Socioeconomic Inequality and Student Outcomes in English Schools
- 435 Downloads
This chapter explores socioeconomic inequality in educational outcomes in England. We begin by describing the key features of the English education system and highlight the characteristics of the student population. We explore the educational outcomes of socioeconomically disadvantaged young people through comparison of a number of different outcomes during educational careers. We analyze policies introduced or mooted in recent years to consider the extent to which they are likely to address these challenges successfully. These include the introduction of “academy” schools, reforms to the school curriculum, changes to education funding, the potential (re-)growth of academically selective schooling, increased investment in early years education, and an increased focused on gathering and disseminating robust evidence on “what works” in educational attainment. Many of these changes seem unlikely to hold many lessons for other countries wishing to reduce attainment gaps. However, there are notable exceptions, particularly regarding early years’ education and improving the evidence base on what practical changes schools can make to promote attainment among those from disadvantaged backgrounds.
KeywordsStudent achievement Socioeconomic status Inequality England
- Anders, J., Brown, C., Ehren, M., Greany, T., Nelson, R., Heal, J., Groot, A., Sanders, M., & Allen, R. (2017). Evaluation of complex whole-school interventions: Methodological and practical considerations. Report to the Education Endowment Foundation.Google Scholar
- Anders, J., & Jerrim, J. (2017). The socio-economic gradient in educational attainment and labour market outcomes: A cross-national comparison. In I. Schoon & R. K. Silbereisen (Eds.), Pathways to adulthood: Social inequalities, structure and agency and social change (pp. 25–50). London, UK: UCL IOE Press.Google Scholar
- Andrews, J., Hutchinson, J., & Johnes, R., (2018). Grammar schools and social mobility. London, UK: Education Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://epi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Grammar-schools-and-social-mobility_.pdf.
- Andrews, J., Robinson, D., & Hutchinson, J. (2017). Closing the gap? Trends in educational attainment and disadvantage. London, UK: Education Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://epi.org.uk/publications-and-research/closing-gap-trends-educational-attainment-disadvantage/.
- Bernardinelli, D., Rutt, S., Greany, T., & Higham, R. (2018). Multi-academy trusts: Do they make a difference to pupil outcomes?. London, UK: UCL IOE Press.Google Scholar
- Burgess, S., Dickson, M., & Macmillan, L. (2014). Selective schooling systems increase inequality (DoQSS Working Paper 14-09). London, UK: UCL Institute of Education. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/s/qss/dqsswp.html.
- Department for Education. (2010). Provision for children under five years of age in England—January 2010. London, UK: Author. Retrieved from https://data.gov.uk/dataset/d3954344-470b-4e5d-8bf4-6b4f77c0f6c4/provision-for-children-under-five-years-of-age-in-england.
- Department for Education. (2014). Measuring disadvantaged pupils’ attainment gaps over time (Statistical Working Paper SFR 40/2014). London, UK: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/measuring-disadvantaged-pupils-attainment-gaps-over-time.
- Department for Education. (2015). Education provision: Children under 5 years of age, January 2015. London, UK: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/provision-for-children-under-5-years-of-age-january-2015.
- Department for Education. (2017a). Destinations of key stage 4 and key stage 5 students, England, 2015/16. London, UK: Author. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/651012/SFR56_2017_Main_Text.pdf.
- Department for Education. (2017b). National curriculum assessments at key stage 2 in England, 2017 (revised). London, UK: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/667372/SFR69_2017_text.pdf.
- Department for Education. (2017c). Participation rates in higher education: Academic years 2006/2007–2015/2016 (provisional). London, UK: Author. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/648165/HEIPR_PUBLICATION_2015-16.pdf.
- Department for Education. (2017d). Schools, pupils and their characteristics: January 2017 (SFR 28.2017). London, UK: Author. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/650547/SFR28_2017_Main_Text.pdf.
- Department for Education. (2018a). Pupil premium: Funding and accountability for schools. London, UK: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/guidance/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and-alternative-provision-settings#funding-for-financial-year-2016-to-2017.
- Department for Education. (2018b). Revised 2018 GCSE and equivalent results in England, 2016 to 2017 (SFR01/2017). London, UK: Author. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/676596/SFR01_2018.pdf.
- Department for Work and Pensions. (2017a). Households below average income: 1994/95 to 2015/16. London, UK: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/households-below-average-income-199495-to-201516.
- Department for Work and Pensions. (2017b). Households below average income: 1994/95 to 2016/17. London, UK: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/691899/directory-of-tables-hbai-2016-17.ods.
- Education Endowment Foundation. (2017). The attainment gap//2017. Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Annual_Reports/EEF_Attainment_Gap_Report_2018_-_print.pdf.
- Eyles, A., & Machin, S. (2015). The introduction of academy schools to England’s education. London, UK: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
- Eyles, A., Machin, S., & Silva, O. (2015). Academies 2: The new batch (CEP Discussion Paper No. 1370). London, UK: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics. Retrieved from http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1370.pdf.
- Greany, T., & Higham, R. (2018). Hierarchy, markets and networks: Analysing the “self-improving school-led system” agenda in Britain and the implications for schools. London, UK: UCL IOE Press.Google Scholar
- Holmlund, H., McNally, S., & Viarengo, M. (2008). Impact of school resources on attainment at key stage 2 (DCSF Research Report No. RR043). London, UK: Department for Children, Schools and Families.Google Scholar
- House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts. (2015). Funding for disadvantaged pupils: Third Report of Session 2015–16. London, UK: The Stationery Office Limited. Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmselect/cmpubacc/327/327.pdf.
- Jerrim, J., & Sims, S. (2018, March). Why do so few low and middle-income children attend a grammar school? New evidence from the Millennium Cohort Study. Retrieved from https://johnjerrim.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/working_paper_nuffield_version_clean.pdf.
- Machin, S., & Silva, O. (2013, March). School structure, school autonomy and the tail (CEP Special Paper No. 29). Retrieved from http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/special/cepsp29.pdf.
- Machin, S., & Vernoit, J. (2012). Changing school autonomy: Academy schools and their introduction to England’s education (CEE Discussion Paper No. 123). Retrieved from http://cee.lse.ac.uk/ceedps/ceedp123.pdf.
- McDool, E. (2016). The effect of primary converter academies on pupil performance (Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series No. 2016013). Retrieved from https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.670238!/file/paper_2016013.pdf.
- McGuinness, F. (2018). Poverty in the UK: Statistics (House of Commons Library Briefing Paper No. 7096). Retrieved from http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN07096/SN07096.pdf.
- Nicoletti, C., & Rabe, B. (2014). Spending it wisely: How can schools use their resources to help poorer pupils? Colchester, UK: Institute for Social and Economic Research. Retrieved from https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/files/news/2014/spending-it-wisely.pdf.
- Office of National Statistics. (2017). Statistical bulletin: Families and households: 2017. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/families/bulletins/familiesandhouseholds/2017.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). PISA 2012 results: What makes schools successful? Resources, policies and practices (Vol. IV). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-IV.pdf.
- Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Roberts, N. (2018). The school curriculum in England (House of Commons Library Briefing Paper No. 06798). Retrieved from http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06798/SN06798.pdf
- Schneider, S. L. (2008). The application of the ISCED-97 to the UK’s educational qualifications. In S. L. Schneider (Ed.), The International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED-97): An evaluation of content and criterion validity for 15 European countries (pp. 281–300). Mannheim, Germany: MZES. Retrieved from https://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/publications/misc/isced_97/schn08e_the_application_of_the_isced-97_to_the_uks_educat.pdf.
- Sibieta, L., Chowdry, H., & Muriel, A. (2008). Level playing field? The implications of school funding (CfBT Education Trust Research Paper). Retrieved from https://www.ifs.org.uk/docs/level_playing.pdf.
- Social Mobility Commission. (2016). State of the nation 2016: Social mobility in Great Britain. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/569410/Social_Mobility_Commission_2016_REPORT_WEB_1.pdf.
- Stewart, K., & Obolenskaya, P. (2016). Young children. In R. Lupton, T. Burchardt, J. Hills, K. Stewart, & P. Vizard (Eds.), Social policy in a cold climate: Policies and their consequences since the crisis (pp. 35–58). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
- The Sutton Trust. (2012). NFER Teacher Voice Omnibus 2012: The use of the Pupil Premium. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research. Retrieved from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/91062/91062.pdf.
- Whitty, G. (2010, July). Who you know, what you know or knowing the ropes? New evidence in the widening participation debate. Paper presented at the Festival of Education, Wellington College, Crowthorne, UK.Google Scholar
- Williams, M., & Grayson, H. (2018). School funding in England since 2010—What the key evidence tells us. Slough, UK: NFER.Google Scholar