Abstract
This chapter examines the historical development of science education in India, beginning with the policy context in pre-independence India to the present day, with a specific focus on school science education and teacher education. Specifically, this study examines the pedagogical orientation of pre-service science teachers, who had been a part of two-year Bachelor of Education teacher education program in India. They had taught middle grades science during their school internship program in different genres of schools, ranging from state-funded to private-funded during internship. Assessment items in Pedagogy of Science Teaching Test (POSTT) were used to identify their pedagogical orientations, and reasons for their specific orientations were probed through interviews. It comes out that pre-service teachers develop varying pedagogical orientations, ranging from direct instruction to open inquiry, emerging from several school-related factors like class size, availability of resources, leadership guidance; discrepancies between professional development and school culture, and other personal constraints.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1150). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Agarkar, S. C. (2017). Science education for national development: Indian perspective. In B. Akpan (Ed.), Science education: A global perspective (pp. 107–124). Switzerland: Springer.
Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1987). Teaching science. In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educators’ handbook: A research perspective (pp. 84–111). New York: Longman.
Bryan, L., & Abell, S. (1999). The development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 121–140.
Children’s Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act. (2009). http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/free_and_compulsory_NEW.pdf.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions and personal agency beliefs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Friedrichsen, P. J., Abell, S. K., Pareja, E. M., Brown, P. L., Lankford, D. M., & Volkmann, M. J. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers’ prior knowledge for teaching in and alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 357–383.
Friedrichsen, P. J., Van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95, 358–376.
Government of India (GOI). (1986). National policy on education. Ministry of Human Resource Development. Department of Education: India. Retrieved from http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NPE86-mod92.pdf.
Government of India (GOI), Ministry of Human Resource Development. (2016). National policy on education 2016. Report of the Committee for Evolution of the New Education Policy. Available from http://www.nuepa.org/New/download/NEP2016/ReportNEP.pdf.
Gupta, A. (2007). Introduction: Culture, curriculum, and points of intersection. In A. Gupta (Ed.), Going to school in South Asia (pp. 1–14). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lowery, L. F. (2002). The nature of inquiry. Science Link, 13(1), 3.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT). (1970). Education and national development: Report of the Education Commission 1964–66. (D. S. Kothari: Chairman). New Delhi: NCERT.
National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT). (2005). National curriculum framework (NCF-2005). Available from http://www.ncert.nic.in/html/pdf/schoolcurriculum/framework05/prelims.pdf.
National Council of Teacher Education (NCTE). (2009). National framework of teacher education: Towards preparing professional and humane teacher (NCFTE). Available from http://ncte-india.org/ncte_new/pdf/NCFTE_2010.pdf.
Nargund-Joshi, V., Rogers, M. A. P., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Exploring Indian secondary teachers’ orientations and practice for teaching science in an era of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 624–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20429.
O’Donoghue, T. (2007). Planning your qualitative research project: An introduction to interpretivist research in education. London and New York: Routledge.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Frels, R. (2016). Seven steps to a comprehensive literature review: A multimodal and cultural approach. USA: Sage.
Ramnarain, U., & Schuster, D. (2014). The pedagogical orientation of South African physical science teachers towards inquiry or direct instructional approaches. Research in Science Education, 44, 627–650.
Sangwan, S. (1990). Science education in India under colonial constraints, 1792–1857. Oxford Review of Education, 16(1), 81–95.
Sarangapani, P. M. (2014). Three challenges facing Indian school science education. Essays science education: Few takers for innovation. Mumbai: IKF (IRIS Knowledge Foundation). Accessed from http://www.esocialsciences.org/eSS_essay/eSS_Essay_Science_Education.aspx.
Sarukkai, S. (2014). Indian experiences with science: Considerations for history, philosophy, and science education. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1691–1717). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_53.
Schuster, D., & Cobern, W. W. (2011). Assessing pedagogical content knowledge of inquiry science instruction. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Orlando, FL, USA.
Schuster, D., Cobern, W. W., Adams, B., Skjod, B. A., Bentz, A., & Sparks, K. (2012). Case-based assessment of science teaching orientations. In American Educational Research Association National Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Schuster, D., Cobern, W. W., Applegate, B., Schwartz, R., Vellom, P., Undrieu, A., & Adams, B. (2007). Assessing pedagogical content knowledge of inquiry science teaching—Developing an assessment instrument to support the undergraduate preparation of elementary teachers to teach science as inquiry. In Proceedings of the National STEM Assessment Conference, National Science Foundation and Drury University, Washington DC. Published by Drury University.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
Zhang, B., Krajcik, J., Sutherland, L. M., Wang, L., Wu, J., & Qiang, Y. (2003). Opportunities and challenges of China’s inquiry-based education reform in middle and high school: Perspectives of science teachers and teacher educators. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 477–503.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bansal, G., Ramnarain, U., Schuster, D. (2019). Examining Pre-service Science Teachers Pedagogical Orientations in an Era of Change in India. In: Koul, R., Verma, G., Nargund-Joshi, V. (eds) Science Education in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9593-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9593-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9592-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9593-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)