Materials and Methods

  • Liliang OuyangEmail author
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


The goal of this chapter is to better understand the bioprinting process by theoretically analyzing the correlated topics and questions. It summarizes the general criteria and research route for bioprinting. Despite numerous microextrusion bioprinting strategies developed, very little knowledge has been defined or discovered in terms of the nature of bioprinting. We believe that these strategies share some common features (e.g., one-dimensional filament as building block) that would lead to a better understanding and exploitation of this technology. This chapter will first analyze the general process of microextrusion bioprinting step by step and extract critical questions from each step. The general criteria will be subsequently concluded in terms of structural fidelity and cell protection. Based on the bioink crosslinking mechanisms, such criteria will be used to guide the design of the bioprinting process, covering the filament formation, deposition, and structure stabilization. Overall, a research route will be presented, which will be used in the subsequent case studies. Moreover, this chapter will introduce some general methods used in the study regarding rheology, 3D printability, shear stress determination, and cellular characterization.


  1. 1.
    Groll J, Boland T, Blunk T, Burdick JA, Cho DW, Dalton PD, Derby B, Forgacs G, Li Q, Mironov VA, Moroni L, Nakamura M, Shu W, Takeuchi S, Vozzi G, Woodfield TB, Xu T, Yoo JJ, Malda J (2016) Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication 8(1):013001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blaeser A, Campos DFD, Puster U, Richtering W, Stevens MM, Fischer H (2016) Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity. Adv Healthc Mater 5(3):326–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    He Y, Yang F, Zhao H, Gao Q, Xia B, Fu J (2016) Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting. Sci Rep 6:29977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chung JHY, Naficy S, Yue ZL, Kapsa R, Quigley A, Moulton SE, Wallace GG (2013) Bio-ink properties and printability for extrusion printing living cells. Biomater Sci 1(7):763–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kyle S, Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, Whitaker IS (2017) ‘Printability’ of candidate biomaterials for extrusion based 3D printing: state-of-the-art. Adv Healthc Mater 6(16)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Radhakrishnan J, Krishnan UM, Sethuraman S (2014) Hydrogel based injectable scaffolds for cardiac tissue regeneration. Biotechnol Adv 32(2):449–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP, Jungst T, Hennink WE, Dhert WJ, Groll J, Hutmacher DW (2013) 25th anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater 25(36):5011–5028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Colosi C, Shin SR, Manoharan V, Massa S, Costantini M, Barbetta A, Dokmeci MR, Dentini M, Khademhosseini A (2016) Microfluidic bioprinting of heterogeneous 3D tissue constructs using low-viscosity bioink. Adv Mater 28(4):677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yan KC, Nair K, Sun W (2010) Three dimensional multi-scale modelling and analysis of cell damage in cell-encapsulated alginate constructs. J Biomech 43(6):1031–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sung HW, Huang DM, Chang WH, Huang RN, Hsu JC (1999) Evaluation of gelatin hydrogel crosslinked with various crosslinking agents as bioadhesives: in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res 46(4):520–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rowley JA, Madlambayan G, Mooney DJ (1999) Alginate hydrogels as synthetic extracellular matrix materials. Biomaterials 20(1):45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burdick JA, Prestwich GD (2011) Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Mater 23(12):H41–H56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Novosel EC, Kleinhans C, Kluger PJ (2011) Vascularization is the key challenge in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63(4–5):300–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang T, Yan KC, Ouyang L, Sun W (2013) Mechanical characterization of bioprinted soft tissue models. Biofabrication 5(4):045010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ouyang L, Yao R, Zhao Y, Sun W (2016) Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication 8(3):035020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nair K, Gandhi M, Khalil S, Yan KC, Marcolongo M, Barbee K, Sun W (2009) Characterization of cell viability during bioprinting processes. Biotechnol J 4(8):1168–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press, Beijing and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations