Looking to the Skies: Post-war Radar Stories

  • Sophia Davis


Building on the theme of militarisation, this chapter adds a tighter focus on some of the military-scientific research bases in Suffolk and their coastal skyward gaze. Three research sites on the Suffolk coast were pivotal in the development of radar, hailed after the Second World War as one of the new scientific advances that helped make “Britain an island again” and win that war. In the stories told about radar and its protection of the island nation, there is an interlacing of the themes of islands, threat and militarism. This new wartime technology was harnessed to create a string of watching stations along the British coast, where trained observers watched for airborne incomers. This chapter investigates ways of seeing at a more public level, examining how stories or the mythology of radar circulated in the years following the war.


  1. Agar, Jon, and Ted Hughes. 2002. “Open Systems in a Closed World: Ground and Airborne Radar in the UK, 1945–1990.” In Cold War, Hot Science: Applied Research in Britain’s Defence Laboratories, edited by Robert Bud and P. Gummett, 219–250. London: NMSI Trading.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous. 1943. “What Are the Facts About Radar?” Popular Science 143 (2). Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1945. “Radar Sees the Unseen.” Popular Mechanics 84 (4).Google Scholar
  4. ———. Suffolk Oral History Archive, OHT 149, Suffolk Public Record Office, Ipswich.Google Scholar
  5. Baldacchino, Godfrey. 2007. “Islands as Novelty Sites.” The Geographical Review 97 (2): 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lord Beaverbrook, Max Aitken. 1941. “‘Radio Location’: Lord Beaverbrook’s Call for Helpers.” The Times, 18 June.Google Scholar
  7. Bowen, E. G. 1987. Radar Days. Bristol: J. W. Arrowsmith.Google Scholar
  8. Bowyer, Michael. 1986. Air Raid! The Enemy Offensive Against East Anglia, 1939–1945. London: Patrick Stephens.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, Louis. 1999. A Radar History of World War II: Technical and Military Imperatives. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  10. Browne, R. Douglas. 1981. East Anglia 1940. Lavenham, Suffolk: Terence Dalton.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1986. East Anglia 1941. Lavenham, Suffolk: Terence Dalton.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1988. East Anglia 1942. Lavenham, Suffolk: Terence Dalton.Google Scholar
  13. Bushby, John. 1973. Air Defence of Great Britain. Shepperton, Surrey: Ian Allan.Google Scholar
  14. Caedal, Martin. 1980. “Popular Fiction and the Next War, 1918–39.” In Class, Culture and Social Change: A New View of the 1930s, edited by Frank Gloversmith. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  15. Calder, Angus. 1969. The People’s War: Britain 1939–1945. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  16. Callon, Michael. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? edited by John Law, 196–223. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carne, Daphne. 1960. The Eyes of the Few. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Case, Judd A. 2010. “Geometry of Empire: Radar as Logistical Medium.” PhD diss., University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  19. Charlton, L. E. O. 1938. The Air Defence of Britain. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Clark, Gregory C. 1997. “Deflating British Radar Myths of World War II.” A Research Paper Presented to the Research Department, Air Command and Staff College.Google Scholar
  21. Clark, Ronald W. 1962. The Rise of the Boffins. London: Phoenix House.Google Scholar
  22. Clarke, David. 1999. “Scareships over Britain: The Airship Wave of 1909.” Fortean Studies 6: 39–63.Google Scholar
  23. Cocroft, Wayne, and Magnus Alexander. 2009. “Atomic Weapons Research Establishment, Orford Ness, Suffolk: Cold War Research and Development Site Survey Report.” English Heritage, Research Department Report Series No. 10. Google Scholar
  24. Collier, Basil. 1957. Leader of the Few: The Authorised Biography of Air Chief Marshal, the Lord Dowding of Bentley Priory. London: Jarrolds.Google Scholar
  25. Crowther, James G., and Richard Whiddington. 1947. Science at War. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  26. Cunningham, Valerie. 1988. British Writers of the Thirties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Deer, Patrick. 2009. Culture in Camouflage: War, Empire and Modern British Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Edgerton, David. 1991. England and the Aeroplane: An Essay on a Militant and Technological Nation. Manchester: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2006. Warfare State: Britain 1920–1970. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Fleming, Peter. 1957. Invasion 1940: An Account of the German Preparations and the British Counter-measures. London: R. Hart Davis.Google Scholar
  31. Fortun, Michael, and Silvan S. Schweber. 2016. Scientists and the Legacy of World War II: The Case of Operations Research (OR). Social Studies of Science 23 (4): 595–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gough, Jack. 1993. Watching the Skies: A History of Ground Radar for the Air Defence of the United Kingdom by the Royal Air Force from 1946 to 1975. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  33. Greenhough, Beth. 2006. “Tales of an Island-Laboratory: Defining the Field in Geography and Field Sciences.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geography 31: 224–237.Google Scholar
  34. Gruffudd, Pyrs. 1991. “Reach for the Sky: The Air and English Cultural Nationalism.” Landscape Research 16: 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guerlac, Henry E. 1987. Radar in World War II, Volume I. Tomash Publishers/American Institute of Physics. Volume 8 of The History of Modern Physics 1800–1950. First published 1946.Google Scholar
  36. Hanbury Brown, Robert. 1991. Boffin: A Personal Story of the Early Days of Radar, Radio Astronomy and Quantum Optics. Bristol: Adam Hilger.Google Scholar
  37. Hartcup, Guy. 2000. The Effect of Science on the Second World War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Heazell, Patrick. 2010. Most Secret: The Hidden History of Orford Ness. Stroud: The History Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hughes, Jeff. 2003. The Manhattan Project: Big Science and the Atom Bomb. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kern, Stephen. 1983. The Culture of Time and Space, 1880–1918. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  41. Kendal, Brian. 2003. “An Overview of the Development and Introduction of Ground Radar.” The Journal of Navigation 56: 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kevles, Daniel. 1978. The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kinsey, Gordon. 1975. Martlesham Heath. Lavenham, Suffolk: Terrance Dalton.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 1981. Orfordness: Secret Site. Lavenham, Suffolk: Terrance Dalton.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 1983. Bawdsey: Birth of the Beam. Lavenham, Suffolk: Terrance Dalton.Google Scholar
  46. Kirby, Maurice. 2003. Operations Research in War and Peace: The British Experience from the 1930s to 1970. London: Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kirby, Maurice, and Rebecca Capey. 1997. “The Air Defence of Great Britain, 1920–1940: An Operational Research Perspective.” The Journal of the Operational Research Society 48: 558–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kirsch, Scott. 1997. “Watching the Bombs Go Off: Photography, Nuclear Landscapes and Spectator Democracy.” Antipode 29 (3): 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Knorr-Cetina, Karin, and Klaus Amann. 1990. “Image Dissection in Natural Scientific Inquiry.” Science, Technology and Human Values 15: 256–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kohler, Robert. 2002. Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Koistinen, Paul. 1980. The Military-Industrial Complex: A Historical Perspective. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  52. Kyba, Patrick. 1983. Covenants Without the Sword: Public Opinion and British Defence Policy 1931–1935. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Lant, Antonia. 1991. Blackout: Reinventing Women for Wartime British Cinema. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Latham, Colin, and Anne Stobbs. 1999. Pioneers of Radar. Stroud: Sutton Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Latour, Bruno. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. ———. 1998. “Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World.” In Science Studies Reader, edited by Mario Biagioli. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Leed, Eric 1979. No Man’s Land: Combat and Identity in World War I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Leslie, Stuart. 1993. The Cold War and American Science: The Military-Industrial-Academic Complex at MIT and Stanford. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Livingstone, David. 2003. Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  60. Lovell, Bruno. 1991. Echoes of War: The Story of H2S Radar. Bristol: Adam Hilger.Google Scholar
  61. Lovell, Bruno, and D. G. Hurst. 1988. “Wilfred Bennett Lewis: 24 June 1908–10 January 1987.” Biographical Memoirs of Members of the Royal Society 34: 453–509.Google Scholar
  62. Lowenthal, David. 2007. “Islands, Lovers and Others.” The Geographical Review 97: 202–229.Google Scholar
  63. Lynch, Michael. 1985. “Discipline and the Material Form of Images: An Analysis of Scientific Visibility.” Social Studies of Science 15: 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lynch, Michael, and Samuel Edgerton Jr. 1988. “Aesthetics and Digital Image Processing: Representational Craft in Contemporary Astronomy.” In Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, edited by Gordon Fyfe and John Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. MacDonald, Fraser. 2006. “Geopolitics and ‘the Vision Thing’: Regarding Britain and America’s First Nuclear Missile.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geography 31: 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. MacKenzie, David. 1990. Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  67. Madge, Charles, and Tom Harrison. 1940. War Begins at Home. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  68. McCloskey, Joseph. 1987. “The Beginnings of Operations Research, 1934–1941.” Operations Research 35: 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McKinney, John B. 2006. “Radar Becomes Operational (1939–1941): Phase V of the Invention of Radar.” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems 21: 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Omissi, David E. 1992. “Hendon Air Pageant, 1920–37.” In Popular Imperialism and the Military, 1850–1950, edited by John MacKenzie. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Palmer, Arnold, ed. 1947. Recording Britain, Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
  72. Patterson, Ian. 2007. Guernica and Total War. London: Profile.Google Scholar
  73. Peck, J. H. 1945. “Radar… Magic Eye That Sees the Invisible.” Popular Science 147 (3). Google Scholar
  74. Readman, Paul. 2014. “‘The Cliffs Are Not Cliffs’: The Cliffs of Dover and National Identities in Britain, c. 1750–c. 1950.” History 99 (335): 241–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Reeve, N. H. 1989. The Novels of Rex Warner: An Introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  76. Reynolds, David. 2000. Rich Relations: The American Occupation of Britain 1942–1945. London: Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
  77. Roland, Alex. 1985. “Science and War.” Osiris 1 (1): 247–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rowe, A. P. 1948. One Story of Radar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Rudwick, Martin. 1976. “The Emergence of a Visual Language for Geological Science 1760–1840.” History of Science 14: 149–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schaffer, Simon. 1998. “Leviathan of Parsonstown: Literary Technology and Scientific Representation.” In Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and the Materiality of Communication, edited by Tim Lenoir. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Searle, Rebecca. 2009. “The War Artists’ Advisory Committee, Aviation and the Nation During the Second World War.” FORUM: University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture and the Arts 8. Google Scholar
  82. Snow, C. P. 1962. Science and Government—The Godkin Lectures at Harvard University. New York: The New American Library.Google Scholar
  83. The Times. “Detection by Ether Waves.” 18 June 1941: 4.Google Scholar
  84. United States Joint Board on Scientific Information Policy (JBSIP). 1945. Radar: A Report on Science at War. Washington: Office of War Information. Reprinted immediately in the UK.Google Scholar
  85. Virilio, Paul. 1989. War and Cinema: The Logistics of Perception. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  86. ———. 2002. Desert Screen: War at the Speed of Light. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  87. ———. 1953. “The Natural History of the Boffin.” Proceedings of the Royal Engineers 41: 1699.Google Scholar
  88. ———. 1957. Three Steps to Victory: A Personal Account by Radar’s Greatest Pioneer. London: Odhams Press.Google Scholar
  89. Weight, Angela. 1987. “Night for Day: The Wartime Nocturne in British Painting, 1940–45.” In Paradise Lost: The Neo-Romantic Imagination in Britain 1935–55, edited by David Mellor, 125–128. London: Barbican Art Gallery.Google Scholar
  90. Weintroub, S. 1948. “Britain’s Scientific War Effort.” Nature 4102: 907–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wilkins, Arnold F. 1981. “‘A Glimmer’ and ‘The Islanders.’” In Orfordness: Secret Site, edited by Gordon Kinsey. Lavenham, Suffolk: Terrance Dalton.Google Scholar
  92. ———. 1983. “Chain Home.” In Bawdsey: Birth of the Beam, edited by Gordon Kinsey. Lavenham, Suffolk: Terrance Dalton.Google Scholar
  93. Wills, Henry. 1985. Pillboxes: A Study of UK Defences, 1940. London: Leo Cooper.Google Scholar
  94. Wood, Derek. 1976. Attack Warning Red: History of the Royal Observer Corps. London: Macdonald.Google Scholar
  95. Zimmerman, David. 2001. Britain’s Shield: Radar and the Defeat of the Luftwaffe. Stroud: Sutton Publishing.Google Scholar
  96. Zuckerman, Solly. 1966. Scientists and War: The Impact of Science on Military and Civil Affairs. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  97. ———. 1975. “Scientific Advice During and Since World War II.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A 342: 465–480.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophia Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations