Skip to main content

Cultural methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 459 Accesses

Abstract

Precision farming systems delivered a new, more efficient and accurate cultural method of farming. Whilst the economic gains of precision farming were almost impossible for the local farmers interviewed to quantify, many farmers were satisfied with the technical gains precision farming systems enabled following adoption. Some of the realised benefits were new ways of seeing and knowing their crops, increased accuracy in crop work and accounting methods, and the practical and symbolic rewards of tidier farm landscapes. Cultural gains not only came at the cost of the technologies but to attain new organisational capacitates farmers had to abdicate certain degrees of control over information and means of production, which were appropriated by networks of off-farm firms. It concludes by discussing the appropriation of control over aspects of conventional farm systems by transnational firms in relation to traditional family farming cultures of the Somerset area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Burton, R. J. F. (2004). Seeing Through the ‘Good Farmer’s’ Eyes: Towards Developing an Understanding of the Social Symbolic Value of ‘Productivist’ Behaviour. Sociologia Ruralis, 44, 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00270.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R. J. F. (2012). Understanding Farmers’ Aesthetic Preference for Tidy Agricultural Landscapes: A Bourdieusian Perspective. Landscape Research, 37, 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, K. (2014). Capitalism, Citizenship, and the Arts of Thinking: A Marxist-Arisotelian Linguistic Account. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra and The Rt Hon Elizabeth Truss MP. (2015). Environment Secretary Unveils Vision for Open Data to Transform Food and Farming. UK Gov. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/environment-secretary-unveils-vision-for-open-data-to-transform-food-and-farming.

  • Dickens, P. (1996). Reconstructing Nature. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, P. (2004). Society & Nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, P. (2009). Congnitive Capitalism and Species-Being. In S. Moog & R. Stones (Eds.), Nature, Social Relations and Human Needs (pp. 107–127). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, P., & Ormrod, J. S. (2007). Cosmic Society. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliamentary Research Service. (2016). Precision Agriculture and the Future of Farming in Europe. In L. V. Woensel (Ed.), Science and Technology Options Assessment. Brussels: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D., Sorj, B., & Wilkinson, J. (1987). From Farming to Biotechnology: A Theory of Agro-Industrial Development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971). Towards a Rational Society. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1992). The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. (2004). New Technologies and Environmental Innovation. Cheltenham: Edware Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (2007 [1867]). Das Kapital. Iowa City: Synergy International of the Americas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1974). The German Ideology. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. P. J. (1996). Ecological Modernisation and Institutional Reflexivity: Environmental Reform in the Late Modern Age. Environmental Politics, 5, 302–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. P. J. (2008). Environmental Reform in the Information Age: The Contours of Informational Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulier Boutang, Y. (2011). Cognitive Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. (1994). Rationality & Nature: A Sociological Inquiry into a Changing Relationship. Oxford: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newby, H. (1997). The Deferential Worker: A Study of Farm Workers in East Anglia. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. (2016). Skilled Workforces and Precision Agriculture. In R. Schrijver (Ed.), Technical Horizon Scan: Precision Agriculture and the Future of Farming in Europe. Brussels: STOA, EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2011). The McDonaldization of Society 6. Newbury Park, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, L.-A. (2013). Can Organic Farmers Be ‘Good Farmers’? Adding the ‘Taste of Necessity’ to the Conventionalization Debate. Agriculture and Human Values, 30, 429–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabo, J. (2013). Autonomy in Agriculture. The National Farmers Union Mutual Charitable Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Farm Practices Survey. (2009). 2. Precision Farming Technology (DEFRA, Ed.). http://archive.defra.gov.uk/evidence/statistics/foodfarm/enviro/farmpractice/.

  • The Farm Practices Survey. (2012). 2.1: Proportion of Farms Using Precision Farming Techniques (DEFRA, Ed.). http://archive.defra.gov.uk/evidence/statistics/foodfarm/enviro/farmpractice/: DEFRA.

  • Toscano, A. (2007). From Pin Factories to Gold Farmers: Editorial Introduction to a Research Stream on Cognitive Capitalism, Immaterial Labour, and the General Intellect. Historical Materialism, 15, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vercellone, C. (2007). From Formal Subsumption to General Intellect: Elements for a Marxist Reading of the Thesis of Cognitive Capitalism. Historical Materialism-Research in Critical Marxist Theory, 15, 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2003). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, K. (2015). We Can’t Let John Deere Destroy the Very Idea of Ownership. Wired Business. http://www.wired.com/2015/04/dmca-ownership-john-deere/: Wired.

  • Wolf, S., & Wood, S. (1997). Precision Farming: Environmental Legitimation, Commodification of Information, and Industrial Coordination. Rural Sociology, 62, 180–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukerfeld, M. (2017). Knowledge in the Age of Digital Capitalism: An Introduction to Cognitive Materialism. London: University of Westminster Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Addicott, J.E. (2020). Cultural methods. In: The Precision Farming Revolution. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9686-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9686-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9685-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9686-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics