Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Carbon Sequestration Potential of Perennial Horticultural Crops in Indian Tropics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Carbon Management in Tropical and Sub-Tropical Terrestrial Systems

Abstract

Large numbers of horticultural crops are grown in India due to its wide variety of soil and climatic conditions. However, perennial horticultural crops have edge over annuals as they generally need low inputs such as water, energy, etc., and have high productivity values. India has large tracts of waste and marginal lands (96 million hectares of cultivable wasteland). These lands can be brought under perennial horticultural crops for successful and profitable commercial horticulture. Moreover, putting these marginal lands to perennial horticultural crops can enhance carbon sequestration and improve organic carbon content and health of the soils. This also rejuvenates degraded soils, improves the land productivity, enriches the diversity, and protects the environment. Horticultural crops have a great scope for sequestering more carbon in terrestrial ecosystem than agricultural or agroforestry systems. Studies reported that the carbon dioxide sequestration was significantly greater under the perennial crops as compared to annual crops. The carbon sequestration potential of different horticultural cropping systems ranked in the order of mango > cashew > rose > vegetable > medicinal and aromatic plants, and addition of more residues in perennial systems to soil records less emission of CO2 than annual crops. As a consequence, perennial horticulture-based systems provide economic gain through carbon credits. Enhancement of carbon sequestration in perennial systems can be attained by improving soil health and through better carbon management strategies. These include planting high-biomass-producing crops, recycling crop residue, application of manures, switching from annual to perennial crops, adopting crop rotation in place of monoculture, and promotion of agroforestry systems. This chapter mainly describes the role of perennial horticultural systems in enhancing soil carbon, soil organic matter dynamics, carbon fractions, and its assessment in horticultural systems, carbon sequestration potential of perennial horticultural crops, and also the management options available for improving C sequestration under such system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Batjes NH (1996) Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the World. Eur J Soil Sci 47:151–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagya HP, Maheswarappa HP, Surekha RB (2017) Carbon sequestration potential in coconut-based cropping systems. Indian J Hort 74(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhavya VP, Anil Kumar S, Shiva Kumar KM (2017) Land use systems to improve carbon sequestration in soils for mitigation of climate change. Int J Chem Stud 5(4):2019–2021

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield J, Pearson HL (2000) Land use, land-use change, forestry, and agricultural activities in the clean development mechanism: estimates of greenhouse gas offset potential. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 5:9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change in tropical forests: a primer. FAO forestry paper 134, FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S (2001) Measuring and monitoring carbon benefits for forest-based projects: experience from pilot projects. In: Roger A, Sedjo MT (eds) Can carbon sinks be operational? Resources for the future workshop proceedings. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner GA (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia 111:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandran P, Ray SK, Durge SL (2016) Scope of horticultural land-use system in enhancing carbon sequestration in ferruginous soils of semi-arid tropics. Curr Sci 97(7):1039–1046

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi AN (1994) Carbon sequestration through aforestation: role of tropical industrial plantations. Ambio 25(5):327–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen BT (2001) Physical fractionation of soil and structural and functional complexity in organic matter turnover. Eur J Soil Sci 52:345–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Datta A, Basak N, Chaudhari SK, Sharma DK (2015) Effect of horticultural land uses on soil properties and organic carbon distribution in a reclaimed sodic soil. J Ind Soc Soil Sci 63(3):294–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denef K, Zotarelli L, Boddey RM, Six J (2007) Microaggregate-associated carbon as a diagnostic fraction for management-induced changes in soil organic carbon in two Oxisols. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1165–1172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ecosystem Marketplace (2010) http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/carbon_Market.landing_page.php

  • Eswaran H, Van Den Berg E, Reich P, Kimble J (1995) Global soil carbon resources. In: Lal R, Kimble J, Levine E, Stewart BA (eds) Soils and global change. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganeshamurthy AN (2009) Annual report 2008–09. IIHR, Bangalore

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich EG, Beare MH, Mckim UF, Skjemstad JO (2006) Chemical and biological characteristics of physically uncomplexed organic matter. Soil Sci Soc Am J 7:975–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamburg SP (2000) Simple rules for measuring changes in ecosystem carbon in forestry-offset projects. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 5:25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagadamma S, Lal R (2010) Distribution of organic carbon in physical fractions of soils as affected by agricultural management. Biol Fertil Soils 46:543–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janiola MDC, Marin RA (2016) Carbon sequestration potential of fruit tree plantations in Southern Philippines. J Biodivers Environ Sci 8(5):164–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastrow JD, Miller RM (1997) Soil aggregate stabilization and carbon sequestration: feed backs through organo-mineral associations. In: Lal R, Kimble J, Levine E, Stewart BA (eds) Soil processes and carbon cycle. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 207–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny H (1950) Causes of high nitrogen and organic matter content of certain tropical forest soils. Soil Sci 69:63–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MG (1995) The role of soil management in sequestering soil carbon. In: Lal R (ed) Soil management and green house effect. CRC Press/Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 351–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao C, Luo Y, Fang C, Li B (2010) Ecosystem carbon stock influenced by plantation practice: implications for planting forests as a measure of climate change mitigation. PLoS One 5:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDicken KG (1997) A guide to measuring carbon storage in forestry and agroforestry projects. Forest carbon monitoring program, Winrock International, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Naitam R, Bhattacharyya T (2004) Quasi-equilibrium of organic carbon in shrink-swell soils of sub-humid tropics in India under forest, horticulture and agricultural systems. Aust J Soil Res 42:181–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nieder R, Benbi DK (2008) Carbon and nitrogen in the terrestrial environment. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palm CA, Woomer PL, Alegre J (1999) Carbon sequestration and trace gas emissions in slash-and-burn and alternative land-uses in the humid tropics. ASB climate change working group final report-phase II, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajput BS, Bhardwaj DR, Nazir AP (2017) Factors influencing biomass and carbon storage potential of different land use systems along an elevational gradient in temperate northwestern Himalaya. Agrofor Syst 91:479–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha G, Malla G (2016) Estimation of atmospheric carbon sequestration by fruit plants in mid-western terai region, Nepal. Nepal J Agric Sci 14:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K (2002) Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant Soil 241:155–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomich TP, van Noordwijk M, Budidarsono S (1998) Alternatives to slash-and-burn in Indonesia: summary report and synthesis of Phase II. ASB Indonesia report number 8, Bogor, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Verchot LV, Dutaur L, Shepherd KD, Albrecht A (2011) Organic matter stabilization in soil aggregates: understanding the biogeochemical mechanisms that determine the fate of carbon inputs in soils. Geoderma 161:182–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Li Y, Alva A (2010) Cropping systems to improve carbon sequestration for mitigation of climate change. J Environ Prot 1:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendling B, Jucksch I, Mendonca ES, Alvarenga RC (2010) Organic-matter pools of soil under pines and annual cultures. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 41:1707–1722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenberg GLB, Dorodnikov M, Kuzyakov Y (2010) Source determination of lipids in bulk soil and soil density fractions after four years of wheat cropping. Geoderma 156:267–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wise R, Cacho O (2002) A bioeconomic analysis of soil carbon sequestration in agroforests. Working paper C02, ACIAR project ASEM 1999/093

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu T, Wang Y, Yu C (2012) Carbon sequestration by fruit trees- Chinese apple orchards as an example. PLoS One 7(6):e38883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru, India

    A. N. Ganeshamurthy, D. Kalaivanan & S. Rajendiran

Authors
  1. A. N. Ganeshamurthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Kalaivanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Rajendiran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Ganeshamurthy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India

    Probir K. Ghosh

  2. Plant Animal Relationship Division, IGFRI, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Sanat Kumar Mahanta

  3. ICAR, Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India

    Debashis Mandal

  4. Agricultural Chemistry & Soil Science, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, West Bengal, India

    Biswapati Mandal

  5. Crop Production Division, Indian Grassland & Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Srinivasan Ramakrishnan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ganeshamurthy, A.N., Kalaivanan, D., Rajendiran, S. (2020). Carbon Sequestration Potential of Perennial Horticultural Crops in Indian Tropics. In: Ghosh, P., Mahanta, S., Mandal, D., Mandal, B., Ramakrishnan, S. (eds) Carbon Management in Tropical and Sub-Tropical Terrestrial Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9628-1_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation