Research on the Regional Industrial Coordinated Development and Spatial Distribution Strategy

  • Liu JingEmail author
Part of the Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path book series (RSCDCDP)


Based on the theory of endogenous growth, the formation and evolution of the inter-regional division of labor and trade relations and the exploration of the new theory of economic geography, we empirically analyzed and investigated the intrinsic law of coordinated development of regional industries and reasonable spatial layout. The data of the Pearl River Delta from 2002 to 2010 and Shenzhen, Dongguan and Huizhou from 2004 to 2010 were selected to analyze the panel data model. The empirical analysis indicated that the industrial similarity of the Pearl River Delta had a positive relationship with economic growth. The system of estimation of the degree of coordination of regional industrial development was constructed, and the results revealed that the overall coordination of manufacturing development in Shenzhen, Dongguan and Huizhou showed a good upward trend. Taking Shenzhen, Dongguan and Huizhou as an example, we explored the coordinated development of regional industries and spatial layout strategies, and proposed a reasonable layout of large-scale industrial clusters and related policy suggestions based on the developmental strategy of city clusters, with a view to providing new ideas for the sustainable growth of regional economy with endogenous dynamics.


Regional industries Coordination Spatial layout Industrial cluster Strategy 


  1. 1.
    Weng Jichuan, An Analysis on Assimilated Industrial Structures in the Pearl River Delta, World Regional Studies, 2006(1).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang Yongfu, The Change of Governmental Functions: the Crux in the Economic Integration of the Pearl River Delta Area, Academic Research, 2009(8).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martin, R., and Sunley, P. Paul Krugman’s Geographical Economics and its Implications for Regional Development Theory: A Critical Assessment. Economic Geography, 1996, 72, (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Michael E. Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 2000, pp. 15–22.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Porter, M.E. (1998). Cluster and New Economics of Competition, Harvard Business Review 11.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yang Xiaokai, Principles of Economics, Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang Xiaokai, New Classical Economics and Inframarginal Analysis, China Renmin University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang Kaizhong, Towards Space Integration – China’s Market Economy and Regional Development Strategy, Chengdu: Sichuan People’s Publishing House, 1993.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Isard, W. Further thoughts on future directions for regional science [M]. M.I.T. Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fujita. Remarks on the general theory of location and space-economy [J]. Annals of Regional Science, 1999, 33: 383–388.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ohlin, Bertli, Interregional and Inter-national Trade [M], Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krugman P. Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade [J]. American Economic Review, 1980, (70): 950–959.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krugman, P. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography [J]. Journal of Development Economics, 1991a, 49 (1): 137–150.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Venables, A. Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries [J]. International Economic Review, 1996, 37 (2): 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krugman, P. Geography and Trade [M], MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991b.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Social Sciences Academic Press 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Hong Kong, Macao & SEZs EconomyJinan UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations