Abstract
The development of the bioeconomy, including biotechnology, has significant meaning for many regions in the European Union. Nineteen member states already have a bioeconomy strategy (or a similar strategic document) in place or are in the process of developing a strategy (Haarich S, Bioeconomy development in EU regions: mapping of EU Member States/regions’ research and innovation plans and strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3) on bioeconomy. Final Report, Framework Contract: 2014.CE.16.BAT Lot 2. Specific Contract: RTD/F1/PP-03681-2015. European Commission, Brussels, 2017). Currently, the development of science and technology creates new opportunities that make bioeconomy one of the most dynamic sectors in the European economy. Biotechnology has the greatest potential impact in the sectors of agriculture, health and industry. The global human population is estimated to reach nine billion people by 2050, which creates a serious challenge for achieving global food security and adequate responses to the effects of climate change. Progress may be achieved by applying knowledge of molecular and genetic mechanisms to create or improve agricultural processes and food production. This chapter aims to review current knowledge on agri-biotechnology, within the context of the legal and economic aspects of using GMOs (genetically modified organisms). The area of GM crops in EU countries in 2017 was marginal. GM plants were cultivated in a few EU countries: Spain (0.1 million hectares), Portugal (less than 0.1 million hectares) and marginally in Slovakia and Czech Republic. As a consequence, EU countries import raw materials and GM products from other countries. Finally, we highlight the legal aspects of using GM plants in agriculture, including GM products that are registered as food and feed. In the last chapter, we present perspectives on the development of the bioeconomy and biotechnology in the European Union.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aboy M, Liddicoat J, Liddell K, Jordan M, Crespo C (2017) After Myriad, what makes a gene patent claim “markedly different” from nature? Nat Biotechnol 35:820–825
Aguilar A, Wohlgemuth R, Twardowski T (2018) Perspectives on bioeconomy. New Biotechnol 40:181–184
BIOEAST (2018) Central and Eastern European initiative for knowledge-based agriculture, aquaculture and forestry in the bioeconomy. http://www.bioeast.com. Accessed 5 Jan 2019
Bioeconomy Knowledge Centre (2016) Infographic on jobs and growth of the bioeconomy 2015. https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/sites/know4pol/files/2018_09_01_bioeconomi_infographic_update_en.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2018
BiomassWeb (2018) Improving food security in Africa through increased system productivity of biomass-based value webs. https://biomassweb.org/. Accessed 1 Jan 2019
Biooekonomierat (2018) International bioeconomy strategies. http://biooekonomierat.de/en/international/. Accessed 1 Feb 2019
Castellari E, Soregaroli C, Venus TJ, Wesseler J (2018) Food processor and retailer non-GMO standards in the US and EU and the driving role of regulations. Food Policy 78:26–37
Court of Justice of the European Union (2018) Judgment in case C-528/16 confédération paysanne and Others v Premier minister and Ministre de l’Agriculture, de l’Agroalimentaire et de la Forêt. Court of Justice of the European Union
Custers R (2017) The regulatory status of gene-edited agricultural products in the EU and beyond. Emerg Top Life Sci 1:221–229
Directive 2015/412 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 amending Directive 2001/18/EC as regards the possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their territory
EBCL (2016) Lodz declaration of bioregions. http://scanbalt.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/LODZ-BIOCOMMUNITIES-DECLARATIONfinalEN6.pdf. Accessed 01 Jan 2019
EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (2010) Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA J 8:1879
ELAW (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. ELAW, Oregon
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2012) Towards the circular economy. EMAF, Cowes
EU GMO Registry (2019) Genetically modified organisms. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/dyna/gm_register/index_en.cfm. Accessed 14 Jan 2019
Eurobarometer (2010) Biotechnology: special eurobarometer 341. TNS Opinion & Social, Brussells
European Commission (1998) MON-00810-6 EU register of genetically modified food and feed. http://ec.europa.eu/food/dyna/gm_register/gm_register_auth.cfm?pr_id=11. Accessed 16 Sept 2018
European Commission (2005) New perspectives on the knowledge-based bio-economy. European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2010) The knowledge based bio-economy (KBBE) in Europe: achievements and challenges. European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2012) Innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe. European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2015) Closing the loop: an EU action plan for the Circular Economy. European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2016a) Closing the loop: new circular economy package. European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels
European Commission (2016b) Genetically modified commodities in the EU. European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2018a) The commission’s plan for plastics. Plastic in a circular economy. https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/research-area/environment/plastics-circular-economy_en. Accessed 1 Feb 2019
European Commission (2018b) Directorate-general for research and innovation. Food 2030. European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2018c) The international bioeconomy forum. https://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/index.cfm?pg=policy&lib=ibf. Accessed 19 Dec 2018
European Commission (2018d) A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. European Commission, Brussels
European Commission Database (2018) A new bioeconomy strategy for a sustainable Europe. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-6067_en.htm. Accessed 12 Dec 2018
European Union (2007) En route to the knowledge-based bio-economy KBBE. https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Cologne_Paper-p-20000945.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2018
European Union (2017) Latvian bioeconomy strategy 2030. http://www.llu.lv/sites/default/files/2018-07/Latvian-Bioeconomy-Strategy-Summary-WEB_0.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2018
Fabbri K (2017) Food 2030. EU research and innovation for tomorrow’s nutrition and food systems. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/nutrition_physical_activity/docs/ev_20171129_co04_en.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2019
Falzone J (2018) Nobel prize-winning chemists: misguided GMO fears could hinder technology’s societal benefits. http://www.biotech-now.org/food-and-agriculture/2018/12/nobel-prize-winning-chemists-misguided-gmo-fears-could-hinder-technologys-societal-benefits. Accessed 1 Jan 2019
FAO (2003) Trade reforms and food security, conceptualizing the linkages. http://www.fao.org/3/a-y4671e.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2019
FAO (2009) The state of food insecurity in the world 2009. FAO, Rome
FEFAC (2015) Economic impact assessment on the European GM authorisation “opt-out” proposal. FEFAC, Brussels
German Bioeconomy Council (2015) Bioeconomy policy (Part II): synopsis of national strategies around the world. Office of the German Bioeconomy Council, Berlin
Haarich S (2017) Bioeconomy development in EU regions: mapping of EU Member States/regions’ research and innovation plans and strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3) on bioeconomy, Final Report, Framework Contract: 2014.CE.16.BAT Lot 2. Specific Contract: RTD/F1/PP-03681-2015. European Commission, Brussels
Hall J, Matos S, Gold S, Severino LS (2018) The paradox of sustainable innovation: the ‘Eroom’ effect (Moore’s law backwards). J Clean Prod 172:3487–3497
Hilgartner S (2007) Making the bioeconomy measurable: politics of an emerging anticipatory machinery. BioSocieties 2:382–386
ISAAA (2018) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2017: biotech crop adoption surges as economic benefits accumulate in 22 years, ISAAA Brief No. 53. ISAAA, Ithaca
ISAAA (2019a) Chinese agri ministry approves import of 5 GM crops. http://www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/article/default.asp?ID=17146. Accessed 10 Jan 2019
ISAAA (2019b) GM approval database. http://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/advsearch/default.asp?CropID=Any&TraitTypeID=Any&DeveloperID=Any&CountryID=Any&ApprovalTypeID=Any. Accessed 14 Jan 2019
JUSTIA (2013) Association for molecular pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/569/576/. Accessed 15 Jan 2019
Korhonen J, Honkasalo A, Seppälä J (2018) Circular economy: the concept and its limitations. Ecol Econ 143:37–46
Krön M, Bittner U (2015) Danube soya – improving European GM-free soya supply for food and feed. OCL 22:D509
Macahilo MM (2018) GMO labeling laws per country. https://globalfoodsafetyresource.com/gmo-labeling-laws/. Accessed 1 Jan 2019
Maciejczak M, Hofreiter K (2013) How to define bioeconomy? Ann Pol Assoc Agric Agribus Econ 15:243–248
Martinez J (1998) Genomics and the world’s economy. Science 281:925–926
McCormick K, Kautto N (2013) The bioeconomy in Europe: an overview. Sustainability 5:2589–2608
OECD (2009) The bioeconomy to 2030: designing a policy agenda. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/the-bioeconomy-to-2030_9789264056886-en. Accessed 20 Dec 2018
Osmakova A, Kirpichnikov M, Popov V (2018) Recent biotechnology developments and trends in the Russian Federation. New Biotechnol 40:76–81
Paarlberg D, Paarlberg P (2008) The agricultural revolution of the 20th century. Iowa State University Press, Ames
Patermann C, Aguilar A (2018) The origins of the bioeconomy in the European Union. New Biotechnol 40:20–24
Patermann C, Slusarczyk H (2009) The knowledge-based bio-economy – from concept to practice: experiences in Germany and Europe. http://www.owwz.de/fileadmin/Biotechnologie/BioVeranst/Novosibirsk_2009/Patermann.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2018
Paull J (2018) Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) as invasive species. J Environ Prot Sustain Dev 4:31–37
Plastic Europe (2016) Association of plastics manufacturers. www.plasticseurope.org.eu. Accessed 27 Dec 2018
Potrykus I (2017) The GMO-crop potential for more, and more nutritious food is blocked by unjustified regulation. J Innov Knowl 2:90–96
Regulation-EC (2003) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 september 2003 on genetically modified food and feed (Text with EEA relevance)
Ricroch A, Chopra S, Fleischer SJ (2014) Plant biotechnology. Springer, Cham
Schmidt O, Padel S, Levidow L (2012) The bio-economy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective. Bio-based Appl Econ 1:47–63
Sherrington C, Darrah C, Hann S, Cole G, Corbin M (2016) Study to support the development of measures to combat a range of marine litter sources. Report for European Commission DG Environment. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/marine/good-environmental-status/descriptor-10/pdf/MSFD%20Measures%20to%20Combat%20Marine%20Litter.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
Singh HB, Jha A, Keswani C (eds) (2016a) Intellectual property issues in biotechnology. CABI, Wallingford. 304 pages. ISBN:9781780646534
Singh HB, Jha A, Keswani C (2016b) Biotechnology in agriculture, medicine and industry: an overview. In: Singh HB, Jha A, Keswani C (eds) Intellectual property issues in biotechnology. CABI, Wallingford, pp 1–4
Singh HB, Keswani C, Singh SP (2019) Intellectual property issues in microbiology. Springer, Singapore. 425 pages. ISBN:9789811374654
Smart RD, Blum M, Wesseler J (2017) Trends in approval times for genetically engineered crops in the United States and the European Union. J Agric Econ 68:182–198
Smyth SJ, McDonald J, Falck-Zepeda J (2014) Investment, regulation, and uncertainty: managing new plant breeding techniques. GM Crops Food 5:44–57
The Non-GMO Project (2018) Non-GMO project standard. https://www.nongmoproject.org/product-verification/the-standard-2-2/. Accessed 3 Jan 2019
Tyczewska A, Woźniak E, Gracz J, Kuczyński J, Twardowski T (2018) Towards food security: current state and future prospects of agrobiotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 36:1219–1229
USDA (2018) BE disclosure. https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/be. Accessed 10 Jan 2019
UW News (2018) Researchers develop a new houseplant that can clean your home’s air. https://www.washington.edu/news/2018/12/19/new-houseplant-can-clean-air/?utm_source=UW%20News&utm_medium=tile&utm_campaign=UW%20NEWS. Accessed 27 Dec 2018
von Braun J (2015) Bioeconomy – science and technology policy to harmonize biologization of economies with food security. In: Sahn D (ed) The fight against hunger and malnutrition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 240–262
von Braun J (2018) Bioeconomy – the global trend and its implications for sustainability and food security. Glob Food Secur 19:81–83
Wreford A, Bayne K, Edwards P, Renwick A (2018) Enabling a transformation to a bioeconomy in New Zealand. Environ Innov Soc Transit. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.11.005
Zhang L, Routsong R, Strand SE (2019) Greatly enhanced removal of volatile organic carcinogens by a genetically modified houseplant, pothos ivy (Epipremnum aureum) expressing the mammalian cytochrome P450 2e1 gene. Environ Sci Technol 53:325–331
Zilberman D, Holland GT, Trilnick I (2018) Agricultural GMOs—what we know and where scientists disagree. Sustainability 10:1514
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Centre, Poland (nos. 2012/06/A/NZ9/00125 and 2014/15/B/NZ9/02312), and by funding from the ERANET-CORNET #22/87/2017 research project named “Innovative processing technology of rapeseed products for poultry nutrition” and was co-funded by the National Centre for Research and Development and the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland by the KNOW programme.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woźniak, E., Zimny, T., Twardowski, T. (2020). Agri-biotechnology: Legal and Economic Aspects of Using GMOs in EU. In: Keswani, C. (eds) Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9431-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9431-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9430-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9431-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)