Advertisement

Preparing Future Global Management Accountants Through COIL: Evaluation of Processes and Outcomes

  • Lilibeth Jandug-MonteraEmail author
  • Meetu Aggarwal
Chapter
  • 184 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter is an evaluation of the processes and outcomes of the Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) project between the management accounting courses of RMIT Vietnam and RMIT University Melbourne’s Vocational Business Education. COIL is an educational platform that promotes twenty-first century student competencies such as cross-cultural competence, teamwork and problem-solving skills through a collaborative coursework participated by students from different countries. The Learning Outcomes Value Cycle Framework (Gavilanez, Ortlieb, & Carey, 2017) is used to analyse the key components of the project including the project learning outcomes, learning activities and assessments. The 6-week Global COIL Project was designed for students to apply their classroom learning to realistic business scenarios and develop skills necessary in the global workplace. One hundred sixty-one (161) Management Accounting students from the two campuses worked together and communicated virtually in teams using Google Hangouts and other social media technologies to analyse and develop a solution to a simulated business scenario. The component-by-component analysis of the project revealed several pedagogical and practical challenges of COIL project design and implementation. Despite these challenges, COIL proved to be a promising educational platform that provides students with ample opportunities to develop a range of employability skills. This chapter highlights the motivations and challenges of designing and implementing a COIL project. Strategies for enhancement are also identified to ensure achievement of project learning outcomes. This chapter provides a valuable resource for academics who intend to introduce COIL or other cross-cultural collaborative projects in their courses.

References

  1. Australian Government (n.d.). Higher education standards framework. Department of Education and Training. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.au/standards-0.
  2. Assuring Graduate Capabilities. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.assuringgraduatecapabilities.com/about.html.
  3. Bennett, S., Bishop, A., Dalgarno, B., Waycott, J., & Kennedy, G. (2012). Implementing web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 524–534.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brand, H. (2016, June 23). The seven key qualities of accountants of the future. Retrieved from http://www.cityam.com/243910/seven-key-qualities-accountants.
  5. Dacre Pool, L., & Sewell, P. (2007). The key to employability: Developing a practical model of graduate employability. Education + Training49(4), 277–289.Google Scholar
  6. Esche, M. (2018). Incorporating collaborative online international learning (COIL) into study abroad courses: A training design. Capstone Collection. Retrieved from https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/capstones/3096.
  7. Evans, E. (2010). Jurisdictional disputes in accounting: Education or training? In E. Evans, R. Burritt, & J. Guthrie (Eds.), Accounting education at a crossroad in 2010 (pp. 80–89). Sydney: The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.Google Scholar
  8. Gavilanez, P., Ortlieb, A., & Carey, T. (2017). Using a value cycle framework to analyze teamwork capability as a learning outcome in interior design studio courses. In R. Tucker (Ed.) Collaboration and student engagement in design education (pp. 28–54). Hershey, PA: IBHI Global.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0726-0.ch002.
  9. Hancock, P., Freeman M., Watty, K., Birt, J., & Tyler, J. (2016). Accounting learning standards. Retrieved from https://www.afaanz.org/sites/default/files/uploaded-content/website-content/new-teaching-and-learning-standards-final-2016_1.pdf.
  10. Jackson, D. (2013). Business graduate employability – where are we going wrong? Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 776–790.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.709832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jorre de St Jorre, T., & Oliver, B. (2018). Want students to engage? Contextualise graduate learning outcomes and assess for employability. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 44–57.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1339183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kayes, A. B., Kayes, D. C., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Developing teams using the Kolb team learning experience. Simulation & Gaming, 36(3), 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kensington-Miller, B., Knewstubb, B., Longley, A., & Gilbert, A. (2018). From invisible to SEEN: A conceptual framework for identifying, developing and evidencing unassessed graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1439–1453.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1483903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li F., Qi, J., Wang, G., & Wang, X. (2014). Traditional classroom vs e-learning in higher education: Difference between students’ behavioral engagement. IJET, 9(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i2.3268.
  15. Marcillo-Gómez, M., & Desilus, B. (2016). Collaborative online international learning experience in practice opportunities and challenges. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 11(1), 30–35.  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242016000100005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Myers, T., Blackman, A., Andersen, T., Hay, R., Lee, I., & Gray, H. (2014). Cultivating ICT students’ interpersonal skills in online learning environment using traditional active learning techniques. Journal of Learning Design, 7(3). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1048767.pdf.
  17. Oliver, B. (2013). Graduate attributes as a focus for institution-wide curriculum renewal: Innovations and challenges. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(3), 450–463.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.682052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oliver, B. (2015). Redefining graduate employability and work-integrated learning: Proposals for effective higher education in disrupted economies. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 6(1), 56–65.  https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2015vol6no1art573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oliver, B., & Jorre de St Jorre, T. (2018). Graduate attributes for 2020 and beyond: recommendations for Australian higher education providers. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 821–836.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1446415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oliver, B., Whelan, B., Hunt, L., & Hammer, S. (2011). Accounting graduates and the capabilities that count: Perceptions of graduates, employers and accounting academics in four Australian universities. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 2(1), 2–27.  https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2011vol2no1art550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. QILT [Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching]. (n.d.). Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from https://www.qilt.edu.au/.
  22. RMIT University. (n.d.). ACCT2126 Management Accounting and Business Part B Sem 2, 2018. Retrieved from https://rmit.service-now.com/navpage.do.
  23. State University of New York (SUNY) COIL Center. (n.d.). Course models. Retrieved from http://coil.suny.edu/page/course-models.
  24. training.gov.au. (n.d.). Unit of competency details FNSACC507 – Provide management accounting information. Retrieved from https://training.gov.au/Training/Details/FNSACC507.
  25. Tucker, R., & Abbasi, N. (2015). The architecture of teamwork: examining relationships between teaching, assessment, student learning and satisfaction with creative design outcomes. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(6), 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RMIT UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations