Advertisement

Enhancing Diversity and Inclusion Through Students’ Transformative Experiences in Prison

  • Marietta MartinovicEmail author
  • Marg Liddell
Chapter
First Online:
  • 194 Downloads

Abstract

The Inside-Out Prison Exchange Program has been delivered at three prisons in Victoria, Australia. The programme includes two diverse student cohorts: incarcerated individuals and RMIT’s criminology and justice students, who study a subject together. The research evaluation of the programme included mixed methods of pre- and post-test quantitative surveys and qualitative focus group interviews with both incarcerated individuals and university students at prisons. The evaluation of the programme demonstrated that studying together empowers incarcerated people as it shows them that their criminal behaviour need not define them. Their transformative learning in the programme helps them imagine a better future for themselves and one which encompasses education and/or employment opportunities, which they thought were unachievable/inaccessible. University students, on the other hand, reconsider what they know about crime and justice and learn about the lived experience of incarcerated individuals before commencing criminal justice careers. University students are also provided with a transformative experience which guides their future decision-making in the criminal justice field. The value of the programme is threefold. First, to RMIT University, demonstrated by a Teaching Excellence Award—Educational Partnerships and Collaborations with Other Organisations and Deputy Vice Chancellor Education’s Award for Good Teaching in 2017. Secondly, incarcerated individuals and university students had a transformative experience which changed perceptions of themselves and each other. Lastly, the community has benefitted as incarcerated individuals may have greater re-integrative prospects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allred, S. (2009). Inside Out Prison Exchange Program: The impact of structure, content, and readings. The Journal of Correctional Education, 60(3), 240–258.Google Scholar
  2. Allred, S., Harrison, D., & O’Connell, D. (2013). Self-efficacy: An important aspect of prison-based learning. The Prison Journal, 93(2), 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2007). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs and crime rates. Olympia, WS: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  4. Boyd, C. (2013). Opened arms, eyes and minds. In S. Davis & B. Roswell (Eds.), Turning teaching Inside Out: A pedagogy of transformation for community-based education (pp. 79–82). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Conti, N., Morrison, L., & Pantaleo, K. (2013). All the wiser: Dialogic space, destigmatization, and teacher-activist recruitment. The Prison Journal, 93(2), 163–188.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885512472654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crabbe, M. (2013). Inside Out in Oregon: Transformative education at the community level. In S. Davis & B. Roswell (Eds.), Turning teaching Inside Out: A pedagogy of transformation for community based education (pp. 27–34). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, L. M., Bozick, R., Steele, J. L., Saunders, J., & Miles, J. N. V. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional education: A meta-analysis of programs that provide education to incarcerated adults. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  8. Dix, M. (2016). The cognitive spectrum of transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 14(2), 139–162.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344615621951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dolnicar, D., Podgornik, B., & Bartol, T. (2016). A comparative study of three teaching methods on student information literacy in stand-alone credit-bearing university courses. Journal of Information Science, 43(5), 601–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haney, C. (2001). From prison to home: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities: The psychological impact of incarceration: Implications for post-prison adjustment. Retrieved from https://aspe.hhs.gov/basic-report/psychological-impact-incarceration-implications-post-prison-adjustment.
  11. Hilinski-Rosick, C., & Blackmer, A. (2014). An exploratory examination of the impact of the Inside Out Prison Exchange Program. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25(3), 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huggins, C. M., & Stametel, J. P. (2015). An exploratory study comparing the effectiveness of lecturing versus team-based learning. Teaching Sociology, 43(3), 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hyatt, S. (2009). Creating social change by teaching behind bars: The Inside Out Prison Exchange Program. Anthopology News, 50(1), 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Inside-Out Centre. (2017). Inside-out at 20: The power of connection and community. A snapshot of the Inside Out Prison Exchange Program. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.Google Scholar
  15. Keen, C., & Woods, R. (2016). Creating activating events for transformative learning in a prison classroom. Journal of Transformative Education, 14(1), 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. King, H., Measham, F., & O’Brian, K. (2019). Building bridges across diversity: Utilising the Inside Out Prison Exchange to promote an egalitarian higher education community with three English prisons. International Journal of Bias, Identify and Diversity in Education, 4(1), 66–81.Google Scholar
  17. Link, T. (2016). Breaking down barriers: Review of the implementation of an Inside/Out Prison Exchange Program in jail setting. Journal of Prison Education and Re-entry, 3(1), 50–54.Google Scholar
  18. Long, D., & Barnes, M. (2016). A pilot evaluation of the Inside Out Prison Exchange Program in the Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Action.Google Scholar
  19. Martinovic, M., Liddell, M., & Muldoon, S. (2017). Evaluation of the inaugural Australian Inside Out Prison Exchange Program. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University.Google Scholar
  20. Martinovic, M., Liddell, M., & Muldoon, S. (2018). Changing views and perceptions: The impact of the Australian Inside Out Prison Exchange Program on students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2018.1543051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58–63.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344603252172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pompa, L. (2002). Service-learning as crucible: Reflection on immersion, context, power, and transformation. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 67–76.Google Scholar
  23. Pompa, L. (2013). One brick at a time: The power and possibility of dialogue across the prison wall. The Prison Journal, 93(2), 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Prompa, L., & Crabbe, M. (2004). The Inside Out Prison Exchange Program: Exploring issues of crime and justice behind the walls. Instructors Manual (Revised ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.Google Scholar
  25. Van Gundy, A., Bryant, A., & Starks, B. (2013). Pushing the envelope for evolution and social change: Critical challenges for teaching Inside Out. The Prison Journal, 93(2), 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Werts, T. (2013). Tyrone Werts: Reflections on the Inside Out Prison Exchange Program. The Prison Journal, 93(2), 135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options