Skip to main content

Adaptive Sensor Ranking Based on Utility Using Logistic Regression

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Soft Computing for Problem Solving

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1048))

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) consists of several tens to hundreds of nodes, interacting with each other. Thus, they have multiple communications between them, transferring and receiving several packets of data to each other. In order to reduce the overall traffic in the network and lessen the presence of redundant node data, this paper proposes an adaptive sensor ranking method by evaluating the task necessity, utility, and region coverage of a particular node in a given WSN. Logistic regression has been used to adaptively train the WSN to assign a status to node as on or off, thereby, decreasing the overall data transmission into the network, while still accounting for the entire range of the WSN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Prathap, U., Shenoy, P.D., Venugopal, K.R., Patnaik, L.M.: Wireless sensor networks applications and routing protocols: survey and research challenges. In: 2012 International symposium on cloud and services computing (ISCOS), pp. 49–56. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ammari, Habib M., Das, S.K.: Centralized and clustered k-coverage protocols for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. 61(1), 118–133 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajaboina, R., Reddy, P.C., Kumar, R.A., Venkatramana, N.: Performance comparison of TCP, UDP and TFRC in static wireless environment. Int. J. Inf. Comput. Secur. 8(2), 158–180 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Santini, S.: Using adaptive sensor ranking to reduce the overhead of the coverage configuration protocol. In: 2010 Sixth international conference on intelligent sensors, sensor networks and information processing (ISSNIP), pp. 109–114. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shepard, D.: A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM national conference/annual meeting, August 1968, pp. 517–524 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ammari, H.M., Das, S.K.: On the design of k-covered wireless sensor networks: self-versus triggered sensor scheduling. In: IEEE International Symposium on World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks and Workshops, 2009. WoWMoM 2009, pp. 1–9 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu, Y., Xiaohui, W., Han, Z.: Improved differential evolution to solve the two-objective coverage problem of wireless sensor networks. In: 2016 Chinese on control and decision conference (CCDC), pp. 2379–2384. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jai, B.P., Anandamurugan, S.: Mobility aware reputation node ranking (MARNR) for efficient clustering at hot spots in wireless sensor networks (WSN). In: 2013 international conference on information communication and embedded systems (ICICES), pp. 312–317. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ying, T., Yang, O.: Probabilistic based k-coverage configuration in large-scale sensor networks. In: 2010 2nd international conference on information science and engineering (ICISE), pp. 2257–2260. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anjuman, P., Khullar, V. Sentiment classification on Big Data using Naïve Bayes and logistic regression. In: International conference on computer communication and informatics (ICCCI-2017), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hu, Q., Shi, Z., Zhang, X., Gao, Z.: Fast HEVC intra mode decision based on logistic regression classification. In: 2016 IEEE international symposium on broadband multimedia systems and broadcasting (BMSB), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng, W., Hüllermeier, Eyke: Combining instance-based learning and logistic regression for multilabel classification. Mach. Learn. 76(2–3), 211–225 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Sundar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sundar, S., Baby, C.J., Itagi, A., Soni, S. (2020). Adaptive Sensor Ranking Based on Utility Using Logistic Regression. In: Das, K., Bansal, J., Deep, K., Nagar, A., Pathipooranam, P., Naidu, R. (eds) Soft Computing for Problem Solving. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1048. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0035-0_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics