Abstract
India and China are emerging technological powers and are becoming increasingly important players on the global stage in terms of their gross domestic product (GDP) growth and their share in the world economy. This chapter provides a descriptive empirical analysis for country-level comparison of major economic and information and communication technology (ICT) indicators. The ICT diffusion index (ICTDI) has been constructed to identify within-country inequalities in terms of the digital divide across Indian states and Chinese provinces. The descriptive analysis indicates that India is far behind China on fronts like the maturity of the Internet ecosystem, ICT foundations, ease of Internet entrepreneurship, and ICT health. But Internet growth in India has been around three times more than China between the years 2000 and 2017. The constructed ICTDI indicates that Indian states such as Kerala, Maharashtra, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu are more digitalised than Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh. In China, the East region is dominant as Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Guangdong show higher ICT diffusion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
An on-demand economy is an economy where economic activity is created by digital markets and technology companies to fulfil consumer demand.
- 2.
Diffusion is the process by which an innovation or idea is communicated through certain channels over time among members of a social system (www.encyclopedia.com).
- 3.
Sensitivity was checked considering equal weights also and the results are similar.
- 4.
Data for Telangana state are not available and hence the state is not included.
- 5.
Data for descriptive analysis have been collected for the duration 2010–2016 for most of the comparative indicators. Due to data unavailability for the year 2016, the statistics till 2015 are considered for certain indicators.
- 6.
Internet users are presented as the proportion of people who have access to the Internet at home, work or in public spaces (Kemp 2018).
- 7.
The IDI was developed by ITU in 2008 in response to ITU Member States’ request to establish an overall ICT index. It was first presented in the 2009 edition of the Report and has been published annually since then (www.itu.int).
- 8.
The skills sub-index is given less weight in the computation of the IDI than the other two sub-indices due to the presence of these proxy indicators (www.itu.int).
- 9.
Worldwide, 51% of the websites are in English language (Kemp 2018).
- 10.
Percentage of the population who bought something online via any device in the past month as per the survey which was conducted in 2017.
- 11.
Percentage of the population who bought something online via a phone in the past month as per the survey which was conducted in 2017.
- 12.
Several tailor-made equipment entered the market via private manufacturers. The Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited were set up under the Government of India, Department of Telecommunication.
- 13.
It was a landmark in the history of the telecom sector in India. Several value-added services were introduced in addition to the decentralisation of the manufacturing of equipment pertaining to the telecom sector.
- 14.
The TRAI was endowed with more power. The Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited was reformed, followed by the introduction of the Internet in the Indian market.
- 15.
Data for all 29 states were not available on a yearly basis, hence the October–December 2017 data have been used from the TRAI report.
- 16.
Internet consultancy and IT-related hardware markets including personal computers and mobile handsets have flourished (Song 2008). The telecommunications sector was given a huge boost by the market-opening moves, which were accompanied by massive public and private investment.
- 17.
In terms of foreign investment, all the high-tech sectors of the economy, including telecommunications, are among the most active.
- 18.
The data for all the indicators are taken from the China Statistical Yearbook 2016.
- 19.
Massive investment in telecom and IT infrastructure.
References
Bosman, M. M., & Chakraborty, J. (2002). Regional variations in on-line job search trends: Does race (still) matter? In Papers and Proceedings of the Applied Geography Conferences (Vol. 25, pp. 350–358).
Brown, L. A. (1975). The market and infrastructure context of adoption: A spatial perspective on the diffusion of innovation. Economic Geography, 51(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.2307/143117.
Chakraborty, J., & Bosman, M. M. (2005). Measuring the digital divide in the United States: Race, income, and personal computer ownership. The Professional Geographer, 57, 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.2005.00486.x.
China Internet Network Information Centre. (2017). The 39th statistical report on internet development in China. https://cnnic.com.cn. Accessed January 1, 2019.
Dahlman, C. J. (2007). China and India: Emerging technological powers. Issues in Science and Technology, XXIII(3). http://issues.org/dahlman/. Accessed October 21, 2017.
Das, B. (2010). Diffusion of information and communication technology across Indian states and its determinants: An empirical analysis. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2c24/e1f8439d5bc68fac2b96f5467b9536f13ec8.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2018.
Dean, D., Digrande, S., Field, D., Lundmark, A., O’Day, J., Pineda, P., & Zwillenberg, P. (2012). The connecting world: The internet economy in the G-20. Boston Consulting Group. http://image-src.bcg.com/Images/The_Internet_Economy_G-20_tcm9-106842.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2017.
Desai, M. (2005). India and China: An essay in comparative political economy. In W. Tseng & D. Cowen (Eds.), India’s and China’s recent experience with reform and growth (pp. 1–22). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implication of the internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27A, 307–336.
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2012). Smart policies to close the digital divide—Best practices from around the world. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan049753.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2017.
Fong, M. W. L. (2009). Digital divide between urban and rural regions in China. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 36, 1–12. www.ejisdc.com. Accessed February 24, 2019.
Gnanasambandam, C., Madgavkar, A., Kaka, N., Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J, & Gomes, M. (2012). Online and upcoming: The internet’s impact on India. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/dotcom/client_service/high%20tech/pdfs/online_and_upcoming_the_internets_impact_on_india.ashx. Accessed July 22, 2017.
Guthrie, D. (2006). China and globalization: The social, economic, and political transformation of Chinese society. New York and London: Routledge.
Hargittai, E. (1999). Weaving the western web: Explaining differences in internet connectivity among OECD countries. Telecommunications Policy, 23, 701–718.
Harrington, J. (2007). The digital divide: Lessons from the People’s Republic of China. http://www.greennation.com/chidigi.pdf. December 12, 2007.
International Telecommunication Union. (2016). Measuring the information society report. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/mis2016.aspx. Accessed October 15, 2017.
Internet World Stats. (2018). Internet usage statistics. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm. Accessed October 22, 2018.
Jain, N., Bhalla, K., Roy, P. K., & Mittal, A. (2017). The $250 billion digital volcano: Dormant no more. Mumbai, India: Boston Consulting Group. https://media-publications.bcg.com/BCG-TiE-Digital-Volcano-Apr2017.pdf. Accessed October 28, 2017.
Katz, J. E., Rice, R. E., & Aspden, P. (2001). The internet, 1995-2000: Access, civic involvement, and social interaction. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 405–419.
Kaur, K., & Neena. (2014). Pattern of inter-state digital divide in India. Economic Affairs, 59. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-4666.2014.00006.0.
Kaur, K., & Singh, J. (2016). ICT diffusion and digital divide in India: Implications for economic policies. Pacific Business Review International, 1, 1–9.
Kemp, S. (2018). Digital in 2018. We are Social and Hootsuite. https://digitalreport.wearesocial.com/. Accessed February 20, 2019.
Kiiski, S., & Pohojola, M. (2002). Cross-country diffusion of the internet. Information Economics and Policy, 14, 297–310.
Kochhar, R. (2015). China’s middle class surges, while India’s lags behind. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/07/15/china-india-middle-class/. Accessed June 7, 2019.
Kvasny, L. (2002). Problematizing the digital divide: Cultural and social reproduction in a community technology initiative (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
Liang, B., & Lu, H. (2010). Internet development, censorship, and cybercrimes in China. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(1), 103–120.
Lindsay, C. (2005). Employability, services for unemployed job seekers and the digital divide. Urban Studies, 42, 325–339.
List of Regions of China. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_regions_of_China, Accessed on April 2, 2018.
Liu, H., Fang, C., & Sun, S. (2017). Digital inequality in provincial China. Environment and Planning A, 49, 2179–2182.
Loo, B., & Ngan, L. (2012). Developing mobile telecommunications to narrow digital divide in developing countries? Some lessons from China. Telecommunications Policy, 36(10–11), 888–900.
MacKinnon, R. (2008). Flatter world and thicker walls? Blogs, censorship and civic discourse in China. Public Choice, 134, 31–46.
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY). (2018). Electronics and information technology annual reports (various), India. https://meity.gov.in. Accessed March 2, 2018.
Ministry of Home Affairs, Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner. (2011). India: Census of India. www.censusindia.gov.in. Accessed October 22, 2017.
Ministry of Power. (2017). Central electricity authority report, India. http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/annual/annualreports/annual_report-2018.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2019.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2016). China statistical yearbook 2016. Beijing, China. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2016/indexeh.htm. Accessed 2 March 2018.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2000). Falling through the net: Towards digital inclusion. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce. https://www.ntia.doc.gov/report/2000/falling-through-net-toward-digital-inclusion. Accessed October 21, 2017.
Norris, P. (2000). The global divide: Information poverty and internet access worldwide. In Internet Conference at the International Political Science World Congress, August 2000, Quebec City. https://sites.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/IPSA2000.PDF. March 2, 2018.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty and the Internet in democratic societies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Parthasarathy, B., & Aoyama, Y. (2017). Deploying ICTs for development: An evolutionary perspective. Information Technologies & International Development (Special Section), 13, 157–170.
Poushter, J. (2017). China outpaces India in internet access, smartphone ownership. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/03/16/china-outpaces-india-in-internet-access-smartphone-ownership/. Accessed October 21, 2017.
Rao, S. S. (2005). Bridging digital divide: Efforts in India. Telematics and Informatics, 22, 361–375.
Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovation: A cross-cultural approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
Shah, A., Jain, N., & Bajpai, S. (2015, January). India@Digital, Bharat creating a $200Â billion internet economy. India: Boston Consulting Group and Internet and Mobile Association of India. https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/file180687.pdf. Accessed October 24, 2017.
Song, W. (2008). Development of the internet and digital divide in China: A spatial analysis. Intercultural Communication Studies, VXII(3). https://web.uri.edu/iaics/files/03-Wei-Song.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2018.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. (2018). The Indian telecom services performance indicators, October–December 2017, Delhi. https://main.trai.gov.in/release-publication/reports/performance-indicators-reports. Accessed March 2, 2019.
Tseng, S. F., & You, Y. C. (2013). The digital divide in China, Hongkong and Taiwan. In M. Ragnedda & G. W. Muschert (Eds.), The digital divide (1st ed., pp. 134–146). London and New York, NY: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Wensheng, W. (2001). Bridging the digital divide inside China. https://www.researchgate.net/…/228908087_Bridging_the_digital_divide_inside_China. Accessed April 4, 2018.
Wilhelm, A. G. (2001). They threw me a computer… but what I really needed was a life preserver. First Monday, 6(4). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/844/753. Accessed April 2, 2018.
Wolf, C., Dalal, S., DaVanzo, J., Larson, E. V., Akhmedjonov, A., Dogo, H., et al. (2011). Population trends in China and India: Demographic dividend or demographic drag? In China and India, 2025A comparative assessment (pp. 7–29). RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2011/RAND_MG1009.pdf. Accessed February 19, 2019.
Wong, P. K. (2002). ICT production and diffusion in Asia: Digital dividends or digital divide? Information Economics and Policy, 14, 167–187.
World Bank. World Bank data. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org. Accessed October 24, December 2018.
World Economic Forum. (2018). Global information technology reports. https://www.weforum.org/reports?page=6. Accessed March 7, 2018.
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank Dr. Ganesh Manjhi for granting me his precious time for discussing my work, amidst his busy schedule. His inputs provided a concrete direction to my ideas. I would also like to thank the detailed review by the discussant, Prof. Fulvio Castellacci, at the two-day international workshop on ‘The Economics of ICT’ held in February 2018, Delhi. However, I am solely responsible for all the remaining errors and inadequacies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
-
Definitions (Source: www.itu.int and www.data.worldbank.org).
-
Economic growth (GDP) %: The percent change in GDP in a particular quarter from the same quarter in the previous year using constant prices.
-
Percentage of world population: The population share of a particular country is measured as its population as a percent of the total world population in a given year. The total population is based on the de facto definition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal status or citizenship—except for refugees not permanently settled in the country of asylum, who are generally considered part of the population of their country of origin. The values are mid-year estimates.
-
Internet users: The internet users are presented as the percent of people who have access to the Internet at home, at work or in public spaces. Definition: Internet users are individuals who have used the Internet (from any location) in the last 3Â months. The Internet can be used via a computer, mobile phone, personal digital assistant, games machine, digital TV and so on.
-
Fixed broadband Internet subscribers, per 100 people: Fixed broadband subscriptions refer to fixed subscriptions to high-speed access to the public Internet (a TCP/IP connection), at downstream speeds equal to, or greater than, 256Â kbit/s. This includes cable modem, DSL, fibre-to-the-home/building, other fixed (wired)-broadband subscriptions, satellite broadband and terrestrial fixed wireless broadband. This total is measured irrespective of the method of payment. It excludes subscriptions that have access to data communications (including the Internet) via mobile-cellular networks. It should include fixed WiMAX and any other fixed wireless technologies. It includes both residential subscriptions and subscriptions for organisations.
-
Mobile phone subscribers, per 100 people: Mobile cellular telephone subscriptions are subscriptions to a public mobile telephone service that provide access to the PSTN using cellular technology. The indicator includes (and is split into) the number of post-paid subscriptions and the number of active prepaid accounts (i.e. those that have been used during the last 3Â months). The indicator applies to all mobile cellular subscriptions that offer voice communication. It excludes subscriptions via data cards or USB modems, subscriptions to public mobile data services, private trunked mobile radio, telepoint, radio paging and telemetry services.
-
International Internet bandwidth: International Internet bandwidth is the sum of the capacity of all Internet exchanges offering international bandwidth measured in bits per second (bits/s).
-
Literacy rate: Adult literacy rate is the percentage of people aged 15Â years and above who can both read and write with understanding a short simple statement about their everyday life.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tewathia, N. (2020). Digital Divide: How India and China Stack Up. In: Maiti, D., Castellacci, F., Melchior, A. (eds) Digitalisation and Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9996-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9996-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9995-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9996-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)