Abstract
It is too simplistic to see hybridity only as a type of organisation. Hybrids appear in micro, meso, and macro levels of activity consisting of pairwise interactions and network constellations between business firms and public agencies. Cleantech industry, health policy national innovation systems, and global air travel are showcases of hybrid activities in higher than organisational level of analysis. The current classifications of organisations do not acknowledge the existence of hybrids. The denial of existence of hybrids are embedded in the classification principles which have not followed the evolution of economic and social activities. It is also the case that seeing the reality as more simple than it really is provides heuristic tools to understand complex hybrid arrangements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. London: Penguin Books.
Bozeman, B., & Moulton, S. (2011). Integrative publicness: A framework for public management strategy and performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl. 3), i363–i380.
Cooke, P. (2008). Cleantech and an analysis of the platform nature of life sciences: Further reflections upon platform policies. European Planning Studies, 16(3), 375–393.
Dopfer, K. (2013). Evolutionary economics (Vol. 1308). Jena: Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik.
Dopfer, K., Foster, J., & Potts, J. (2004). Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(3), 263–279.
Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81–100.
European Commission. (2014). State aid for airline restructuring: Does it give you wings? Issue 10. Competition Directorate—General of the European Commission.
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology, policy, and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London; New York: Pinter Publishers.
Freeman, C. (1995). The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24.
Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Godin, B. (2009). National innovation system. Science, Technology & Human Values, 34(4), 476–501.
Greve, C., & Hodge, G. (2007). The challenge of public-private partnerships: Learning from international experience. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hanlon, J. (2007). Global airlines: Competition in a transnational industry. Oxford: Elsevier.
Harris, G. (2016). Transforming health through multisector partnerships. North Carolina Medical Journal, 77(4), 286–289.
Hey, J. (1982). Search for rules for search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(1), 65–81.
IATA. (2011). Vision 2050. Singapore: IATA.
Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2004). The politics of regulation: Institutions and regulatory reforms for the age of governance. Cheltenham; Northampton: E. Elgar.
Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.
Kickert, W. (2001). Public management and administrative reform in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Elgar.
Kissick, W. L. (1994). Medicine’s dilemmas: Infinite needs versus finite resources. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Koopmans, T. (1957). Three essays on the state of economic science. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kork, A., & Vakkuri, J. (2016). Improving access and managing healthcare demand with walk-in clinic: Convenient, but at what cost? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(2), 148–163.
Kreps, T., & Monin, B. (2011). “Doing well by doing good”? Ambivalent moral framing in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31(2), 99–123.
Nelson, R. (1992). National innovation systems: A retrospective on a study. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(2), 347–374.
O’Rourke, A. (2009). The emergence of cleantech. New Haven: Yale University.
OECD. (1997). National innovation systems. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2015). Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pache, A., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001.
Padgett, J., & Powell, W. (2012). Emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–268.
Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 295–336). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Prokop, D. (2014). Government regulation of international air transportation. In J. Peoples (Ed.), The economics of international airline transport (pp. 45–60). Bingley: Emerald.
Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237–262.
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652.
Richards, J. (2001). Institutions for flying: How states built a market in international aviation services. International Organization, 55(4), 993–1017.
Scott, R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In W. Powell & P. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism and organizational analysis (pp. 164–182). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Scott, W. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organizations: From professional dominance to managed care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sekhri, N., Feachem, R., & Ni, A. (2011). Public-private integrated partnerships demonstrate the potential to improve health care access, quality, and efficiency. Health Affairs, 30(8), 1498–1507.
Simmel, G., & Wolff, K. (1964). The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: The Free Press.
Simon, H. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.
Simon, H. (1991). Models of my life. New York: Basic Books.
Sokal, A. (1996). Transgressing the boundaries: An afterword. Dissent, 43(4), 93–99.
Stark, D. (2009). The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Thynne, I. (2011). Ownership as an instrument of policy and understanding in the public sphere: Trends and research agenda. Policy Studies, 32(3), 183–197.
Tilly, C. (2006). Regimes and repertoires. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tugores-García, A. (2013). Analysis of global airline alliances as a strategy for international network development. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
Vakkuri, J. (2010). Struggling with ambiguity: Public managers as users of NPM-oriented management instruments. Public Administration, 88(4), 999–1024.
Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector. Milton Park: Routledge.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.
Whitley, R. (2000). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Wildavsky, A. B. (1986). Budgeting: A comparative theory of the budgeting process. Oxford: Transaction Publishers.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1999). The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johanson, JE., Vakkuri, J. (2020). Perspectives on Hybridity. In: Lehtimäki, H., Uusikylä, P., Smedlund, A. (eds) Society as an Interaction Space. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 22. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0069-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0069-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0068-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0069-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)