Skip to main content

Love or Hate—Preserve or Demolish: What to Do with Industrial Heritage?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transformation of Sydney’s Industrial Historic Waterfront
  • 375 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 2 presents the heritage industry as a link to a sense of the decline of modern society, aligning the growing interest towards industrial heritage during the period of the rise of neoliberalism. Accordingly, it emphasises on the shifts in attitude towards the historic environment and community reactions against the process of urban transformation as well as on the development of heritage policies in Australia. However, the chapter also draws attention to the convergence of industrial heritage sites into mixed-use developments and festival marketplaces, changing the characteristics of neighbourhoods, and the conservation of historic buildings that are carried out for tourist consumption. It highlights the reasons why former industrial and warehouse structures have been valorised and have become commercial products of real estate markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ICOMOS is an international and non-governmental organisation. Its objectives are to protect sites and historical monuments, to support and to direct each kind of research about conservation and assessment techniques, theories and methods (http://www.icomos.org).

  2. 2.

    This new mode of capital accumulation has been discussed in Chap. 4, with an argument involving shifting from industry and a manufacturing-based economy to a service-based economy.

  3. 3.

    “The term ‘cultural property’ shall cover, irrespective of origin or ownership:

    (a) movable or immovable property of great importance to the cultural heritage of every people, such as monuments of architecture, art or history, whether religious or secular; archaeological sites; groups of buildings which, as a whole, are of historical or artistic interest; works of art; manuscripts, books and other objects of artistic, historical or archaeological interest; as well as scientific collections and important collections of books or archives or of reproductions of the property defined above;

    (b) buildings whose main and effective purpose is to preserve or exhibit the movable cultural property defined in sub-paragraph (a) such as museums, large libraries and depositories of archives, and refuges intended to shelter, in the event of armed conflict (Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property 1954).

  4. 4.

    Kelly’s Bush is a small remnant area of bushland in Hunters Hill, saved from the development scheme (A.V. Jennings Company) in 1971 (Davison 1991, p. 21).

  5. 5.

    For the purposes of the Australian Heritage Commission Act of 1975, “the national estate consists of places, being components of the natural or the cultural environment of Australia, that have aesthetic, historic, scientific or social significance or other special value for future generations as well as for the present community” (Flood 1993).

  6. 6.

    Due to its hegemonic impacts on political, economic and social practices, David Harvey has referred to neoliberalism as creative destruction (Harvey 2007).

  7. 7.

    The state and Sydney City Council degraded heritage buildings in the CBD and on the waterfront by retaining only their facades during the building boom (Mosler 2011).

References

  • Alfrey, J & Putnam, T 2003, The industrial heritage: managing resources and uses, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, GJ 2009, ‘Do tourists destroy the heritage they have come to experience?’, Tourism Recreation Research, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balint, E, Howells, T & Smyth, V 1982, Warehouses and woolstores of Victorian Sydney, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blockley, M 1999, ‘Preservation, restoration and presentation of the industrial heritage: a case study of the Ironbridge Gorge’, in D Baker (ed.), Managing historic sites and buildings: reconciling presentation and preservation, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrup, T, Partners for Livable Communities & McKnight Foundation 2006, The creative community builder’s handbook: how to transform communities using local assets, art, and culture, Fieldstone Alliance, Saint Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, D & Creighton, O 2006, ‘Contested identities: the dissonant heritage of European town walls and walled towns’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 234–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, RT 1981, ‘Mergers in British trade unions 1949–79’, Industrial Relations Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgmann, M & Burgmann, V 1998, Green Bans, red union: environmental activism and the New South Wales Builders Labourers’ Federation, UNSW Press, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D 2008, ‘Heritage as social action’, in GJ Fairclough (ed.), The heritage reader, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D, Brayshaw, H, Ireland, T & New South Wales National Parks Wildlife Service Cultural Heritage Services Division 2001, Social significance: a discussion paper, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Hurstville, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvino, I 1978, Invisible cities, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, G & Jahrig, S 1998, ‘Heritage tourism: Montana’s hottest travel trend’, Montana Business Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • City Plan Heritage 2014, Report on City of Sydney industrial and warehouse buildings heritage study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E 2005, ‘The order and simplicity of gentrification: a political challenge’ in R Atkinson & G Bridge (eds.), Gentrification in a global context, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossons, N 1975, The BP book of industrial archaeology, David & Charles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossons, N 2000, Power of place: the future of the historic environment, Power of Place Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossons, N 2012, ‘Why preserve the industrial heritage?’, in J Douet (ed.), Industrial heritage re-tooled: the TICCIH guide to industrial heritage conservation, Carnegie Publishing, Lancaster, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe 1975, The European Charter of the Architectural Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe 1985, Convention for the Protection of the Architectural Heritage of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe 2005, Framework Faro Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, G 1991, ‘The meanings of heritage’, in G Davison & C McConville (eds.), A heritage handbook, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G 2006, ‘The idea of community’, in G Day, Community and everyday life, Routledge, London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G 2003, Community (key ideas), Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicks, B 2000, Heritage, place and community, University of Wales Press, Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edensor, T 2005, Industrial ruins: space, aesthetics and materiality, Berg Publishers, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, G 2011, ‘New heritage frontiers’, in Council of Europe (ed.), Heritage and beyond, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, J 1993, ‘Cultural resource management in Australia: the last three decades’, in M Spriggs, DE Yen et al. (eds.), A community of culture: The people and prehistory of the Pacific, vol. 21, pp. 259–265, Australian National University, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freestone, R 1993, ‘Heritage, urban planning, and the postmodern city’, The Australian Geographer, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freestone, R 1995, ‘From icons to institutions: heritage conservation in Sydney’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, CR & Freestone, R 2006 ‘The cultural dimension of urban planning strategies: an historical perspective’, in FJ Monclús & MG i Bassols (eds.), Culture, urbanism and planning, Ashgate, Burlington, VT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R & Raber, M 2000, Industrial heritage in northwest Connecticut: a guide to history and archaeology, Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S 1994, ‘Coke ovens at Vobster Breach Colliery’, Industrial Archaeology Review, vol. 17, no. 1, 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, L 2011, ‘Industrial heritage more at risk than castles’, The Telegraph, 19 October, viewed 18 September 2015, <https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/earthnews/8834214/Industrial-heritage-more-at-risk-than-castles.html>.

  • Harrison, R 2013, Heritage: critical approaches, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R & Schofield, J 2010, After modernity: archaeological approaches to the contemporary past, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D 1990, The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the conditions of cultural change, Blackwell, Malden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D 2007, ‘Neoliberalism as creative destruction’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 610, pp. 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, DC 2001, ‘Heritage pasts and heritage presents: temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P & Ashworth, GJ 1999, European heritage, planning and management, Intellect Books, Exeter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, B 2000, ‘Global and local change on the port-city waterfront’, Geographical Review, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 395–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS 1987, Charter for the Conservation of Historic Towns and Urban Areas, The Washington Charter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, T 2002, ‘Giving value to the Australian historic past: historical archaeology, heritage and nationalism’, Australasian Historical Archaeology, vol. 20, pp. 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, W 2006, ‘Managing urban heritage resources within a cultural tourism context’, in Community destination management in developing economies, Haworth Hospitality Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokilehto, J 2005, ‘Definition of cultural heritage: references to documents in history’, ICCROM Working Group ‘Heritage and Society’, pp. 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocka, J 1999, Industrial culture and bourgeois society: business, labour, and bureaucracy in modern Germany, Berghahn Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D 2005, For space, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosler, S 2011, Heritage politics in Adelaide, University of Adelaide Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Department of Environment and Planning 1983, Darling Harbour Development Project: study of environmental issues.

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Government Architect’s Office & NSW Public Works for Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority 2012, Metcalfe Bond stores: conservation management plan: 68–76 George Street, The Rocks 1912, 78–84 George Street, The Rocks 1916, Government Architect’s Office, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcliffe, GB 1981, ‘Industrial change in old port areas, the case of the Port of Toronto’, Cahiers de Géographie du Québec, vol. 25, no. 65, pp. 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M & Neaverson, P 1998, Industrial archaeology: principles and practice, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendlebury, J Townshend, T & Gilroy, R 2004, ‘The conservation of English cultural built heritage: a force for social inclusion?’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, DF & Silverman, H 2009, ‘From tangible to intangible heritage’, in DF Ruggles & H Silverman (eds.), Intangible heritage embodied, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, N 2010, ‘The globalization of heritage through tourism: balancing standardization and differentiation’, in S Labadi & C Long (eds.), Heritage and globalisation, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severcan, YC & Barlas, A 2007, ‘The conservation of industrial remains as a source of individuation and socialization’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 675–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafak, E 2010, The forty rules of love: a novel of Rumi, Viking, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L 2006, Uses of heritage, Routledge, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L, Shackel, P & Campbell, G 2011, ‘Introduction: class still matters’, in L Smith, PA Shackel & G Campbell (eds.), Heritage, labour and the working classes, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storm, A 2014, Post-industrial landscape scars, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P 1973, Taming the concrete jungle: the builders labourers’ story, New South Wales Branch of the Australian Building, Construction Employees & Builders Labourers’ Federation, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • TICCIH, P 2003, ‘The Nizhny Tagil Charter for the industrial heritage’, in TICCIH XII International Congress, pp. 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timothy, DJ & Boyd, SW 2003, Heritage tourism, Prentice Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkin, E 1995, Narrating our pasts: the social construction of oral history, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweed, C & Sutherland, M 2007, ‘Built cultural heritage and sustainable urban development’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO 1954, Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO 1972, Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO 2003, Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage ICHC.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO 2008, The operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention, World Heritage Centre/UNESCO, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO 2015, The list of industrial heritage items in the World Heritage List, viewed 22 March 2016, http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1131.

  • Urry, J 1995, Consuming places, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J 2007, Mobilities, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecco, M 2010, ‘A definition of cultural heritage: from the tangible to the intangible’, Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waitt, G 2000, ‘Consuming heritage: perceived historical authenticity’, Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 835–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterton, E & Smith, L 2009, Taking archaeology out of heritage, Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterton, E, Smith, L & Campbell, G 2006, ‘The utility of discourse analysis to heritage studies: the Burra Charter and social inclusion’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterton, E & Watson, S 2011, Heritage and community engagement: collaboration or contestation?, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, PF 2015, Industrial heritage tourism, Channel View Publications, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S 2010, Naked city: the death and life of authentic urban places, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ece Kaya .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kaya, E. (2020). Love or Hate—Preserve or Demolish: What to Do with Industrial Heritage?. In: Transformation of Sydney’s Industrial Historic Waterfront. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9668-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9668-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9667-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9668-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics