Skip to main content

Cerclage 2: Abdominal vs Vaginal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Preterm Labor and Delivery

Part of the book series: Comprehensive Gynecology and Obstetrics ((CGO))

  • 722 Accesses

Abstract

Cervical cerclage to prevent preterm labor in cervical incompetence is performed transvaginally or transabdominally, with the transvaginal method generally used. Transabdominal cerclage is a more invasive procedure than transvaginal cerclage and is performed in patients for whom transvaginal cerclage is difficult. It is recommended that the transvaginal procedure be performed at 12–14 weeks of pregnancy and that transabdominal cerclage be performed up to week 12. Although both procedures carry a risk of hemorrhage and premature rupture of the membranes, with transabdominal cerclage in particular there is a risk of problems such as adhesion formation resulting from repeated laparotomy. In managing postoperative care after both procedures, caution is exercised with respect to symptoms of threatened miscarriage or preterm labor. Although the suture is removed at 36–37 weeks of pregnancy with transvaginal cerclage, transabdominal cerclage requires laparotomy to remove the suture, and delivery is therefore performed by Cesarean section. It has been noted that, in patients with a disturbance of the vaginal flora, transvaginal cerclage may worsen local infection and increase the rate of preterm labor. Because transabdominal cerclage can be performed under sterile conditions, it may be useful in patients with local infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shirodkar VN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic. 1955;52:299.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mcdonald IA. Angular pregnancy: a case report with a brief review of the literature. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957;64:712–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benson RC, et al. Transabdominal cervico uterine cerclage during pregnancy for the treatment of cervical incompetency. Obstet Gynecol. 1965;25:145–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:516.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Owen J, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:375.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ehsanipoor RM, et al. Physical examination-indicated cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Odibo AO, et al. Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length. Am J Perinatol. 2007;24:55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hume H, et al. Ultrasound-indicated cerclage: Shirodkar vs. McDonald. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:2690–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Novy MJ. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage: a reappraisal 25 years after its introduction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:1635–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Akeno K, Sameshima H. Transabdominal cerclage. Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2016;70:49–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tulandi T, et al. Pre and post-conceptional abdominal cerclage by laparoscopy or laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilstrap L, et al. Operative obstetrics. Columbus: McGraw-Hill Education; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burger NB, et al. Preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a multicenter cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:273.e1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harger JH. Cerclage and cervical insufficiency: an evidence-based analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:1313.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bauer ME, et al. Maternal sepsis mortality and morbidity during hospitalization for delivery: temporal trends and independent associations for severe sepsis. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:944–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barth WH Jr. Cervical incompetence and cerclage: unresolved controversies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;37:831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Norwitz ER, et al. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage: placing the stitch before conception. J Gynecol Tech. 1997;3:53.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Debbs RH, et al. Transabdominal cerclage after comprehensive evaluation of women with previous unsuccessful transvaginal cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:317.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Foster TL, et al. Operative complications and fetal morbidity encountered in 300 prophylactic transabdominal cervical cerclage procedures by one obstetric surgeon. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31:713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bisulli M, et al. Interval to spontaneous delivery after elective removal of cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:163.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuhn RPJ, et al. Cervical ligation: a review of 242 pregnancies. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol. 1977;17(2):79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grant AM. Cervical cerclage. In: Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP, editors. Pregnancy and childbirth module. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Blickstein I, et al. The outcome of pregnancies complicated by preterm rupture of the membranes with and without cerclage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1989;28:237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McElrath TF, et al. Management of cervical cerclage and preterm premature rupture of the membranes: should the stitch be removed? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:840.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jenkins TM, et al. Timing of cerclage removal after preterm premature rupture of membranes: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:847.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Galyean A, et al. Removal versus retention of cerclage in preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:399.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hawkins E, et al. Vaginal erosion of an abdominal cerclage 7 years after laparoscopic placement. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:420–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakai M, et al. Evaluation of effectiveness of prophylactic cerclage of a short cervix according to interleukin-8 in cervical mucus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:14–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keiko Akeno M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Akeno, K. (2020). Cerclage 2: Abdominal vs Vaginal. In: Sameshima, H. (eds) Preterm Labor and Delivery. Comprehensive Gynecology and Obstetrics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9875-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9875-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9874-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9875-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics