Advertisement

Youth Ready for Youth Futures: A Case Study of Project-Based Learning in Youth Work

  • Dianne MackayEmail author
  • Anh Pham
  • Trevor Bayley
Chapter
  • 187 Downloads

Abstract

Youth Work (YW) programmes are designed for students to build a meaningful toolbox that will enable them to have positive learning experiences, in which pedagogy is integrated with theory, content and practice for workplace readiness. The work integrated learning (WIL) project “Youth Ready for Youth Futures”, a project-based WIL placement package, is developed for Youth Work programmes at Diploma and Certificate IV Australian Qualification Framework levels. It aims at providing opportunities for students to belong and engage with disadvantaged young people within communities of placement. Issues addressed in this project include employability skill development, workforce futures and vocational education and training pathways. Notably, WIL is a compulsory part in the Youth Work curriculum. The project is beneficial to YW students as it provides authentic learning experiences and contributes to student networking and professional identity. The cohorts in YW, identified by RMIT University’s previous research, are those who themselves are in the most part, disadvantaged learners; poor experience of learning, language and literacy needs, and low aspirations prior to attending the university. The engagement framework for the WIL project is drawn from re-engagement frameworks in the field, which are seen to be effective in developing the approach for WIL in this case study. In developing the project, a range of youth communities were invited and partnered in co-design and delivery to ensure students engagement with, belonging to, and contextualising their learning with the workplace settings for the best outcomes of their learning and employability. Findings reveal that the project was highly valued by the communities. It provided community groups with a potential source of future staff, access to new knowledge and professional development. The university also benefitted as it facilitated strong partnerships with industry and community, increased retention rates and attracted students to the program. The findings of the case study may be replicated in other settings and transferable to other educational disciplines. The lesson learnt is how we contextualise student senses of belonging and engagement, and those of the young persons who they are supporting in a community youth development placement setting to enhance positive learning experience and positive outcome of WIL placement.

References

  1. Alexiades, J., Gipson, S., & Morey-Nase, G. (2001). Deconstructing the classroom: Situated learning with the help of the World Wide Web. In A. Herrman & M. M. Kulski (Eds.), Expanding horizons in teaching and learning, Proceedings of the 10th Annual Teaching and Learning Forum. Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology.Google Scholar
  2. Davies, M., Lamb, S., & Doecke, E. (2011). Strategic review of effective re-engagement models for disengaged learners. Victoria: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.Google Scholar
  3. Ferns, S. (2014). HERDSA guide: Work integrated learning in curriculum. Australia: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.Google Scholar
  4. Grogan, P., Colvin, K., Rose, J., Morstyn, L., & Atkins, C. (2013). Building the scaffolding: Strenthening support for young people in Victoria. Youth Affairs Council of Victoria: Victoria Council of Social Service.Google Scholar
  5. Karmel, T., & Woods, D. (2008). Second chance vocational education and training. Adelaide, Australia: NCVER.Google Scholar
  6. Roberts, J. W. (2002). Beyond learning by doing: The brain compatible approach. Journal of Experiential Education, 25(2), 281–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Semo, R., & Karmel, T. (2011). Social capital and youth transitions: Do young people’s networks improve their participation in education and training. Adelaide, Australia: NCVER.Google Scholar
  8. Victoria Council of Social Services. (2016). Creating engaging schools for all students and young people: What works. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Government.Google Scholar
  9. Victorian Government. (2008). Vulnerable Youth Framework: Development of a policy framework for Victoria’s vulnerable young people. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Government Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
  10. Vinson, T., Rawsthorne, M., Beavis, A., & Ericson, M. (2015). Dropping off the edge: Persistent communal disadvantage in Australia. Jesuit Social Services/Catholic Social Services Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Wolfe, P., & Brandt, R. (1998). What do we know from brain research? Educational Leadership, 56(3), 8–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations