Advertisement

Socioeconomic Inequality and Student Outcomes in Spanish Schools

  • Álvaro ChoiEmail author
  • Jorge Calero
Chapter
  • 392 Downloads
Part of the Education Policy & Social Inequality book series (EPSI, volume 4)

Abstract

International assessments show that the performance of Spanish students in core cognitive competencies is close to the international average and its socioeconomic gradient is below the mean of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. Additionally, the performance gap between students in socioeconomically advantaged and socioeconomically disadvantaged schools is relatively small. While these may be seen as remarkable facts, given the comparatively low socioeconomic level of Spanish families and the depth of the scars of the economic crisis, a closer look uncovers a more complex reality. For example, the likelihood of low performance and grade repetition among socioeconomically disadvantaged students relative to non-disadvantaged students is high and important differences across regions still prevail. In this chapter, we describe the recent evolution and situation of socioeconomic inequalities of school-aged Spanish students and discuss the policies that have been applied to tackle the socioeconomic-based performance gap. These policies have been developed within the framework of changing state-level general education acts and designed and applied at the regional level.

Keywords

Student achievement Socioeconomic status Inequality Spain 

References

  1. Aparicio-Fenoll, A. (2016). Returns to education and educational outcomes: The case of the Spanish housing boom. Journal of Human Capital, 10(2), 235–265.  https://doi.org/10.1086/686154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkowitz, R., Moore, H., Astor, R. A., & Benbenishty, R. (2017). A research synthesis of the associations between socioeconomic background, inequality, school climate, and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 425–469.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calero, J., & Escardíbul, J. O. (2017). La calidad del profesorado en la adquisición de competencias de los alumnos. Un análisis basado en PIRLS-2011. Madrid, Spain: Fundación Ramón Areces, Fundación Europea Sociedad y Educación. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/efse/docs/la-calidad-del-profesorado.
  4. Choi, Á., & Calero, J. (2013). Determinantes del riesgo de fracaso escolar en España en PISA-2009 y propuestas de reforma. Revista de Educación, 362, 562–593.  https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2013-362-242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi, Á., Gil, M., Mediavilla, M., & Valbuena, J. (2017). The evolution of educational inequalities in Spain: Dynamic evidence from repeated cross-sections. Social Indicators Research, 138(3), 853–872.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1701-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi, Á., & Jerrim, J. (2016). The use (and misuse) of PISA in guiding policy reform: The case of Spain. Comparative Education, 52(2), 230–245.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1142739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guio, J., Choi, Á., & Escardíbul, J.-O. (2018). Labor markets, academic performance and school dropout risk: Evidence for Spain. International Journal of Manpower, 39(2), 301–318.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-08-2016-0158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Manacorda, M. (2012). The cost of grade retention. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(2), 596–606.  https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. (2010). Pacto social y político por la educación. Madrid, Spain: Author. Retrieved from http://www.apega.org/attachments/article/254/pacto-educativo-final-22-abril.pdf.
  10. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. (2013). El alumnado gitano en secundaria. Un estudio comparado. Madrid, Spain: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gitanos.org/upload/92/20/EstudioSecundaria.pdf.
  11. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. (2017). Sistema estatal de indicadores de la educación. Edición 2017. Madrid, Spain: Author. Retrieved from http://www.mecd.gob.es/dctm/inee/indicadores/2017/2017-seie-final-21-julio-2017.pdf?documentId=0901e72b8260b0e1.
  12. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016a). PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016b). PISA 2015 results (Volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264267510-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ou, S.-R., & Reynolds, A. J. (2008). Predictors of educational attainment in the Chicago longitudinal study. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 199–229.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.2.199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schleicher, A. (2007). Can competencies assessed by PISA be considered the fundamental school knowledge 15-year-olds should possess? Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 349–357.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-007-9042-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zinovyeva, N., Felgueroso, F., & Vazquez, P. (2014). Immigration and student achievement in Spain: Evidence from PISA. SERIEs—Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, 5(1), 25–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations