Skip to main content

Allocation of Order Amongst Available Suppliers Using Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Asset Analytics ((ASAN))

Abstract

In a supply chain, procurement of items is done on the basis of individual performance, whereas the performance of supply chain can be improved by using scientific techniques. In this chapter, we discuss the manufacturer’s problem of procuring several items from the available suppliers; where, supplies from each supplier are constrained. The manufacturer needs to determine which item is to be procured from which supplier and in what quantity. The allocation of order amongst suppliers is done on the basis of multiple criteria such as unit price, quality, supply capacity, delivery time, and unit transportation cost. To demonstrate the scenario, we formulate the mathematical model, which leads to a multi-objective optimization problem. The optimization is done using multi-objective genetic algorithm, which gives a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, then we utilize 3D-RadVis technique to get the best solution. To validate the model, numerical example is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amin SH, Zhang G (2012) An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: Multi-objective approach. Expert Syst Appl 39(8):6782–6791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basnet C, Weintraub A (2009) A genetic algorithm for a bicriteria supplier selection problem. Int Trans Oper Res 16(2):173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao Y, Luo X, Kwong C, Tang J (2014) Supplier pre-selection for platform-based products: a multi-objective approach. Int J Prod Res 52(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb K (2012) Optimization for engineering design: Algorithms and examples. PHI Learning Pvt Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  5. Golberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addion Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  6. He Z, Yen GG (2016) Visualization and performance metric in many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 20(3):386–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibrahim A, Rahnamayan S, Martin MV, Deb K (2016) 3d-radvis: Visualization of pareto front in many-objective optimization. In: 2016 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC). IEEE, pp 736–745

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibrahim A, Rahnamayan S, Martin MV, Deb K (2018) 3d-radvis antenna: visualization and performance measure for many-objective optimization. Swarm Evol Comput 39:157–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Izadikhah M, Saen RF, Ahmadi K (2017) How to assess sustainability of suppliers in the presence of dual-role factor and volume discounts? A data envelopment analysis approach. Asia-Pac J Oper Res 34(03):1740016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Izadikhah M, Saen RF, Roostaee R (2018) How to assess sustainability of suppliers in the presence of volume discount and negative data in data envelopment analysis? Ann Oper Res 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li M, Zhen L, Yao X (2017) How to read many-objective solution sets in parallel coordinates [educational forum]. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 12(4):88–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Michalewicz Z (1996) Evolution strategies and other methods. In: Genetic Algorithms+ Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Springer, pp 159–177

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murata T, Ishibuchi H, Tanaka H (1996) Multi-objective genetic algorithm and its applications to flowshop scheduling. Comput Ind Eng 30(4):957–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Obayashi, S. and Sasaki, D. (2003). Visualization and data mining of pareto solutions using self-organizing map. In International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, pages 796–809. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  16. Parks GT, Miller I (1998) Selective breeding in a multiobjective genetic algorithm. In: International conference on parallel problem solving from nature. Springer, pp 250–259

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pryke A, Mostaghim S, Nazemi (2007) Heatmap visualization of population based multi objective algorithms. In: International conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization. Springer, pp 361–375

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sakawa M (2012) Genetic algorithms and fuzzy multiobjective optimization, vol 14. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schaffer JD (1984) Some experiments in machine learning using vector evaluated genetic algorithms (artificial intelligence, optimization, adaptation, pattern recognition)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seifbarghy M, Esfandiari N (2013) Modeling and solving a multi-objective supplier quota allocation problem considering transaction costs. J Intell Manuf 24(1):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaw K, Shankar R, Yadav SS, Thakur LS (2012) Supplier selection using fuzzy ahp and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Syst Appl 39(9):8182–8192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Srinivasan N, Deb K (1994) Multi-objective function optimisation using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Evol Comput 2(3):221–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Timmerman E (1986) An approach to vendor performance evaluation. J Purch Mater Manag 22(4):2–8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tušar T, Filipič B (2015) Visualization of pareto front approximations in evolutionary multiobjective optimization: a critical review and the prosection method. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 19(2):225–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. von Lücken C, Brizuela C, Barán B (2019) An overview on evolutionary algorithms for many-objective optimization problems. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: data mining and knowledge discovery 9(1):e1267

    Google Scholar 

  26. Weber CA, Current J, Desai A (2000) An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ. Supply Chain Manag Int J 5(2):90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weber CA, Current JR (1993) A multiobjective approach to vendor selection. Eur J Oper Res 68(2):173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azharuddin Shaikh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shaikh, A., Mishra, P., Talati, I. (2020). Allocation of Order Amongst Available Suppliers Using Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm. In: Shah, N., Mittal, M. (eds) Optimization and Inventory Management. Asset Analytics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9698-4_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics