Abstract
In this chapter, we address the educational outcomes of students with low socioeconomic status (SES), both Dutch and with an immigrant background. We indicate how these outcomes have developed over time, and how this development might be related to educational policy measures that seek to enhance the educational opportunities for students with a disadvantaged background. We start with a description of the Dutch school structure and note that the highly tracked secondary school level and high school autonomy are significant features. Next, we provide a short description of the share of low SES parents and primary school students, and how these have evolved over time during the period 2008–2017, while distinguishing between Dutch and immigrant background. The main body of the chapter provides an overview of the outcomes of low SES and immigrant students in primary and secondary education. Finally, we critically comment on the effectiveness and efficiency of the Dutch educational equity policy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Attainment indicators refer to formal levels of education; achievement indicators are based on test scores or examination marks.
References
Ali, J., & McInerney, D. M. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of school motivation. In H. W. Marsh, J. Baumert, G. E. Richards, & U. Trautwein (Eds.), Self-concept, motivation and identity: Where to from here? Sydney, Australia: SELF Research Centre, University of Western Sydney. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314434491/download.
Central Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2018, August 14). Statline: Bevolking; onderwijsniveau; geslacht, leeftijd en migratieachtergrond [Population; education level; sex, age and migration background]. Retrieved from http://statline.cbs.nl/Statweb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=82275NED&D1=0&D2=0&D3=1&D4=1,4-5&D5=0-1,7,12,l&D6=39,44,49,54,59,64,69,74-75&HDR=T,G1,G5,G2&STB=G3,G4&VW=T.
Centraal Planbureau. (2016). Kansrijk Onderwijsbeleid [Promising education policy]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Author. Retrieved from https://www.cpb.nl/publicatie/kansrijk-onderwijsbeleid.
Ditton, H., Krüsken, J., & Schauenberg, M. (2005). Bildungsungleichheit – der Beitrag von Familie und Schule. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8, 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-005-0138-x.
Driessen, G. (2013). De bestrijding van Onderwijsachterstanden [Fighting educational inequality: A review of effective approaches]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: ITS.
Driessen, G. (2018, April 1). Zo doorgaan met het onderwijsachterstandsbeleid [Should we carry on with the educational priority in this way?] [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://didactiefonline.nl/blog/blonz/zo-doorgaan-met-het-onderwijsachterstandenbeleid.
Driessen, G., Elshof, D., Mulder, L., & Roeleveld, J. (2015). Cohortonderzoek COOL5−18. Technisch rapport basisonderwijs, derde meting [COOL5−18 cohort study: Technical report primary education, third measurement]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kohnstamm Instituut. Retrieved from https://www.bvekennis.nl/Bibliotheek/16-1106.pdf.
Driessen, G., & Mulder, L. (1999). The enhancement of educational opportunities of disadvantaged children. In R. J. Bosker, B. P. M. Creemers, & S. Stringfield (Eds.), Enhancing educational excellence, equity and efficiency. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer.
Driessen, G., Mulder, L., Ledoux, G., Roeleveld, J., & Van der Veen, I. (2009). Cohortonderzoek COOL5−18. Technisch rapport basisonderwijs, eerste meting 2007/08 [COOL5−18 cohort study: Technical report primary education, first measurement 2007/08]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: SCO-Kohnstamm Instituut.
Driessen, G., Mulder, L., & Roeleveld, J. (2012). Cohortonderzoek COOL5−18. Technisch rapport basisonderwijs, tweede meting 2010/11 [COOL5−18 cohort study: Technical report primary education, second measurement 2010/11]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kohnstamm Instituut.
Dronkers, J., van Erp, M., Robijns, M., & Roeleveld, J. (1998). Krijgen leerlingen in de grote steden en met name in Amsterdam te hoge adviezen? De relaties tussen taal- en rekenscores en advies binnen en buiten de Randstad onderzocht, Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 23, 17–30.
Feskens, R., Kuhlemeier, H., & Limpens, G. (2016). Resultaten PISA 2015 in vogelvlucht. Kennis en vaardigheden van 15-jarigen. [PISA 2015 results in bird’s eye view: Knowledge and skills of 15-year-olds]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito. Retrieved from https://www.lezenenschrijven.nl/uploads/editor/resultaten-pisa-2015-in-vogelvlucht.pdf.
Hillmert, S., & Jacob, M. (2010). Selections and social selectivity on the academic track: A lifecourse analysis of educational attainment in Germany. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2009.12.006.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2014). De Staat van het Onderwijs 2012/2013 [The state of education 2012/2013]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2017). Technisch rapport hoofdstuk 1—Gelijke kansen. De Staat van het Onderwijs 2015/2016 [Technical report chapter 1—Equal opportunities. The state of education 2015/2016]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
Inspectorate of Education. (2017). Technisch rapport Hoofdstuk 1 - Gelijke kansen. De Staat van het Onderwijs 2015/2016. Utrecht: Author.
Korpershoek, H., Naaijer, H. M., & Bosker, R. J. (2016). De inrichting van de onderbouw: Onderzoek naar de motieven en de beweegredenen van vo-scholen naar soort brugklas [The layout of the substructure: Research into the motives of secondary schools by type of bridge class]. Groningen, The Netherlands: GION onderzoek/onderwijs.
Ministry of Education. (2008). Parlementair onderzoek Onderwijsvernieuwingen [Parliamentary study on educational innovations]. Kamerstukken II 2007–2008, 31 007, nr. 8.
Mulder, L., & Meijnen, W. (2013). Onderwijsachterstanden in de BOPO-periode, 2009–2012. Een review [Inequality in primary education in the period 2009- 2011. A review study]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: ITS.
Nusche, D., Braun, H., Halasz, G., & Santiago, P. (2014). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: Netherlands 2014. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity (Vol. II). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016a). Netherlands 2016: Foundations for the future—Reviews of national policies for education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19900198.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016b). PISA 2015 results: Excellence through equity (Vol. I). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
Peetsma, T. T. D., Wagenaar, E., & De Kat, E. (2001). School motivation, future time perspective and well-being of high school students in segregated and integrated schools in the Netherlands and the role of ethnic self-description. In J. K. Koppen, I. Lunt, & C. Wulf (Eds.), Education in Europe: Cultures, values, institutions in transition (pp. 54–74). New York, NY: Waxmann.
Scheerens, J. (1987). Enhancing opportunities for disadvantaged learners: A review of Dutch research on compensatory education and educational development policy. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Pub. Co.
Scheerens, J. (2013). Educational Evaluation and Assessment in the Netherlands. Addendum to the Country Background Report for the OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes. www.oecd.org/education/school/Netherlands%20CBR%20Update.pdf.
Scheerens, J. (2014). Country report on The Netherlands, concerning equity oriented educational policies and programs. Contribution to the network of experts on social aspects of education and training (NESET) under the auspices of the European Commission. Unpublished manuscript.
Scheerens, J., & Doolaard, S. (2013). Review study on educational quality of Dutch primary schools. Enschede, The Netherlands: GION/University of Twente.
Scheerens, J., Ehren, M., Sleegers, P., & De Leeuw, R. (2012). Country background report for the OECD study on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.sici-inspectorates.eu/getattachment/caf46482-5270-4bc6-b985-2bdf75b57e5f.
Timmermans, A. C., de Boer, H., Amsing, H. T. A., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (In press). Track recommendations bias: Gender, migration background and SES bias over a twenty-year period in the Dutch context. British Educational Research Journal. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11370/30914514-de3f-4388-93e8-1b64542d252b.
Timmermans, A. C., de Boer, H., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2016). An investigation of the relationship between teachers’ expectations and teachers’ perceptions of student attributes. Social Psychology of Education, 19(2), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9326-6.
Timmermans, A., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. (2013). Schooladviezen en onderwijsloopbanen: Voorkomen, risicofactoren en gevolgen van onder- en overadvisering [School recommendations and educational careers: Prevention, risk factors and consequences of under- and over-advice]. Groningen, The Netherlands: GION/RUG Onderwijskunde.
Timmermans, A. C., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. (2015). Accurate, inaccurate, or biased teacher expectations: Do Dutch teachers differ in their expectations at the end of primary education? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12087.
Vugteveen, J., Timmermans, A. C., Korpershoek, H., van Rooijen, M., & Opdenakker, M.-C. (2016). Overgangen en aansluitingen in het onderwijs: Deelrapportage 3: empirische studie naar de cognitieve en niet-cognitieve ontwikkeling van leerlingen rondom de vmbo-mbo overgang [Transitions and connections in education: Partial report 3: empirical study on the cognitive and non-cognitive development of pupils around the vmbo-mbo transition]. Groningen, The Netherlands: GION onderzoek/onderwijs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scheerens, J., Timmermans, A., van der Werf, G. (2019). Socioeconomic Inequality and Student Outcomes in the Netherlands. In: Volante, L., Schnepf, S., Jerrim, J., Klinger, D. (eds) Socioeconomic Inequality and Student Outcomes. Education Policy & Social Inequality, vol 4. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9863-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9863-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9862-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9863-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)