Abstract
Due to accelerated evolution in sensor dependency, WSN became popular. Since the past two decades, rational amounts of work have been recognized in different areas of WSN and its improvements. As a consequence of its dynamic properties and increase in its applications, it still draws researchers’ attention to improve the quality of service. Constrained to its restricted computational capabilities and limited network capacities, it is indispensable to allocate the available resources to the critical and latency-sensitive applications in order to enhance the efficacy of these nodes. In WSNs, the role of routing is crucial and one of the most significant challenges in routing is energy consumption. The routing mechanism which drains the energy of the nodes will definitely result in poor performance. Battery life is a sensitive issue of these sensor nodes, power failure or low power can cause malfunctioning of certain nodes which in turn can create considerable topological changes and can affect the accuracy of these sensor nodes. Similarly, congestion control is another significant challenge in WSNs, which can lead to a major impact on the QoS parameters. Interference among the coexisting WSNs can cause significant variation in the link quality between the access point and a particular WSN. Consequently, affecting the performance of the WSNs. Hence, the link quality is also a considerable difficulty which must be taken into account in WSNs. By keeping the above challenges in mind, a multi-parameters-based resource allocation is contemplated in order to address all the challenges discussed above and design a comprehensive model for the resource provisioning. In order to accomplish the same, a multi-parameterized joint optimization model is proposed for WSNs which in turn leads to congestion free, energy efficient, link quality and application latency aware resource allocation network model. An algorithm is defined in order to deal with the computation complexity of the proposed model. Various simulation-based experiments are conducted in order to show the efficiency of the proposed model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
21 ideas for the 21st century. Business Week, 30 August 1999 (pp. 78–167).
Chong, C.-Y., & Kumar, S. P. (2003, August). Sensor networks: Evolution, opportunities, and challenges. Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(8), 1247–1256.
Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002, August). A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(8), 102–114.
Estrin, D., Culler, D., Pister, K., & Sukhatme, G. (2002, January). Connecting the physical world with pervasive networks. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 59–69.
Zawodniok, M., & Jagannathan, S. (2007). Predictive congestion control protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(11), 3955–3963.
Yaghmaee, M. H., & Adjeroh, D. A. (2009). Priority-based rate control for service differentiation and congestion control in wireless multimedia sensor networks. Computer Networks, 53(11), 1798–1811.
Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishna, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on System Sciences.
Kulkarni, P., Ganesan, D., & Shenoy, P. (2005). The case for multi-tier camera sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 229–238).
Goldsmith, A. J., & Wicker, S. B. (2002, August). Design challenges for energy—Constrained ad hoc wireless networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 9(4), 8–27.
Flora, J., & Kavitha, M. (2011). A survey on congestion control techniques in WSN. In Proceedings of International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical and Computer Technology (ICETECT 2011).
Chen, D., & Varshney, P. K. (2004, June). QoS support in wireless sensor networks: A survey. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Networks, Las Vegas, USA.
Smaragdakis, G., Matta, I., Bestavros, A. (2004). SEP: A stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In Second International Workshop on Sensor and Actor Network Protocols and Applications (SANPA 2004).
Younis, O., & Fahmy, S. (2004). Heed: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3, 366–379.
Yang, Y., Wu, H., & Zhuang, W. (2006). MESTER: Minimum energy spanning tree for efficient routing in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Quality.
Wang, X., & Qian, H. (2011). Hierarchical and low-power IPv6 address configuration for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Systems. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dac.1318.
Wang, S., et al. (2015). Link-correlation-aware opportunistic routing in wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(1), 47–56.
Bodas, S., Shakkottai, S., Ying, L., & Srikant, R. (2014, February). Scheduling in multichannel wireless networks: Rate function optimality in the small-buffer regime. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 60(2), 1101–1125.
Chowdhury, K. R., Nandiraju, N., Chanda, P., Agrawal, D. P., & Zeng, Q.-A. (2009, March). Channel allocation and medium access control for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 7(2), 307–321.
Ahmed, S., Javaid, N., Yousaf, S., Ahmad, A., Sandhu, M. M., Imran, M., et al. (2015). Co-LAEEBA: Cooperative link aware and energy efficient protocol for wireless body area networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1205–1215.
Shaikh, F. K., & Zeadally, S. (2016). Energy harvesting in wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 1041–1054.
Lin, S., Miao, F., Zhang, J., Zhou, G., Gu, L., He, T., et al. (2016). ATPC: Adaptive transmission power control for wireless sensor net-works. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), 12(1), 6.
Han, G., Liu, L., Jiang, J., Shu, L., & Hancke, G. (2017). Analysis of energy-efficient connected target coverage algorithms for industrial wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(1), 135–143.
Cheng, L., Niu, J., Luo, C., Shu, L., Kong, L., Zhao, Z., et al. (2018). Towards minimum-delay and energy-efficient flooding in low-duty-cycle wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks, 134, 66–77.
Fong, S., Li, J., Song, W., Tian, Y., Wong, R. K., & Dey, N. (2018). Predicting unusual energy consumption events from smart home sensor network by data stream mining with misclassified recall. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 1–25.
Mostafaei, H. (2019). Energy-efficient algorithm for reliable routing of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 66(7), 5567–5575.
Bouyssounouse, B., & Sifakis, J. (Eds.). (2005). Embedded systems design: The ARTIST roadmap for research and development (Vol. 3436). Lecture notes in computer science. Springer.
Ding, W., Tang, L., & Ji, S. (2016). Optimizing routing based on congestion control for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 22(3), 915–925.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kumari Renuka, Hemant Kumar Reddy, K. (2020). A Comprehensive Parameterized Resource Allocation Approach for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Das, S., Samanta, S., Dey, N., Kumar, R. (eds) Design Frameworks for Wireless Networks. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 82. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9574-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9574-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9573-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9574-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)