Skip to main content

The Revenge of Malthus: Pax Indo-Pacifica and Rhizomatic Order

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Indo-Pacific: Trump, China, and the New Struggle for Global Mastery
  • 701 Accesses

Abstract

Drawing on the works of diverse thinkers, ranging from Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari to Yuval Noah Harari, Francis Fukuyama, Robert Kaplan, Samuel Huntington and Naim Moises, the chapter looks at the longue duree future of the Indo-Pacific security architecture. In particular, it focuses on the likely impact of worsening climate change and disruptive technological innovation on nation-states across the mega-region, and how this necessitates the creation of increasingly robust and nimble patterns of cooperation among regional powers. The chapter looks at the severe vulnerability of the region to the mega-challenges of the twenty-first century, and how this could completely transform nations across the Indo-Pacific as well as their interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rees (2004).

  2. 2.

    Malthus (2007).

  3. 3.

    Kaplan (2001).

  4. 4.

    King (2019).

  5. 5.

    Sharma (2012).

  6. 6.

    Prashad (2014).

  7. 7.

    Baldwin (2016).

  8. 8.

    Bolwell (2019).

  9. 9.

    Rachman (2017).

  10. 10.

    Khanna (2019).

  11. 11.

    Wallace-Wells (2017).

  12. 12.

    Friedrich et al. (2017).

  13. 13.

    McCarthy (2014).

  14. 14.

    Leprince-Ringuet (2018).

  15. 15.

    Wallace-Wells (2017).

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Osnos (2017).

  18. 18.

    Ibid.

  19. 19.

    Fox-Skelly (2017).

  20. 20.

    Wallace-Wells (2019a).

  21. 21.

    Roberts (2018).

  22. 22.

    Friedman (2018).

  23. 23.

    Kolbert (2014).

  24. 24.

    Kaplan (2011a).

  25. 25.

    World Wildlife Fund (2018).

  26. 26.

    Carrington (2018).

  27. 27.

    CAIT (l.a. 2019).

  28. 28.

    Sieg and Takenaka (2018).

  29. 29.

    He et al. (2018).

  30. 30.

    Ramesh (2008).

  31. 31.

    Leahy (2017).

  32. 32.

    Jaafari (2019).

  33. 33.

    Alterman (2017).

  34. 34.

    CBS News (2017).

  35. 35.

    Wallace-Wells (2017).

  36. 36.

    Hachigian (2015) and Wallace-Wells (2017).

  37. 37.

    Interview with the author, February 9, 2015.

  38. 38.

    Liang and Gomez (2018).

  39. 39.

    Thayer (2018).

  40. 40.

    Heydarian (2015).

  41. 41.

    Shi and Liu (2017).

  42. 42.

    Mogato (2017).

  43. 43.

    Emmers (2017).

  44. 44.

    European Council: Council of the European Union (2019).

  45. 45.

    Interview with author, October 30, 2018.

  46. 46.

    Dobell (2018).

  47. 47.

    Roughneed (2018).

  48. 48.

    Lee (2018).

  49. 49.

    Aravindan (2016).

  50. 50.

    Osnos (2017).

  51. 51.

    Asian Development Bank (2018).

  52. 52.

    Elgat (2017).

  53. 53.

    See for instance Goodwin (2018) and Block (2008).

  54. 54.

    See Karl Polanyi’s meta-historical double-movement analysis and inner contradictions of liberal capitalism in Polanyi (2001).

  55. 55.

    Harvey (1973).

  56. 56.

    Mishra (2017).

  57. 57.

    Ibid.

  58. 58.

    See for instance Brynjolfsson and McAfee (2016).

  59. 59.

    Ibid.

  60. 60.

    Chesney and Citron (2019).

  61. 61.

    The term surveillance capitalism was coined by Harvard academic Shoshana Zuboff see Zuboff (2019).

  62. 62.

    History Matters (l.a. 2019).

  63. 63.

    See Churchwell (2018), Illing (2018), and Snyder (2018).

  64. 64.

    See Mead (2002) and Anderson (2015).

  65. 65.

    Anderson (2015).

  66. 66.

    Interview with author, March 8.

  67. 67.

    Zuboff (2019).

  68. 68.

    Huntington (1993).

  69. 69.

    Huntington (1991).

  70. 70.

    Diamond (2016).

  71. 71.

    Ibid.

  72. 72.

    Dutt (2016).

  73. 73.

    Ikenberry (2018).

  74. 74.

    Acharya (2014, 10).

  75. 75.

    Ibid., 15.

  76. 76.

    Goh (2014, 77–78).

  77. 77.

    De Luce and Williams (2019).

  78. 78.

    Harris (2018).

  79. 79.

    Brennan (2019).

  80. 80.

    See Hartog and Gudkov (2017), Kimmage (2018), and Snyder (2018).

  81. 81.

    Allison (2018).

  82. 82.

    Smith and Townsend (2018).

  83. 83.

    Daalder and Lindsay (2018).

  84. 84.

    Walker and Ludwig (2017).

  85. 85.

    Ibid.

  86. 86.

    Risen (2019).

  87. 87.

    See Heydarian (2019a) and Bremmer (2018).

  88. 88.

    See Johnson (2019) and Friedberg (2018).

  89. 89.

    Tai and Jaques (2019).

  90. 90.

    Putnam et al. (1994).

  91. 91.

    Naím and Toro (2018).

  92. 92.

    Heydarian (2018).

  93. 93.

    See Chellaney (2017), Walker et al. (2018), Daalder and Lindsay (2018), and Huang (2018).

  94. 94.

    Hao (2019).

  95. 95.

    Kirby (2018).

  96. 96.

    Diamond (2016).

  97. 97.

    Friedberg (2018).

  98. 98.

    Ibid.

  99. 99.

    Harari (2018).

  100. 100.

    Tobin (2019).

  101. 101.

    Chen and Lee (2019).

  102. 102.

    Kissinger (2018).

  103. 103.

    Fukuyama (2006).

  104. 104.

    Hegel (2007).

  105. 105.

    Marxists.org (2019, April 30 “The Phenomenology of …”).

  106. 106.

    Fukuyama (2006).

  107. 107.

    See Harari (2015) and Pinker (2012).

  108. 108.

    Kaplan (1994).

  109. 109.

    Creveld (1991).

  110. 110.

    Ibid.

  111. 111.

    Ibid.

  112. 112.

    Huntington (2011, 266).

  113. 113.

    Ibid., 298.

  114. 114.

    Ibid., 266.

  115. 115.

    Ibid., 267.

  116. 116.

    D’Souza (2019).

  117. 117.

    Heydarian (2019b).

  118. 118.

    Michaelson (2017).

  119. 119.

    Otto and Sentana (2018).

  120. 120.

    CNN Newsource (2019).

  121. 121.

    McKirdy et al. (2019).

  122. 122.

    Heydarian (2017).

  123. 123.

    Francis (2019).

  124. 124.

    Kaplan (2011b).

  125. 125.

    Kurniawan (2019).

  126. 126.

    Marxists.org (2019, April 30 “Hegel’s Philosophy …”).

  127. 127.

    Diamond (2011, 517).

  128. 128.

    Wallace-Wells (2019b).

  129. 129.

    Naím (2014).

  130. 130.

    Bremmer and Roubini (2011).

  131. 131.

    Malthus (1959).

  132. 132.

    Harari (2015).

  133. 133.

    Wendt (2003).

  134. 134.

    Paraphrasing of Rosa Luxemburg’s “Junius Pamphlet” in 1916, where the communist ideologue argued, “Bourgeois society stands at the crossroads, either transition to Socialism or regression into Barbarism.”

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heydarian, R.J. (2020). The Revenge of Malthus: Pax Indo-Pacifica and Rhizomatic Order. In: The Indo-Pacific: Trump, China, and the New Struggle for Global Mastery. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9799-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics