., Hoi, G. W. S., Liakata, M., Procter, R., & Tolmie, P. (2015). Analysing how people-orient to and spread rumours in social media by looking at conversational threads,” PLoS ONE, 1–33 [Online]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.07487.

  31. Cho, K., et al. (2014). Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078v3.pdf.

  32. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computing, 9(8), 1735–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Graves, A., Jaitly, N., & Mohamed, A.-R. (2013). Hybrid speech recognition with deep bidirectional LSTM. In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU) (pp. 273–278).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Li, Y., & Yuan, Y. (2017). Convergence analysis of two-layer neural networks with relu activation. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 597–607).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kumar, A., & Sebastian, T. M. (2012). Machine learning assisted sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Science & Engineering (ICCSE’2012) (pp. 123–130).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akshi Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumar, A., Singh, V., Ali, T., Pal, S., Singh, J. (2020). Empirical Evaluation of Shallow and Deep Classifiers for Rumor Detection. In: Sharma, H., Govindan, K., Poonia, R., Kumar, S., El-Medany, W. (eds) Advances in Computing and Intelligent Systems. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0222-4_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics