Advertisement

A Research-Led Approach to Authentic Assessment Design for an Introductory Accounting Course

  • Clara NkhomaEmail author
  • Mathews Nkhoma
Chapter
  • 184 Downloads

Abstract

Authentic assessment helps graduates acquire skills that will prepare them for work and help them to handle real-life work scenarios. However, there are few studies and research on practical examples and design of authentic assessment for accounting courses. This chapter discusses how the authors used a research-led approach in designing authentic assessment for an introductory accounting course. After conducting a literature review, a toolkit for authentic assessment design was developed to assist both novices and experts in this area tasked with authentic assessment design. The use of this toolkit led to the development of assessments that aimed to nurture the desirable but often-neglected graduate attributes for accounting and business school students. The authors also discussed the types of authentic assessment that were developed for an introductory accounting course using this toolkit. With an increased assessment of these skills, the need for rubrics was highlighted. It is evident from the authors’ experience that feedback and reflective practices are crucial when implementing authentic assessment.

References

  1. Anderson, J. S., Mohrweis, L. C. (2008). Using rubrics to assess accounting students’ writing, oral presentations, and ethics skills. American Journal of Business Education, 1, 85–94.  https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v1i2.4627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apostolou, B., Dorminey, J. W., Hassell, J. M., & Watson, S. F. (2013). Accounting education literature review (2010–2012). Journal of Accounting Education, 31, 107–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2013.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 205–222.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Boud, D., Bennett, S., Hall, M., & Molloy, E. (2016). Support for assessment practice: Developing the assessment design decisions framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 21, 545–556.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1160217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beeth, M. E., Cross, L., Pearl, C., Pirro, J., Yagnesak, K., Kennedy, J. (2001). A continuum for assessing science process knowledge in grades K-6. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5.Google Scholar
  6. Bisman, J. (2011). Engaged pedagogy: A study of the use of reflective journals in accounting education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903428676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bissell, A. N., & Lemons, P. P. (2006). A new method for assessing critical thinking in the classroom. BioScience, 56, 66–72.  https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056%5b0066:ANMFAC%5d2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, S., Race, P., Smith, B. (2004). 500 tips on assessment. Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bunney, D., Sharplin, E., & Howitt, C. (2015). Generic skills for graduate accountants: The bigger picture, a social and economic imperative in the new knowledge economy. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(2), 256–269.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.956700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cabellero, C. L., Walker, A. (2010). Work readiness in graduate recruitment and selection: A review of current assessment methods. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 1, 13–25.  https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2010vol1no1art546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibbs, G. (2014). Dialogue by design: Creating a dialogic feedback cycle using assessment rubrics. Teaching and Learning Forum. https://clt.curtin.edu.au/events/conferences/tlf/tlf2014/refereed/gibbs.pdf
  12. Gore, J., Ladwig, J., Elsworth, W., Ellis, H. (2009). Quality assessment framework: A guide for assessment practice in higher education. Callaghan: The University of Newcastle. Retrieved May 10, 2014, from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/3623374/QAF_FINAL_doc_for_print.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1524714369&Signature=%2BGSwtkff4E0NwqZdcdNku9dnYK8%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DQUALITY_ASSESSMENT_FRAMEWORK_A_Guide_for.pdf.Google Scholar
  13. Graham, A., Hampton, A., & Willet, C. (2009). What not to write: An interevtnion in written communication skills for accounting students. Journal of Management, 8(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  14. Gulikers, J. T., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hancock, P., Howieson, B., Kavanagh, M., Kent, J., Tempone, I., Segal, N. (2009). Accounting for the future: More than numbers. Australian Teaching and Learning Council.Google Scholar
  16. Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2009). A practical guide to authentic e-learning. Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Holtzblatt, M., & Tschakert, N. (2011). Expanding your accounting classroom with digital video technology. Journal of Accounting Education, 29, 100–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2011.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ingram, R.W., & Frazier, C. (1980). Developing communications skills for the accounting profession. American Accounting Assn.Google Scholar
  19. Inman, B. C., Wenzler, A., & Wickert, P. D. (1989). Square pegs in round holes: Are accounting students well-suited to today’s accounting profession. Issues in Accounting Education, 4, 29–47.Google Scholar
  20. Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kavanagh, M., & Drennan, L. (2008). What skill and attributes does an accounting graduate need? Evidence from student perceptions and employer expectations. Accounting and Finance., 48(2), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kealey, B. T., Holland, J., & Watson, M. (2005). Preliminary evidence on the association between critical thinking and performance in principles of accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 20, 33–49.  https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2005.20.1.33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kearney, S. (2013). Improving engagement: The use of ‘authentic self-and peer-assessment for learning to enhance the student learning experience. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 875–891.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.751963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kienhuis, M., & Chester, A. (2014). Interteaching: A model to enhance student engagement. In M. Gosper & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Curriculum models for the 21st century: Using technologies in higher education (pp. 135–154). Springer, New York, United States.Google Scholar
  25. Killian, L., & Brandon, C. (2009). Using the significant learning taxonomy and active learning to improve accounting education. The Journal of Faculty Development, 23, 30–36.Google Scholar
  26. Kimmel, P. (1995). A framework for incorporating critical thinking into accounting education. Journal of Accounting Education, 13, 299–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0748-5751(95)00012-B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Larkin, T. L. (2014). The student conference: A model of authentic assessment. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 4(2), 36–46.  https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i2.3445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leong, R., & Kavanagh, M. (2013). A work integrated learning (WIL) framework to develop graduate skills and attributes in an Australian university’s accounting program. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14, 1–14.Google Scholar
  29. May, G. S., & Arevalo, C. (1983). Integrating effective writing skills in the accounting curriculum. Journal of Accounting Education, 1, 119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0748-5751(83)90033-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mertler, C. A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7, 1–10.Google Scholar
  31. Montgomery, K. (2002). Authentic tasks and rubrics: Going beyond traditional assessments in college teaching. College Teaching, 50, 34–40.  https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550209595870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nash, G., Crimmins, G., & Oprescu, F. (2016). If first-year students are afraid of public speaking assessments what can teachers do to alleviate such anxiety? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 586–600.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1032212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oliver, B., Whelan, B., Hunter, L., & Hammer, S. (2011). Accounting graduates and the capabilities that count: perceptions of graduates, emplores and accounting academics in four Australian Universities. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 2(1), 2–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nkhoma, C., Nkhoma, M., Tu, K. L. (2018). Authentic assessment design in accounting courses: A literature review. In Proceedings of the Informing Science and Information Technology Education conference. Orlando, Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Institute.Google Scholar
  35. Pantiwati, Y. (2013). Authentic assessment for improving cognitive skill, critical-creative thinking and meta-cognitive awareness. Journal of Education and Practice, 4, 1–9.Google Scholar
  36. Peris-Ortiz, M., Lindahl, J. M. M. (2015). Sustainable learning in higher education: Developing competencies for the global marketplace. Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10804-9.Google Scholar
  37. Rebele, J. E. (1985). An examination of accounting students’ perceptions of the importance of communication skills in public accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 3, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Riley, R. A., Jr., Cadotte, E. R., Bonney, L., & MacGuire, C. (2013). Using a business simulation to enhance accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education, 28, 801–822.  https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodríguez-Gómez, G., Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S. (2015). Assessment as learning and empowerment: Towards sustainable learning in higher education. In M. Peris-Ortiz & J. Merigó Lindahl (Eds.), Sustainable Learning in Higher Education. Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Samkin, G., & Francis, G. (2008). Introducing a learning portfolio in an undergraduate financial accounting course. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 17, 233–271.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280701577460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sampson, D., & Fytros, D. (2008). Competence models in technology-enhanced competence-based learning. In H. H. Adelsberger, Kinshuk, J. M. Pawlowski, & D. G. Sampson (Eds), Handbook on information technologies for education and training. Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74155-8_9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schamber, J. F., Mahoney, S. L. (2006). Assessing and improving the quality of group critical thinking exhibited in the final projects of collaborative learning groups. The Journal of General Education, 103–137.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2006.0025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaw, J. (2007). Demystifying the evaluation process for parents: Rubrics for marking student. In E. Rosenfeld & D. V. Loertscher (Eds.), Toward a 21st-century school library media program (pp. 98–101).Google Scholar
  44. Scouller, K. M., & Prosser, M. (1994). Students’ experiences in studying for multiple choice question examinations. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 267–279.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331381870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Simons, K., Higgins, M., & Lowe, D. (1995). A profile of communication apprehension in accounting majors: Implications for teaching and curriculum revision. Journal of Accounting Education, 13, 159–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0748-5751(95)00001-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sridharan, B., & Mustard, J. (2015). Authentic assessment methods: A practical handbook for teaching staff [Online]. Retrieved 16 May, 2017, from https://blogs.deakin.edu.au/learning-innovations/authentic-assessment-methods-a-practical-handbook-for-teaching-staff/.
  47. Thompson, F., & Washington, H. L. (2015). Critical thinking skills and teaching accounting: A comparative study. Journal of Finance and Accountancy, 19, 1.Google Scholar
  48. Ulinski, M., & O’Callaghan, S. (2002). A comparison of MBA students’ and employers’ perceptions of the value of oral communication skills for employment. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 193–197.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320209599070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Waltman, K., Kahn, A., & Koency, G. (1998). Alternative approaches to scoring: The effects of using different scoring methods on the validity of scores from a performance assessment. CSE Technical Report 488.Google Scholar
  50. Wellington, P., Thomas, I., Powell, I., & Clarke, B. (2002). Authentic assessment applied to engineering and business undergraduate consulting teams. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18, 168–179.Google Scholar
  51. Wiggins, G. (1992). Creating tests worth taking. Educational Leadership, 49, 26–33.Google Scholar
  52. Wiggins, G. P., & Pettibone, T. J. (1995). Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. JSTOR.Google Scholar
  53. Williams, J. R. (1988). A framework for the development of accounting education research. American Accounting Assn.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RMIT University VietnamHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations