Abstract
This chapter looks at the issues in modeling the effect of quality variations in manufacturing. It models the effects of assembly errors and component nonconformance. This chapter constructs the month of production—month in service (MOP-MIS) diagram to characterize the claims rate as a function of MOP and MIS. It also discusses on the determination of optimum maintenance interval of an object.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Sections of the chapter draw from the co-author’s (Md. Rezaul Karim) previous published work, reused here with permissions (Blischke et al. 2011).
- 2.
For certain products (e.g., automobiles, personal computers), each unit at the product level has a unique identification number. For example, in the case of automobiles, each vehicle has a unique identification number, referred to as Vehicle Identification Number (VIN).
- 3.
- 4.
A general k-fold competing risk model means the competing risk model derived based on k failure modes of the product.
- 5.
A general k-fold finite mixture distribution is a weighted average of distribution functions given by \(F(x) = \sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{k} {p_{i} F_{i} (x)}\), with \(p_{i} \ge 0\), \(\sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{k} {p_{i} } = 1\) and \(F_{i} (x) \ge 0\), \(i = 1,2, \ldots ,k\) distribution functions associated with the k subpopulation are called the components of the mixture.
- 6.
- 7.
In some cases, it can be a shift, if a company operates more than one shift per day.
- 8.
- 9.
References
Ahmadi A (2010) Aircraft scheduled maintenance programme development: decision support methodologies and tools. Doctoral thesis, LuleĂĄ University of Technology, LuleĂĄ, Sweden
Benbow DW, Broome HW (2008) The certified reliability engineer handbook. American Society for Quality, Quality Press
Blischke WR, Karim MR, Murthy DNP (2011) Warranty data collection and analysis. Springer, London Limited
Blischke WR, Murthy DNP (2000) Reliability. Wiley, New York
Blischke WR, Murthy DNP (eds) (2003) Case studies in reliability and maintenance. Wiley, NY
Jiang R, Murthy DNP (2009) Impact of quality variations on product reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 94:490–496
Murthy DNP, Karim MR, Ahmadi A (2015) Data management in maintenance outsourcing. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 142:100–110
Murthy DNP, Rausand M, Osteras T (2008) Product reliability–performance and specifications. Springer, London
Pham H, Wang H (1996) Imperfect maintenance. Eur J Oper Res 94(3):425–438
Ruhi S, Karim MR (2016) Selecting statistical model and optimum maintenance policy: a case study of hydraulic pump. SpringerPlus 5:969
Sultana N, Karim MR (2015) Optimal replacement age and maintenance cost: a case study. Am J Theor Appl Stat 4(2):53–57
SS-EN 13306 (2010) Maintenance terminology. SIS Förlag, Stockholm
Karim MR, Suzuki K (2004) Analysis of field failure warranty data with sales lag. Pakistan J Statist 20:93–102
Karim MR (2008) Modelling sales lag and reliability of an automobile component from warranty database. Int J Reliab Saf 2:234–247
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karim, M.R., Islam, M.A. (2019). Quality Variation in Manufacturing and Maintenance Decision. In: Reliability and Survival Analysis. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9776-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9776-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9775-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9776-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)