Abstract
The literature on the role of information technology outsourcing (ITO) only rarely considers purchasers in developing countries. This is an important omission and even more so in India, which has an IT outsourcing industry that is well placed to bring world-class applications of the technology to domestic firms. This chapter assesses the sector’s role in India using evidence from econometric analysis covering 10,100 firms over 5 years as well as qualitative responses from 29 in-depth interviews. The econometrics shows that there is a strong positive impact of IT outsourcing on output and productivity, and that the effect is bigger than that achieved by buying hardware and software alone. Comparing with studies from around the world also reveals that the effect of ITO in India is typically larger than firms in developed countries achieve with investments into IT—so that ITO facilitates catching up. The qualitative evidence helps to understand why these strong effects occur. It suggests that ITO companies are engaging in a conscious process of learning in both developed markets and India, and that in doing so, they bring innovations to India and assist in adapting them to the local context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Kite (2018) includes a range of econometric tests and robustness exercises to support these findings. These include a first difference model, a Blundell and Bond (1998) estimate which corrects for production function endogeneity, a test for attrition bias in the sample, and estimates by sector, by public versus privately owned firms and by Indian versus foreign-owned firms.
- 3.
Unfortunately, PROWESS does not include a measure of firms’ skill level, although clearly including such a measure would improve the analysis here. Commander et al. (2011) carried out primary research to create a skills profile variable in their study on IT in Brazil and India, this necessitated using a much smaller sample in their econometric work.
- 4.
To protect the identity of interviewees, many of whom are senior professionals in well-known companies, all of their real names have been replaced by pseudonyms.
References
Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46, 386–406.
Arvanitis, S., & Loukis, E. N. (2013). Outsourcing and firm performance—A comparative study of Swiss and Greek firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(3), 771–806.
Baily, N., & Lawrence, R. (2001). Do we have a new e-conomy? The american economic review. Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, 91(2), 308–312.
Banga, R., & Goldar, B. (2004). Contribution of services to output growth and productivity in Indian manufacturing: Pre and post reforms. New-Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Institute of Fiscal Studies, Working Paper, no. W99/4
Bresnahan, T., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339–376.
Brynjolfsson, E., & Yang, S. (1996). Information technology and productivity: A review of the literature advances in computers. Academic Press, 43, 179–214.
CMIE, (2009). PROWESS database, November 2009 Available Online: http://www.cmie.com/.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
Colecchia, A. (2001). The impact of information and communications technologies on output growth: Issues and preliminary findings. In OECD directorate for science, technology, and industry working paper no. 11. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Commander, S., Harrison, R., & Menezes-Filho, N. (2011, May). ICT and productivity in developing countries: New firm-level evidence from Brazil and India. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 528–541.
Crafts, N. (2001). The solow productivity paradox in historical perspective. In Long-Term Trends in the World Economy-Conference Proceedings. University of Copenhagen.
Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2003). Business services in Germany: Bridges for innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 23(2), 1–30.
Daveri, F. (2001). Information technology and growth in Europe. Unpublished. Parma: University of Parma.
den Hertog, P. (2000). Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4, 491–528.
Doloreux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2012). Collaboration, information and the geography of innovation in knowledge intensive business services. Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 79–105.
Gago, D., & Rubalcaba, L. (2007). Innovation and ICT in service firms: Towards a multidimensional approach for impact assessment, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17, 25–44.
Guerrieri, P., Maggi B., Meliciani V., & Padoan, P. C. (2005). Technology diffusion, services, and endogenous growth in Europe: Is the lisbon strategy useful? In IMF working paper WP/05/103, IMF Washington.
Hanna, N. (1994). Exploring information technology for development: A case study of India. In World Bank discussion paper no. 246. Washington DC: The World Bank.
International Monetary Fund, (2001). World economic outlook: The information technology revolution, Chap. 3 (pp. 103–142). Available online http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2001/02/pdf/chapter3.pdf.
Jeong, K., Jeong, H., & Shin, I. (2002). The economic impact of information and communication technology in Korea. In M. Pohjola (Ed.), Information technology, productivity, and economic growth: International evidence and implications for economic development. UNU/WIDER studies in development economics, Oxford University Press.
Jorgenson, D., & Stiroh, K. (1995). Computers and growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(3 & 4), 295–316.
Jorgensen, D., Ho, M., & Stiroh, K. (2007). A retrospective look at the U.S. productivity growth resurgence (Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports No. 277).
Kite, G. (2011). Linkedin: The software and IT services sector in India’s economic development, 1980 to 2011 (PhD thesis). SOAS University of London.
Kite, G. (2013, July 27). The Indian software and information technology services sector: A teacher to treasure, economic and political weekly, 48(30).
Kite, G. (2018). A conduit for knowledge? Demonstrating the strength of technology improvements in Indian firms that buy outsourced information technology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28, 225–243.
Lee, S., Xiang, J., & Kim, J. (2011). Information technology and productivity: Empirical evidence from the Chinese electronics industry. Information & Management, 48(2011), 79–87.
Levina, N., & Ross, J. (2003, September). MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 331–364.
Mody, A., & Dahlman, C. (1992). Performance and potential of information technology: An international perspective. World Development, 20(12), 1703–1719.
Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: The role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 30(9), 1501–1516.
NASSCOM & Delloite. (2008). Indian IT/ITES industry: Impacting economy and society 2007–08. Teen Murti Marg, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi 110021, India: NASSCOM foundation. Available online August 1, 2009 http://www.nasscom.in.
Oliner, S. D., & Sichel, D. E. (1994). Computers and output growth revisited: How big is the puzzle? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1994(2), 273–334.
Oliner, S. D., & Sichel, D. E. (2000). The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: Is information technology the story? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 3–22.
Olsen. (2006). Productivity impacts of offshoring and outsourcing: A review. STI working paper, OECD, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry (STI), vol 2006/1.
Perez, C. (1985). Microelectronics, long waves and world structural change: New perspectives for developing countries. World Development, 13(3), 441–463.
Reserve Bank of India. (2009). Handbook of statistics on Indian economy. Available online December 21, 2009 http://www.rbi.org.in/.
Shearmur, R., & Doloreux, D. (2013). Innovation and knowledge-intensive business service: The contribution of knowledge-intensive business service to innovation in manufacturing establishments. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22, 751–774.
Sichel, D. (1997). Computers and aggregate economic growth. Business Economics, 34(2), 18–24.
Stiroh, K. (2002). Reassessing the role of IT in the production function: A meta analysis. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, mimeo.
Tether, & Hipp. (2002). Knowledge intensive, technical and other services: patterns of competitiveness and innovation compared. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 14(2), 163–182.
Tether, B. S., & Tajar, A. (2008). The organisational-cooperation mode of innovation and its prominence amongst European service firms. Research Policy, 37(4), 720–739.
Thompson, S., Teo, A., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2014). Knowledge transfer and utilization in IT outsourcing partnerships: A preliminary model of antecedents and outcomes. Information & Management, 51, 177–186.
Wood, P. (2005). A service-informed approach to regional innovation—Or adaptation? The Service Industries Journal, 25(4), 429–445.
Wood, P. (2006). The regional significance of knowledge-intensive services in Europe: KISINN and after. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 19(1), 51–66.
World Bank. (2010). World development indicators (2010). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Acknowledgments
With thanks to Simon Commander, Chrisanti Avgerou, Fredrik Tell, Ben Groom, Duo Qin, Arlene Luck and participants at Economics of ICTs (Information and Communication Technologies): Transformation, Digital Divides and Development, Delhi School of Economics 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kite, G. (2020). IT Enabling Indian Firms: The Importance of IT Outsourcing Companies. In: Maiti, D., Castellacci, F., Melchior, A. (eds) Digitalisation and Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9996-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9996-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9995-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9996-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)