Abstract
It is suggested that social entrepreneurship has the ability to combine social interests with the business practices to bring positive changes in the society. SRREOSHI, a women-led organisation was set up in the year 2005. In this paper, we engage with the idea of whether tools of ethnography can be used as tools to develop an internal critique where everydayness of freedom is recognised as a process of empowerment. The idea of value creation is central to a social enterprise. In SRREOSHI’s work, the focus of research is on generating knowledge aimed towards finding solutions to specific developmental problems. The idea of research is on identifying the problems, identifying the target population and comparing situations to assess the implementation. The research happens within the broader rubric of women’s empowerment. Ethnography as a research method which attempts to discover cultures and experiences of people involved in a programme can offer important tools of research that a social enterprise can use. However, we suggest that social value creation through a social enterprise involves attempts to collectivise and more attention needs to be paid in nurturing the collective. We feel that tools of ethnography can offer us important avenues of a stronger collective aimed at creating values for sustainable women’s empowerment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Babui Grass is a type of grass which is common in Bankura, Asansol and in Durgapur.
- 2.
Khejur is a local name of Date Palm in West Bengal.
- 3.
The seven key concepts of the ECC are “(1) appraisiveness, (2) internal complexity, (3) various describability, (4) openness, (5) aggressive and defensive uses, (6) original exemplar and (7) progressive competition” (Choi and Majumdar 2014, p. 364).
- 4.
Understanding the lived experiences of the different strategists in different settings. It is an underutilized method.
- 5.
A means to understand the detailed analysis of strategies of practices.
- 6.
It helps us to understand the virtual aspects of the organizational strategy work.
- 7.
It helps us to do the comparative analysis of different strategic practices and processes.
References
Appadurai, A. (2006). The right to research. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(2), 167–177.
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.
Baiocchi, G., & Connor, B. T. (2008). The ethnos in the polis: Political ethnography as a mode of inquiry. Sociology Compass, 2(1), 139–155, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buttigieg, J. A. (2011). Antonio Gramsci: Prison notebooks (Vol. III) (J. A. Buttigieg, Ed., Trans.). Columbia University Press: New York.
Chandra, Y. (2017). Social entrepreneurship as emancipatory work. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 657–673.
Cherrier, H., Goswami, P., & Ray, S. (2018). Social entrepreneurship: Creating value in the context of institutional complexity. Journal of Business Research, 86, 245–258.
Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(2014), 363–376.
Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of “social entrepreneurship”. https://entrepreneurship.duke.edu/news-item/the-meaning-of-social-entrepreneurship/ Retrieved 2.12.2018 at 10am.
Gille, Z., & Riain, S. Ó. (2002). Global ethnography. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 271–295.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed) London: Routledge.
Hoey, B. A. (2014). A simple introduction to the practice of ethnography and guide to ethnographic fieldnotes. Mimeograph, Marshall University. http://works.bepress.com/brian_hoey/12/. Retrieved 14.5.2018 at 2.20 pm.
Jaaware, A. (2016). Academic freedom and the humanities. Seminar. Retrieved on 8 Aug 2017. http://www.india-seminar.com/2016/686/686_aniket_jaaware.htm.
Pink, S., & Morgan, J. (2013). Short-term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing. Symbolic Interaction, 36(3), 351–361.
Reis, T. (1999). Unleashing the new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A scan, synthesis and scenario for action. Battle Creek, MI: W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2007). Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A strategic view. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 49–63.
Singh, A. (2016). The process of social value creation: A multiple-case study on social entrepreneurship in India. Berlin: Springer.
Tumilowicz, A., Neufeld, L. M., & Pelto, G. H. (2016). Using ethnography in implementation research to improve nutrition interventions in populations. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 11(Suppl. 3), 55–72.
Vesa, M., & Vaara, E. (2014). Strategic ethnography 2.0: Four methods for advancing strategy process and practice research. Strategic Organization, 12(4), 288–298.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bhirdikar, K., Guha, S. (2020). Practicing Ethnography in a Social Enterprise: Developing an Internal Critique. In: Majumdar, S., Reji, E. (eds) Methodological Issues in Social Entrepreneurship Knowledge and Practice. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9769-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9769-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9768-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9769-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)