Skip to main content

Organisational Culture’s Impact on Professional Opportunities and Teaching Quality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 524 Accesses

Abstract

Organisational cultures impact professional support opportunities and teaching quality. The objective of this chapter is to demonstrate that organisational and contextual factors not only influence the culture of professional support but impact the stability of the teaching workforce, with implications for strategic workforce planning. To transform challenging teaching environments, professional learning and professional development need to focus on such specific matters as out-of-field teaching, teacher and student dispositions, and school leadership styles and skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adnot, M., Dee, T., Katz, V., & Wyckoff, J. (2017). Teacher turnover, teacher quality, and student achievement in DCPS. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716663646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, S., Lam, I., & Admiraal, W. (2004). They understand what it takes: A pioneers’ view on teachers’ professional development. In C. Vrasidas & G. Glass (Eds.), Online professional development for teachers: A volume in current perspectives on applied information technologies. North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (1999). Out-of-field teaching is hard to curb. Education Week, 31 March 1999, 1–7. http://www.edweek.org/ew/1999/29out.h18.

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School leadership AITSL. (2007). Alternate pathways for teacher preparation and related matters. Melbourne, Australia: Teaching Australia. Advice to the Minister for Education, Science and Training. Australian Institute for Teaching and School leadership AITSL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badali, S., & Housego, B. (2000). Teachers’ secondment experiences. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, XLVI(4), 327–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D., & Smith, T. (1997). Trend 2. Teacher turnover and teacher quality: Refocusing the issue. Teachers College Record, 99(1), 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram, C., Fotheringham, R., & Harley, K. (2000). Curriculum studies. Scottsville, KY: School of Education, Training and Development, University of Natal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, M., & Wood, F. (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods: A vocabulary of research concepts. London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bolam, R. (1999). Educational administration, leadership and leadership: Towards a research agenda. In T. Bush, L. Bell, R. Bolam, R. Glatter, & P. Ribbons (Eds.), Educational leadership: Redefining theory, policy and practice. London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondesio, M., & De Witt, J. (2004a). Personnel leadership. In P. Van der Westhuizen (Ed.), Effective educational leadership. Cape Town, UK: ABC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondesio, M., & de Witt, J. (2004b). Areas of educational leadership. In P. Van der Westhuizen (Ed.), Effective educational leadership (12th ed.). Cape Town, UK: ABC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredeson, P. (2001). Negotiated learning: Union contracts and teacher professional development. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(26), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewton, C. (2003). Science for all: Can ‘No Child Left Behind’ make a difference? The Science Teacher, 70(3), 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadfoot, P., Osborn, M., Gilly, M., & Pailet, A. (1988). What professional responsibility means to teachers: National contexts and classroom constants. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(3), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569880090302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M. (1999). Knowledge leadership: Everyone benefits by sharing information. Public Roads, 63(3), 26–29. http://worldcat.org/oclc/1586080.

  • Burns, C. (2005). Tension between national, school and teacher development needs: A survey of teachers’ views about continuing professional development within a group of rural primary schools. Journal of In-Service Education, 31(2), 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, T. (2003). Theories of educational leadership and leadership (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership and Management, 34(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, K. (2006). Pinpointing professional development needs. District Administration, 42(1), 72 (Academic OneFile).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D., Lauscher, H., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(5), 435–455. http/sciencedirect.com/science/html.

  • Chaika, G. (2000). Out-of-field teaching: How qualified is your child’s teacher? Education World, 17(2), 1–4.  http://www.education-world.com/a_admin/admin143.shtml.

  • Cheng-Cheong, Y. (2005). Re-engineering education: Globalization, localization and individualization. London, UK: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Childs-Bowen, D. (2005). Teachers must reinvent their own future. Journal of Staff Development, 26(3), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, P. (2001). Autobiographical research and the emergence of the fictive voice. In A. Craft, J. Soler, & H. Burgess (Eds.), Teacher development: Exploring our own practice. London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Vogel, L. (2005). Introduction: Teacher and leadership pre-development: No strangers to politic. Educational Policy, 19(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croninger, R., Rice, J., Rathbun, A., & Nishio, M. (2007). Teacher qualifications and early learning: effects of certification, degree, and experience on first-grade student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 26(3), 312–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullingford, C. (2006). Mentoring in education: An international perspective. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archive, 8(1), 1–44. http://www.epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. (2000). Teachers’ response to success for all: How beliefs, experiences, and adaptations shape implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 775–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (2005). The effective primary school classroom: The essential guide for new teachers. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, T., & Cohodes, S. (2008). Out-of-field teachers and student achievement: Evidence from matched-pairs comparison. Public Finance Review, 36(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142106289330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Child Development. (2015). Recruitment and selection of teaching staff in the school procedure. Government of South Australia. https://www.decd.sa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net691/f/recruitment_teaching_schools_procedure.

  • Doll, J., Eslami, Z., & Walters, L. (2013). Understanding why students drop out of high school, according to their own reports: Are they pushed or pulled, or do They fall out? A comparative analysis of seven nationally representative studies. SAGE Open, 2013, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013503834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, A. (2005). The implications of the out-of-field phenomenon for school leadership (M Ed Full dissertation). Pretoria: UNISA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, A. (2014). Understanding the out-of-field teaching experience (Ph.D thesis). School of Education, The University of Queensland. http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:330372.

  • Du Plessis, A. (2017). Out-of-field teaching practices: What educational leaders need to know. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, A. (2018). The lived experience of out-of-field STEM teachers: A quandary for strategising quality teaching in STEM? Research in Science Education, 1–35. Online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9740-9.

  • Du Plessis, A., Hoang, N., Wang, J., Schmidt, A., Mertens, L., Cullinan, M., & Cameron, V. (2018). Invest in the future of education: Building a stable and quality beginning teacher workforce. Critical factors for reform: Evidence from the field.  Australian Catholic University. Brisbane, QLD: Australia.  

    Google Scholar 

  • Elen, J., & Lowyck, J. (2000). Instructional meta-cognitive knowledge: A qualitative study on conceptions of freshman about instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(3), 421–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, K. (2015). Teacher performance appraisal: More about performance or development? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(9), 101–116.  http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n9.6.

  • Engstrom, M., & Danielson, L. (2006). Teachers’ perception of and on-sit staff development model. The Clearing House, 79(4), 170–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetler, M. (1997). Staffing up and dropping out: Unintended consequences of high demand for teachers. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 5(16).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, L. (1999). The cultural imperative and how we consider educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1), 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. (1975). Truth and method (2nd ed.) (J. C. B. Mohr, Trans.). New York: The Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. (1976). Philosophical hermeneutics. (D. Linge, Trans. Ed. 2008). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J., & Jones, G. (2012). Understanding and managing organizational behaviour (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, R., & Mutchler. (2000). Lessons from the field: Case studies of three districts. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. http://www.sedl.org/pubs/poslicy23/5.html.

  • Goldenberg, C. (2004). Successful school change: Creating settings to improve teaching and learning. Williston, SD: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. (2004). A place called school. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G., & Hord, S. (2001). Implementing change: patterns, principles and potholes. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlyn, J. (2001). Food for thought for the recruiter: What counts in recruitment: Experience, expertise and evolution? Peoples Business. http://www.jobfood.com/mwFoodforthought/article.asp?IngID=298&subid=10.

  • Harley, K., Bertram, C., & Mattson, E. (1999). Classroom studies: Researching teacher roles in policy and practise. Pietermaritzburg, UK: University of Natal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J., & Willie, L. (2003). Connections. Teaching Music, 11(3), 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, A., & Weinstein, C. (2006). Student and teacher perspectives on classroom management. In C. Evertson & E. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues (pp. 181–219). Princeton, NJ: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. (1998a). Out-of-field teaching is widespread. http://www.debate.uvm.edu/eesample/053.html.

  • Ingersoll, R. (1998b). The problem of out-of-field teaching (Record 19). Phi Delta Kappan, 79(10), 773, 774. http://www.AcademicSearchPrimier.

  • Ingersoll, R. (1999a). The problem of under qualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26–37. http://www.aera.net/pubs/er/arts/28-02/ingsoll01.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. (1999b). Bad move: Teachers being treated like ‘semi-skilled workers’. Columns Campus News, 1999, 1–3. http://ww.uga.edu/edu/columns/990503/campnews.html.

  • Ingersoll, R. (2001a). The realities of out-of-field teaching. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 42–45.  http://www.EducationalLeadership/ingsoll.html.

  • Ingersoll, R. (2001b). Rejoinder: Misunderstanding the problem of out-of-field teaching. Educational Researcher, 2001, 21–22. http://ww.uga.edu/edu/columns/990503/campnews.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. (2002). Out-of-field teaching, educational inequality and the organisation of schools: An exploratory analysis.  http://www.ctpweb.org.

  • Ingersoll, R. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, Issue. (2005). Qualifications of Public Secondary School Biology teachers, 1999-2000. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics (ED).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerald, C., & Ingersoll, R. (2002). All talk, no action: Putting an end to out-of-field teaching. The Education Trust. http://www.edtrust.org/main/news/08_21_02_outfieldteach.asp/html.

  • Kerber, C., Brook, P., & Policy, Educational. (2001). Impact evaluation of educational development programmes. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(2), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440110090749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2012). Bottom-up/top-down leadership: Contradiction or hidden phenomenon. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(5), 725–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2012.11777264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, R. (2006). Effective teaching strategies: Lessons from research and practice (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, E. (2002). The use of self in qualitative research. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences. Toronto, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (2000). Knowing teaching: The intersection of research on teaching and qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 70(1), 86–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, M. (2000). Exploring alternative approaches in high-level entrepreneurship education: Creating micro mechanisms for endogenous regional growth. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(1), 25–47. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, J., & Moon, B. (1999). Students & pedagogy. London, UK: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leaders. London, UK: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, U. (2014). Professional norms guiding school principals’ pedagogical leadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(4), 461–476. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2014-0121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levacic, R., & Glatter, R. (2001). ‘Really good ideas’? Developing evidence-informed policy and practice in educational leadership and leadership. Educational Leadership & Administration, 29(1), 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (2001). Conceptualising the process of education reform from an international perspective. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(14), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, T., Cooksey, R., Panisson, D., Parnell, A., & Pegg, J. (2006). Science, ICT and mathematics. National Centre of Science, ICT and Mathematics Education for Rural and Regional Australia, University of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, A., Prater, D., & Busch, S. (2009). The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1), 73–84. http://doi.org/10.1080/13603120701576241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangan, P., & Patel, U. (2005). Online staff development: Using the web to enhance teacher autonomy and student learning. In P. Hartley, A. Woods, & M. Pill (Eds.), Enhancing teaching in higher education: New approaches for improving student learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. (2016). Five challenges in Australian school education. Policy Insight, Issue 5. Australian Council for Education Research, ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConney, A., & Price, A. (2009). An assessment of the phenomenon of teaching out-of-field in WA Schools. Final Report: April 2009. Perth, WA: Western Australian College of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillen-Seastorm, M., Gruber, K., Haneke, R., McGrath, D., & Cohen, B. (2004). Qualifications of the public school teacher workforce: prevalence of Out-of-Field teaching 1987–1988 to 1999–2000. Statistical analysis report. National Center for Education Statistics. U. S. Department of Education: Institute of Education Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mhangwana N’wa, T. (2004, June 9). Bad attitude sinks maths. News24.com, 1.  http://www.news24.com/news24/SouthAfrica/News/0,2-7-1442153993500.html.

  • Mutshekwane, A. (2001). Client-based in-service education and training: From South Africa with lessons. In Y. Cheng, K. Chow, & K. Tsui (Eds.), New teacher education for the future: International perspectives. Hong Kong: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. (2015). Where are the worst teacher shortages? World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/12/where-are-the-worst-teacher-shortages.

  • Norton, S. (2008). Human resources administration for educational leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, L. (2000). Finding and keeping competent teachers. Quality counts 2000: Who should teach? Education Week: Editorial Projects in Education, 19(18), 12–18. http://www.edweek.org/sreports/qc00/templates/article.cfm?slug=intro.html.

  • Owen, S., Kos, J., & McKenzie, P. (2008). Teacher workforce data and planning processes in Australia. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education and Workplace Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, S. (2002). Women in educational leadership: Present and future challenges (M.Ed Full dissertation). Pretoria, UK: University of South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plecki, M. (2000). Economic perspectives on investments in teacher quality: Lessons learned from research on productivity and human resource development. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(33), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podgursky, M. (2006). Is there a ‘qualified teacher’ shortage? Education Next, 6(2), 1–7. http://www.educationnext.org.html.

  • Ringstaff, C., & Haymore, S. (2002). Out-of-field assignments: Case studies of two beginning teachers. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 812–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosaen, C., & Florio-Ruane, S. (2008). The metaphors by which we teach: Experience, metaphor, and culture in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2003). Teacher professional standards: Controlling or developing teaching? Teachers and Teaching, 9(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600309373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutte, O. (2000). Identifisering en ontleding van stresfaktore aan ‘n tersiêre onderwysinrigting in ‘n periode van verandering (M.Ed-proefskrif). Pretoria: Universiteit van Suid-Afrika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C., Stone, B., & Dinham, S. (2001). International patterns of teacher discontent. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(28), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2015, November 12). Why is school not working for so many young people? The Conversationhttps://theconversation.com/why-is-school-not-working-for-so-many-young-people-50511.

  • Steyn, G. (2002). Perceptions of quality in an American school district and some questions it raises for South African schools. Pretoria, UK: Faculty of Education, University of South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyn, G., & Du Plessis, A. (2007). The implications of the out-of-field phenomenon for effective teaching, quality education and school leadership. Africa Education Review, 4(2), 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subban, P. (2016, February 4). Australian students are becoming increasingly disengaged at school—here’s why. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/australian-students-are-becoming-increasingly-disengaged-at-school-heres-why-51570.

  • Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2005). Supervision that improves teaching: strategies and techniques (2nd ed.). London, UK: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, R. (2007). Classroom leadership: Sound theory and effective practice. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A., & Wong, A. (2006). Issues in the development of school—university partnership. In J. Lee Chi-kin & M. Williams (Eds.), School improvement: International perspectives. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueckermann, H. (2007). ‘Voer onderwysers in om wiskunde te gee’. Loopbane 24. Rapport. 7 Oktober 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Westhuizen, P. (2004). Effective educational leadership (12th ed.). Cape Town: ABC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (2016). The tone of teaching: The language of pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. (2001a). ‘Really good ideas’? Developing evidence-informed policy and practice in educational leadership and leadership: A ‘rejoinder’ to Rosalind Levacic and Ron Glatter. Educational Leadership and Administration, 29(1), 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. (2001b). Sharing leadership of schools through teamwork: A justifiable risk? Educational Leadership & Administration, 29(2), 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, H., Richardson, P., & Devos, C. (2012). (How) Does gender matter in the choice of a STEM teaching career and later teaching behaviours? International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 5(3), 188–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, A., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, P. (2015). The teacher workforce in Australia: Supply, demand and data issues. Policy Insights, Issue 2. Australian Council for Education Research, ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, P. (2016). Out-of-field teaching in Australian secondary schools. Policy Insights, Issue 6. Australian Council for Educational Research, ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, Sage Social Science Collection, 7(2), 225–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zbar, V., Marshall, G., & Power, P. (2007). Better school, better teachers, better results: A handbook for improved performance leadership in your school. Camberwell, UK: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Elizabeth Du Plessis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Du Plessis, A. (2019). Organisational Culture’s Impact on Professional Opportunities and Teaching Quality. In: Professional Support Beyond Initial Teacher Education. Teacher Education, Learning Innovation and Accountability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9722-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9722-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9721-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9722-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics