Skip to main content

Evaluation System for Reasoning Description of Judgment Documents Based on TensorFlow CNN

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Science (ICPCSEE 2019)

Abstract

In order to improve the quality of the judgment documents, the state and government have introduced laws and regulations. However, the current status of trials in our country is that the number of cases is very large. Using system to verify the documents can reduce the burden on the judges and ensure the accuracy of the judgment. This paper describes an evaluation system for reasoning description of judgment documents. The main evaluation steps include: segmenting the front and back of the law; extracting the key information in the document by using XML parsing technology; constructing the legal exclusive stop word library and preprocessing inputting text; entering the text input into the model to get the text matching result; using the “match keyword, compare sentencing degree” idea to judge whether the logic is consistent if it is the evaluation of “law and conclusion”; integrating the calculation results of each evaluation subject and feeding clear and concise results back to the system user. Simulation of real application scenarios was conducted to test whether the reasoning lacks key links or is insufficient or the judgment result is unreasonable. The result show that evaluation speed of each document is relatively fast and the accuracy of the evaluation of the common nine criminal cases is high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pollicino, O.: Legal reasoning of the court of justice in the context of the principle of equality between judicial activism and self-restraint. Ger. Law J. 5(3), 283–317 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sun, H.-P., Ma, L.-K.: Legal Reasoning in Adjudication Transparency, Justice and Credibility. Beijing University Press, pp. 5–40, (2016). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., et al.: TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems (2015). tensorflow.org

  4. Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., et al.: TensorFlow: a system for large-scale machine learnin. In: Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 2016), pp. 265–283 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Murray, C., Joseph, H., Feng-h, H.: Deep blue. Artif. Intell. 134(1–2), 57–83 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Shalev-Shwartz, S., Ben-David, S.: Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–24 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hijazi, S., Kumar, R., Rowen, C.: Using convolutional neural networks for image recognition, pp. 1–7. IP Group, Cadence (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, Y.: Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1746–1751 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rehurek, R.: Gensim Documentation Release 0.8.6 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bach, N.X., Nguyen, M.L., Shimazu, A.: PRE task: the task of recognition of requisite part and effectuation part in law sentences. Int. J. Comput. Process. Lang. (IJCPOL) 23(2), 109–130 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vijayarani, S., Ilamathi, J., Nithya, M.: Preprocessing techniques for text mining - an overview. J. Comput. Sci. Commun. Netw. 5(1), 7–16 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, Y.: Various Approaches in Text Pre-processing. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, Y., Wu W., Li, Z., Zhou, M.: Knowledge enhanced hybrid neural network for text matching. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-18), pp. 5586–5593 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Proceedings the 30th of Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), pp. 6000–6010 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0800803).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jidong Ge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

He, M. et al. (2019). Evaluation System for Reasoning Description of Judgment Documents Based on TensorFlow CNN. In: Cheng, X., Jing, W., Song, X., Lu, Z. (eds) Data Science. ICPCSEE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1058. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0118-0_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0118-0_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0117-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0118-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics