Advertisement

Introduction

  • Liliang OuyangEmail author
Chapter
  • 264 Downloads
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

The applications of 3D printing (3DP) in biomedicine vary with the ink materials and thus the final products. For example, prototyping fabricated from non-biocompatible plastic could be used in surgery planning or guidance. Another example is the 3D printed implants made of biocompatible but nondegradable materials, such as titanium. One more step further, researchers have applied degradable biomaterials to print implantable scaffolds that would guide the native tissue regeneration and thus achieve the ideal repair. What this thesis presents belongs to another stage, where cells and other biological elements are directly incorporated in the 3DP process to create a living product, which is termed as 3D bioprinting. This technology is supposed to lead to organ printing in the future, which might sound crazy but is actually happening. 

References

  1. 1.
    Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32(8):773–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang S, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(5–8):1191–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, Kim DH (2016) 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv 34(4):422–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ryan GE, Pandit AS, Apatsidis DP (2008) Porous titanium scaffolds fabricated using a rapid prototyping and powder metallurgy technique. Biomaterials 29(27):3625–3635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A (2013) Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today 16(12):496–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moroni L, Boland T, Burdick JA, De Maria C, Derby B, Forgacs G, Groll J, Li Q, Malda J, Mironov VA, Mota C, Nakamura M, Shu W, Takeuchi S, Woodfield TBF, Xu T, Yoo JJ, Vozzi G (2018) Biofabrication: a guide to technology and terminology. Trends Biotechnol 36(4):384–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Langer R, Vacanti J (1993) Tissue Engineering. Science 260(5110):920–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drury JL, Mooney DJ (2003) Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 24(24):4337–4351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Griffith LG, Naughton G (2002) Tissue engineering–current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science 295(5557):1009–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mironov V, Reis N, Derby B (2006) Review: bioprinting: a beginning. Tissue Eng 12(4):631–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mironov V, Boland T, Trusk T, Forgacs G, Markwald RR (2003) Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 21(4):157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boland T, Mironov V, Gutowska A, Roth EA, Markwald RR (2003) Cell and organ printing 2: fusion of cell aggregates in three-dimensional gels. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 272(2):497–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holzl K, Lin SM, Tytgat L, Van Vlierberghe S, Gu LX, Ovsianikov A (2016) Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication 8(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Groll J, Boland T, Blunk T, Burdick JA, Cho DW, Dalton PD, Derby B, Forgacs G, Li Q, Mironov VA, Moroni L, Nakamura M, Shu W, Takeuchi S, Vozzi G, Woodfield TB, Xu T, Yoo JJ, Malda J (2016) Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication 8(1):013001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burdick JA, Prestwich GD (2011) Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Mater 23(12):H41–H56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ouyang L, Highley CB, Rodell CB, Sun W, Burdick JA (2016) 3D printing of shear-thinning hyaluronic acid hydrogels with secondary cross-linking. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2(10):1743–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ouyang L, Yao R, Zhao Y, Sun W (2016) Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication 8(3):035020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ouyang L, Highley CB, Sun W, Burdick JA (2017) A generalizable strategy for the 3D bioprinting of hydrogels from nonviscous photo-crosslinkable Inks. Adv Mater 29(8)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ouyang L, Yao R, Chen X, Na J, Sun W (2015) 3D printing of HEK 293FT cell-laden hydrogel into macroporous constructs with high cell viability and normal biological functions. Biofabrication 7(1):015010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ouyang L, Yao R, Mao S, Chen X, Na J, Sun W (2015) Three-dimensional bioprinting of embryonic stem cells directs high-throughput and highly uniform embryoid body formation. Biofabrication 7(4):044101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press, Beijing and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations