Skip to main content

Enhance Lower Secondary Students’ Scientific Literacy and Conceptual Understanding of Tonicity Through Blended Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology in Education: Pedagogical Innovations (ICTE 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1048))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Common difficulties for learning biology, for example, imagination of microscopic phenomena, integration of multiple concepts and understanding of technical terms, have long existed across educational levels. These challenges do not only make biology less approachable, but also affect students’ scientific literacy. Hence, this study aims to develop a blended learning activity consisting of digital media and a card game to support student understanding of tonicity as well as promote scientific literacy. Digital media are developed to visualise and conceptualise the microscopic mechanism of tonicity, which is expected to be less time consuming and more engaging. In addition, a card game activity that includes multiple concepts, pictorial representations and technical terms on tonicity is developed to promote abstract understanding among learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen, W.A., Smith, A.R.: Effects of video podcasting on psychomotor and cognitive performance, attitudes and study behavior of student physical therapists. Innov. Educ. Teaching Int. 49, 401–414 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.728876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Çimer, A.: What makes biology learning difficult and effective: students’ views. Educ. Res. Rev. 7(3), 61 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedler, Y., Amir, R., Tamir, P.: High school students’ difficulties in understanding osmosis. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 9, 541–551 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedrichsen, P., Pallant, A.: French fries, dialysis tubing & computer models: teaching diffusion & osmosis through inquiry & modeling. Am. Biol. Teacher 69(2), 22–27 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1662/00027685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fulya, O.: How do high school students know diffusion and osmosis? High school students’ difficulties in understanding diffusion & osmosis. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 116(21), 3679–3682 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo, P.J., Kim, J., Robin, R.: How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. In: ACM Conference on Learning at Scale (L@S 2014) (2014). http://groups.csail.mit.edu/uid/otherpubs/las2014-pguo-engagement.pdf

  7. Hsin, W.J., Cigas, J.: Short videos improve student learning in online education. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 28, 253–259 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lawson, E.A.: A learning cycle approach to introducing osmosis. Am. Biol. Teacher 62(3), 189–196 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/4450871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. National Research Council: National Science Education Standards. The National Academies Press, Washington (1996). https://doi.org/10.17226/4962

  10. Santangelo, T., Harris, K., and Graham, S.: Self-regulated strategy development: a validated model to support students who struggle with writing. Learn. Disabil. Contemp. J. 5(1), 1–20 (2007). http://www.ldam.org

  11. Schmid, R.F., et al.: The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: A meta-analysis of classroom applications. Comput. Educ. 72, 271–291 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology Ministry of Education Thailand. (2008). Basic Science of Mathayom Suksa I No. 2 Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D.2008). http://www.scimath.org/ebooks/item/6794-1-2-6794

  13. Wood-Robinson, C.: Osmosis in the balance. J. Biol. Educ. 35(2), 98–99 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zuckerman, J.: Representations of an osmosis problem. Am. Biol. Teacher 60(1), 27–30 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/4450407

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pratchayapong Yasri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Seangdeang, K., Yasri, P. (2019). Enhance Lower Secondary Students’ Scientific Literacy and Conceptual Understanding of Tonicity Through Blended Learning. In: Cheung, S., Jiao, J., Lee, LK., Zhang, X., Li, K., Zhan, Z. (eds) Technology in Education: Pedagogical Innovations. ICTE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1048. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9895-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9895-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9894-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9895-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics