Abstract
Technological-enhanced physical environments, as well as learner-centred educational methodologies, are increasing their presence within learning spaces. The spread of physical learning environments grounded on the pedagogy-technology-space and innovative learning environments led to an increase of studies and researches on this field. We argue that physical learning environments and innovative learning environments can be approached through a multidimensional space perspective, which includes social, cultural, technological/digital and architectural dimensions. In our research, we intend to create an interior design strategy for an inclusive physical learning environments. This article presents our multidimensional space approach to innovative learning environments and physical learning environments followed by some results from in-depth interviews applied to key agents involved in Portuguese innovative learning environments. The results reveal the Euclidean space as an important factor perceived by interviewees, but the space social dimension presents a significant role for the participants, followed by the space technological/digital dimension.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Creative workshops/interviews with NEET and Migrants in order to understand their perception and conception regarding PhLE as well as video analysis of classes in ILE’s context enabling the understanding of how students and teachers occupy these spaces.
- 2.
Nevertheless, social and cultural dimension were analysed separately, in order to better understand each one.
References
Sardinha, L., Almeida, A.M.P., Pedro, N.: Bridging approaches : classroom physical space as a learning ecosystem. Interact. Des. Archit. J. 56–74 (2017)
Leahy, G.: The Modern Classroom—Strategic Insights for School Leaders. Promethean Editions, Blackburn, Lancashire (2015)
Oblinger, D.G. (ed.): Learning Spaces. Educause, Berlin, Heidelberg (2006)
OECD: The OECD Handbook for Innovative Learning Environments. OECD Publishing, Paris (2017)
Byers, T., Imms, W., Hartnell-young, E.: Comparative analysis of the impact of traditional versus innovative learning environment on student attitudes and learning outcomes. Stud. Educ. Eval. 58, 167–177 (2018)
Pedro, N.: Redesigning learning spaces : what do teachers want for future classrooms? In: International Conference Educational Technologies 2017, pp. 51–58 (2017)
Casanova, D., Mitchell, P.: Redesigning learning spaces through students and academics contributions: the role of participatory design. In: SRHE Annual Conference, p. 4. Newport (2014)
Dillenbourg, P., Sharples, M., Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Tchounikine, P., Dimitriadi, Y., Prieto, L.P., Asienso, J.I., Roschelle, J., Looi, C., Nussbaum, M., (Chile), A.D.: Trends in Orchestration. Second Research & Technology Scouting Report (2011)
Peschl, M.F., Fundneider, T.: Spaces enabling game-changing and sustaining innovations: why space matters for knowledge creation and innovation. J. Organ. Transform. Soc. Chang. 9, 41–61 (2012)
Lefebvre, H.: The Production of Space. Blackwell Inc, Oxford, UK (1991)
Bachelard, G.: The Poetics of Space. Beacon Press (1964)
Wu, X., Law, S., Heath, T., Borsi, K.: Spatial configuration shapes student social and informal learning activities in educational complexes. In: Proceedings—11th International Space Syntax Symposium SSS 2017, pp. 1–9 (2017)
Cleveland, B., Fisher, K.: The evaluation of physical learning environments: a critical review of the literature. Learn. Environ. Res. 17, 1–28 (2014)
Benade, L.: Is the classroom obsolete in the twenty-first century? Educ. Philos. Theory. 49, 796–807 (2017)
Hall, E.T.: The Hidden Dimension. Anchor Books (1990)
Bautista, G., Borges, F.: Smart classrooms: Innovation in formal learning spaces to transform learning experiences. Bull. IEEE Tech. Committeee Learn. Technol. 15, 18–21 (2013)
Alavi, H.S., Churchill, E., Kirk, D., Nembrini, J., Lalanne, D.: Deconstructing human-building interaction. Interactions 23, 60–62 (2016)
Stenglin, M.K.: Space odyssey: towards a social semiotic model of three-dimensional space. Vis. Commun. 8, 35–64 (2009)
Hillier, B.: Space is the machine. Space Syntax, London, UK (2007)
Charmaz, K.: Constructivist grounded theory. J. Posit. Psychol. 12, 299–300 (2017)
van den Akker, J.: Principles and methods of development research. In: van den Akker, J., Branch, R.M., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., Plomp, T. (eds.) Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht (1999)
Creswell, J.W.: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications, Inc (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sardinha, L., Almeida, A.M.P., Pedro, N. (2020). A Multidimensional Space Approach to Innovative Learning Environments. In: Rehm, M., Saldien, J., Manca, S. (eds) Project and Design Literacy as Cornerstones of Smart Education. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 158. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9652-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9652-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9651-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9652-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)