Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Embodied Carbon Reduction Strategies for Buildings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICSBE 2018 (ICSBE 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 44))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Global warming has become a major environmental issue faced by the international community. Greenhouse gases (GHG) have been suspected to be the source of global warming and carbon emission has identified as the main contributor for global warming. CO2 could be released due to activities carried out by human such as burning fossil fuels, electricity consumption and transportation. Hence, the carbon footprint is the total amount of greenhouse gases produced directly or indirectly as a result of an activity. Up to 40% of all energy have been consumed by the building sector and it has contributed up to 30% of global annual GHG emissions. Therefore operational and embodied carbon were identified as two main general groups of carbon emissions related to buildings. Numerous researchers have paid their attention on operational carbon reduction and there are limited study on embodied carbon reduction. Therefore the researcher aims to identify embodied carbon reduction strategies for buildings. After a comprehensive literature review, selection of low carbon materials at the design stage of the building, reuse and recycling of carbon intensive materials, material minimization, optimum building design, local sourcing of materials, transportation minimization, efficient construction processes, policies and regulations by government, adaptive reuse of buildings and carbon labelling schemes were identified as the global embodied carbon reduction strategies for buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akbarnezhad A, Xiao J (2017) Estimation and minimization of embodied carbon of buildings: a review. Buildings 7(4):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anon (n.d.) Embodied carbon assessment. Circular Ecology. http://www.circularecology.com/embodied-carbon.html. Accessed 07 Feb 2018

  • Asdrubali F, Baldinelli G, D’Alessandro F, Scrucca F (2015) Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: review and results harmonization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 42:1113–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avetisyan HG, Miller-Hooks E, Melanta S (2012) Decision models to support greenhouse gas emissions reduction from transportation construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag 138(5):631–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basbagill J, Flager F, Lepech M, Fischer M (2013) Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts. Build Environ 60:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blue Planet Company (n.d.) Economically sustainable carbon capture. http://www.blueplanet-ltd.com/?page_id=54

  • Boardman B (2008) Carbon labelling: too complex or will it transform our buying? Significance 5(4):168–171

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley PE, Kohler N (2007) Methodology for the survival analysis of urban building stocks. Build Res Inf 35(5):529–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bribian IZ, Capilla AV, Uson AA (2011) Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Build Environ 46(5):1133–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullen PA (2007) Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings. Facilities 25(1/2):20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueren EV, Jong JD (2007) Establishing sustainability: policy successes and failures. Build Res Inf 35(5):543–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael DG, Williams EH, Kaboli AS (2012) Minimum operational emissions in earthmoving. In: Construction research congress

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau C, Hui W, Ng W, Powell G (2012) Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction in high-rise concrete office buildings using different material use options. Resour Conserv Recycl 61:22–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T, Burnett J, Chau C (2001) Analysis of embodied energy use in the residential building of Hong Kong. Energy 26(4):323–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Ng ST (2015) Integrate an embodied GHG emissions assessment model into building environmental assessment tools. Proc Eng 118:318–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou J-S, Yeh K-C (2015) Life cycle carbon dioxide emissions simulation and environmental cost analysis for building construction. J Clean Prod 101:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford RH (2011) Life cycle assessment in the built environment. Spon Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dakwale VA, Ralegaonkar RV, Mandavgane S (2011) Improving environmental performance of building through increased energy efficiency: a review. Sustain Cities Soc 1(4):211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environmental and Heritage (2004) Adaptive reuse: preserving our past, building our future, s.l.: s.n

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal S (2010) GHG emissions from urbanization and opportunities for urban carbon mitigation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2(4):277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding GK (2004) The development of a multi-criteria approach for the measurement of sustainable performance for built projects and facilities. University of Technology, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit MK, Fernandez-Solis JL, Lavy S, Culp CH (2010) Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: a literature review. Energy Build 42(8):1238–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutil Y, Rousse D, Quesada G (2011) Sustainable buildings: an ever evolving target. Sustainability 3(2):443–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foraboschi P, Mercanzin M, Trabucco D (2014) Sustainable structural design of tall buildings based on embodied energy. Energy Build 68:254–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajewski A, Siergiejuk J, Szulborski K (2013) Carbon dioxide emission while heating in selected European countries. Energy Build 65:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan VJL et al (2017) Sustainability analyses of embodied carbon and construction cost in high-rise buildings using different materials and structural forms. HKIE Trans 24(4):216–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giesekam J, Barrett JR, Taylor P (2015) Construction sector views on low carbon building materials. Build Res Inf 44(4):423–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez MJ, Navarro JG (2006) Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact. Build Environ 41(7):902–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green Construction Board (2013) Low carbon routemap for the UK built environment, s.l.: s.n

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson L, Joelsson A, Sathre R (2010) Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building. Energy Build 42(2):230–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakkinen T, Kuittinen M, Ruuska A, Jung N (2015) Reducing embodied carbon during the design process of buildings. J Build Eng 4:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammad AWA, Akbarnezhad A, Rey D, Waller ST (2016) A computational method for estimating travel frequencies in site layout planning. J Constr Eng Manag 142(5):04015102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi T, Morioka M, Yoshioka I, Yokozeki K (2014) Development of a new ecological concrete with CO2 emissions below zero. Constr Build Mater 67:338–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang W et al (2017) Carbon footprint and carbon emission reduction of urban buildings: a case in Xiamen City, China. Proc Eng 198:1007–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibn-Mohammed T et al (2013) Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings – a review of current trends. Energy Build 66:232–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbabi MS, Carrigan C, McKenna S (2012) Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology. Int J Sustain Built Environ 1(2):194–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: mitigation of climate change Working Group III contribution to the fourth Assessment Report of the International Panel on climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwaro J, Mwasha A (2013) The impact of sustainable building envelope design on building sustainability using Integrated Performance Model. Int J Sustain Built Environ 2(2):153–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junnila S, Horvath A (2003) Life-cycle environmental effects of an office building. J Infrastruct Syst 9:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang G et al (2015) Statistical analysis of embodied carbon emission for building construction. Energy Build 105:326–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok KYG, Kim J, Chong WKO, Ariaratnam ST (2016) Structuring a comprehensive carbon-emission framework for the whole lifecycle of building, operation, and construction. J Architect Eng 22(3):04016006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai JH, Yik FW, Man C (2012) Carbon audit: a literature review and an empirical study on a hotel. Facilities 30(9/10):417–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee B, Trcka M, Hensen JL (2011) Embodied energy of building materials and green building rating systems – a case study for industrial halls. Sustain Cities Soc 1(2):67–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis P et al (2009) Requirements and incentives for reducing construction vehicle emissions and comparison of nonroad diesel engine emissions data sources. J Constr Eng Manag 135:341–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie S, Berebecki P (2012) Methodology to calculate embodied carbon of materials (RICS). Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Mesa B, Pitarch A, Tomas A, Gallego T (2009) Comparison of environmental impacts of building structures with in situ cast floors and with precast concrete floors. Build Environ 44(4):699–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martos JL, Styles D, Schoenberger H, Zeschmar-Lahl B (2018) Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe. Resour Conserv Recycl 136:166–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan J, Powell J (2011) An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: a case study using a lifecycle assessment framework. Energy Build 43(1):179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadoushani ZM, Akbarnezhad A (2015) Effects of structural system on the life cycle carbon footprint of buildings. Energy Build 102:337–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadoushani ZSM, Hammad AWA, Akbarnezhad A (2017) Location optimization of tower crane and allocation of material supply points in a construction site considering operating and rental costs. J Constr Eng Manag 143(1):04016089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng W, Chau C (2015) New life of the building materials - recycle, reuse and recovery. Energy Proc 75:2884–2891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz O, Castells F, Sonnemann G (2009) Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater 23(1):28–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkaymak M et al (2017) CO2 emission during the combustion of Orhaneli lignite coal. World J Eng 14(1):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomponi F, Moncaster A (2016) Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment – what does the evidence say? J Environ Manag 181:687–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai D, Sodagar B, Fieldson R, Hu X (2011) Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction in a distribution warehouse. Energy 36(4):2271–2277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla K (2010) Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: an overview. Energy Build 42(10):1592–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid AF, Yusoff S (2015) A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:244–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy BV (2009) Sustainable materials for low carbon buildings. Int J Low-Carbon Technol 4(3):175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saghafi MD, Teshnizi ZSH (2011) Recycling value of building materials in building assessment systems. Energy Build 43(11):3181–3188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandanayake M, Zhang G, Setunge S (2016) Environmental emissions at foundation construction stage of buildings – two case studies. Build Environ 95:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano AR, Alvarez SP (2016) Life cycle assessment in building: a case study on the energy and emissions impact related to the choice of housing typologies and construction process in Spain. Sustainability 8(3):287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi X, Yang W (2013) Performance-driven architectural design and optimization technique from a perspective of architects. Autom Constr 32:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thongkamsuk P, Sudasna K, Tondee T (2017) Waste generated in high-rise buildings construction: a current situation in Thailand. Energy Proc 138:411–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thormark C (2002) A low energy building in a life cycle – its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential. Build Environ 37(4):429–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upton B, Miner R, Spinney M, Heath LS (2008) The greenhouse gas and energy impacts of using wood instead of alternatives in residential construction in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy 32(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weight D, Connaughton J, Jones C (n.d.) Information sheet for construction clients and designers: cutting embodied carbon in construction projects. http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/FINAL%20PRO095-009%20Embodied%20Carbon%20Annex.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2018

  • Wheating NC (2017) Embodied carbon: a framework for prioritizing and reducing emissions in the building industry. s.l.: s.n

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson SJ, James K, Reed R (2009) Using building adaptation to deliver sustainability in Australia. Struct Surv 27(1):46–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu P, Feng Y, Pienaar J, Xia B (2015) A review of benchmarking in carbon labelling schemes for building materials. J Clean Prod 109:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu P, Xia B, Pienaar J, Zhao X (2014) The past, present and future of carbon labelling for construction materials – a review. Build Environ 77:160–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo D, Gabbai RD (2011) Sustainable design of reinforced concrete structures through embodied energy optimization. Energy Build 43(8):2028–2033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu D, Tan H, Ruan Y (2011) A future bamboo-structure residential building prototype in China: life cycle assessment of energy use and carbon emission. Energy Build 43(10):2638–2646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Y, Wu P (2015) Economic sustainability, environmental sustainability and constructability indicators related to concrete- and steel-projects. J Clean Prod 108:748–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Authors express the gratitude to each and every individual for their encouragement, values and ideas, assistance and specially their commitment towards this research to make it a success.

Further, authors would like to acknowledge the technical assistance given by Miss L A Siriwardena, Technical Officer (Grade 1), Department of Building Economics, University of Moratuwa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Building Economics, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka

    L. M. T. Kumari, U. Kulatunga, N. Madusanka & N. Jayasena

Authors
  1. L. M. T. Kumari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. U. Kulatunga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. Madusanka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. Jayasena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Kulatunga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Kandy, Sri Lanka

    Ranjith Dissanayake

  2. Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

    Priyan Mendis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumari, L.M.T., Kulatunga, U., Madusanka, N., Jayasena, N. (2020). Embodied Carbon Reduction Strategies for Buildings. In: Dissanayake, R., Mendis, P. (eds) ICSBE 2018. ICSBE 2018. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 44. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9749-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9749-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9748-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9749-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation