Skip to main content

Active Learning Classrooms (ALCs)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1492 Accesses

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education ((PRRE))

Abstract

Active learning classrooms (ALCs) are student-centered, technology-rich learning environments that typically feature round or curved tables with moveable seating that facilitate the use of active learning pedagogies. The growing, global popularity of the ALCs is propelled by a growing body of empirical research that demonstrates the impact of ALCs on teaching practices and student learning outcomes. This review of the literature on ALCs collects together the most important and contemporary pieces of research on these innovative classrooms from around the world and provides evidence on the impact of ALCs on student learning outcomes, layout and furniture evaluations of classroom spaces, student and instructor experiences, and informal, nonclassroom learning spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ALC:

Active Learning Classroom

LCD:

Liquid-crystal display

MIT:

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

SCALE-UP:

Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs

TBL:

Team-Based Learning

TEAL:

Technology Enabled Active Learning

TILE:

Transform, Interact, Learn, Engage

References

  • Adedokun, O. A., Parker, L. C., Henke, J. N., & Burgess, W. D. (2017). Student perceptions of a 21st century learning space. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, S., & Rao, C. (2012). Common goals, uncommon settings: The impact of physical environment on teaching and learning English for communication. Developing Country Studies, 2(9), 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alleman, N. F., Holly, L. N., & Costello, C. A. (2013). Leveraging a new building to overcome first and second-order: Barriers to faculty technology integration. Journal of Learning Spaces, 2(1), n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., Brooks, D. C., Saichaie, K., & Petersen, C. I. (2016). A guide to teaching in the active learning classroom: History, research, and practice. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beichner, R.J. (2014) History and evolution of active learning spaces. In P. Baepler, D. C. Brooks & J. D. Walker (Eds.), Active learning spaces: New directions for teaching and learning. J-B TL single issue teaching and learning (Vol. 2014, no. 137, pp. 9–16).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beichner, R., Bernold, L., Burniston, E., Dail, P., Felder, R., Gastineau, J., et al. (1999). Case study of the physics component of an integrated curriculum. American Journal of Physics, 67(S1), S16–S24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Abbott, D. S., Morse, J. J., Deardorff, D. L., Allain, R. J., et al. (2007). The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project. Research-Based Reform of University Physics, 1(1), 2–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beigi, M., & Shirmohammadi, M. (2012). Attitudes toward teamwork: Are Iranian university students ready for the workplace? Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 18(5/6), 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, A. (2017). Monitoring implementation of active learning classrooms at Lethbridge College, 2014–2015. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE—ERIC Higher Education Rep. No. 1). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. C. (2012). Space and consequences: The impact of different formal learning spaces on instructor and student behavior. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. C. & Solheim, C. (2014). Pedagogy matters, too: The impact of adapting teaching approaches to formal learning environments on student learning. In P. Baepler, D. C. Brooks & J. D. Walker (Eds.), Active learning spaces: New directions for teaching and learning. J-B TL single issue teaching and learning (Vol. 2014, no. 137, pp. 53–61).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulger, D., Gudlaugsdottir, S., Bilgin, A., & Robertson, G. (2013). Student engagement for a large unit in an active learning space. In S. Frielick, N. Buissink-Smith, P. Wyse, J. Billot, J. Hallas & E. Whitehead (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: The place of learning and teaching (Vol. 36, pp. 69–79). Auckland, New Zealand, 1–4 July 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2014). Making the case for space: The effect of Learning spaces on teaching and learning. Curriculum and Teaching, 29(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, N., & Fraser, K. (2014). Factors that shape pedagogical practices in next generation learning spaces. In K. Fraser (Ed.), The future of learning and teaching in next generational learning spaces: International perspectives on higher education research (Vol. 12, pp. 175–198). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. M., Guerin, D. A., Kim, H. Y., Brigham, J. K., & Bauer, T. (2013–14). Indoor environmental quality of classrooms and student outcomes: A path analysis approach. Journal of Learning Spaces, 2(2), n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotner, S., Loper, J., Walker, J. D., & Brooks, D. C. (2013). It’s not you, it’s the room—Are high-tech, active learning classrooms worth it? Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(6), 82–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBeck, G., & Demaree, D. (2012). Teaching assistant-student interactions in a modified SCALE-UP classroom. Physics Education Research Conference, 2011, 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okorafor, N., Jordt, H., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 111(23), 8410–8415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grajek, S. (2017). Higher education’s top 10 strategic technologies for 2017. Louisville: ECAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, E. J., & Kenyon, M. C. (2013). Classroom seating considerations for 21st century students and faculty. Journal of Learning Spaces, 2(1), n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshaw, R. G., Edwards, P. M., & Bagley, E. J. (2011). Use of swivel desks and aisle space to promote interaction in mid-sized college classrooms. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(1), n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshaw, R., & Reubens, A. (2013–14). Evaluating design enhancements to the tablet arm chair in language instruction classes at UNC Chapel Hill. Journal of Learning Spaces, 2(2), n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. C., & Epps, K. K. (2010). The impact of physical classroom environment on student satisfaction and student evaluation of teaching in the university environment. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(4), 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoellwarth, C., & Moelter, M. J. (2011). The implications of a robust curriculum in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 79(5), 540–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasry, N., Charles, E., & Whittaker, C. (2014). When teacher-centered instructors are assigned to student-centered classrooms. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 10(010116), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, J. A. (2015). Matching instructors and spaces of learning: The impact of space on behavioral, affective and cognitive learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, 4(1), n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrone, A. S., Ouimet, J. A., Siering, G., & Arthur, I. T. (2014). Coffeehouse as classroom: Examination of a new style of active learning classroom. In P. Baepler, D. C. Brooks & J. D. Walker (Eds.), Active Learning Spaces: New Directions for Teaching and Learning. J-B TL Single Issue Teaching and Learning, 2014(137), 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthyala, R. S., & Wei, W. (2013). Does space matter? Impact of classroom space on student learning in an organic-first curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 90, 45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning really work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridenour, J., Feldman, G., Teodorescu, R., Medsker, L., & Benmouna, N. (2013). Is conceptual understanding compromised by a problem-solving emphasis in an introductory physics course?. In 2012 Physics Education Research Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G. (2013). Teaching to the space: Students’ perceptions of learning following their teachers’ participation in a programme of collaborative professional development supporting teaching in the Collaborative Learning Forum. In S. Frielick, N. Buissink-Smith, P. Wyse, J. Billot, J. Hallas & E. Whitehead (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: The place of learning and teaching, (Vol. 36, pp. 404–413). Auckland, New Zealand, 1–4 July 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rook, M. M., Choi, K., & McDonald, S. P. (2015). Learning theory expertise in the design of learning spaces: Who needs a seat at the table?. Journal of Learning Spaces, 4(1), n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, D., Thomson, D. L., Fox, B., & Lam, J. (2013). Use and evaluation of a technology-rich experimental classroom. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 805–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawers, K. M., Wicks, D., Mvududu, N., Seeley, L., & Copeland, R. (2016). What drives student engagement: Is it learning space, instructor behavior, or teaching philosophy?. Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(2), n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soneral, P. A. G., & Wyse, S. A. (2017). A SCALE-UP Mock-Up: Comparison of student learning gains in high-and low-tech active-learning environments. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 16(1), n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horne, S., Murniati, C. T., Saichaie, K., Jesse, M., Florman, J. C., & Ingram, B. F. (2014). Using qualitative research to assess teaching and learning in technology-infused TILE classrooms. In P. Baepler, D. C. Brooks, & J. D. Walker (Eds.), Active Learning Spaces: New Directions for Teaching and Learning. J-B TL Single Issue Teaching and Learning, 2014(137), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walczak, M. M., & Van Wylen, D. G. L. (2013–14). Tiered classrooms at St. Olaf College: Faculty and student perceptions of three different designs. Journal of Learning Spaces, 2(2), n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, A., Brooks, D. C., & Walker, J. D. (2010). Making the case for space: Three years of empirical research on formal and informal learning environments. Educause Quarterly, 33(3). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/making-case-space-three-years-empirical-research-learning-environments.

  • Yang, J., Yu, H., Gong, C., & Chen, N. S. (2017). Students’ perceptions and behaviour in technology-rich classroom and multi-media classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 621–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Christopher Brooks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brooks, D.C. (2019). Active Learning Classrooms (ALCs). In: Yu, S., Niemi, H., Mason, J. (eds) Shaping Future Schools with Digital Technology. Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9439-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9439-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9438-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9439-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics