Skip to main content

How Leader’s Proclivity and Internal Communication Affect Rural Employees’ Attitude?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 257 Accesses

Abstract

Unfavourable organizational environment adversely affect employees’ attitude, that is, job satisfaction and commitment. The purpose of the present paper is to empirically explore the impact of leaders’ proclivity and internal communication on rural employees’ job attitude (satisfaction and commitment) at urban workplaces in higher education sector in Northern India. The data were collected from 52 non-teaching ruralites (staff) working in the 30 teaching departments of University of Jammu, Jammu. The data was analysed using Partial Least Squares (PLS) research technique. Results reveal that leaders’ proclivity and internal communication significantly influence employees’ job satisfaction and commitment. Employees’ contribution towards the sustainability and progress of organization should not be taken for granted or ignored. Leaders must adopt positive attitude towards employees by nurturing them and taking care of needs and requirements of non-teaching along with teaching staff members. All such practices that aid internal communication process effectively must be developed and encouraged so that employees remain committed and satisfied at work place. This research paper presents for the first time the impact of higher authorities’ proclivity on employees’ job attitude, and that too focusing on the rural background of employees working in the higher education sector of North India. Study is cross-sectional in nature. Future researchers can conduct the longitudinal study and incorporate more antecedents, consequences, moderators and mediators in the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allard-Poesi, F., & Hollet-Haudebert, S. (2017). The Sound of Silence: Measuring Suffering at Work. Human Relations, 70(12), 1442–1463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ampofo, E. Y. (2016). Immediate Supervisors’ Leadership Behaviour and Employees’ Organizational Commitment: Do Pay and Promotion Mediate the Nexus? International Journal of Business and Social Research, 6(8), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, F., & Bramble, T. (2017). Silence as a Survival Strategy: Will the Silent Be Worse Off? A Study of Chinese Migrant Workers in Guangdong. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1328609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asrar-ul-Haq, M., & Kuchinke, K. P. (2016). Impact of Leadership Styles on Employees’ Attitude Towards Their Leader and Performance: Empirical Evidence from Pakistani Banks. Future Business Journal, 2(1), 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babin, B. J., & Boles, J. S. (1996). The Effects of Perceived Co-worker Involvement and Supervisor Support on Service Provider Role Stress, Performance and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 72(1), 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambacas, M., & Patrickson, M. (2008). Interpersonal Communication Skills that Enhance Organizational Commitment. Journal of Communication Management, 12(1), 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriere, J., & Bourque, C. (2009). The Effects of Organizational Communication on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in a Land Ambulance Service and the Mediating Role of Communication Satisfaction. Career Development International, 14(1), 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. C., Beck, S. L., & Amos, L. K. (2005). Leadership Styles and Nursing Faculty Job Satisfaction in Taiwan. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(4), 374–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedahanov, A. T., Lee, D., Rhee, J., & Yusupov, S. (2016). An Examination of the Associations Among Cultural Dimensions, Relational Silence and Stress. Personnel Review, 45(3), 593–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modelling. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkutlu, H., & Chafra, J. (2019). Leader Machiavellianism and Follower Silence: The Mediating Role of Relational Identification and the Moderating Role of Psychological Distance. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 28(3), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenter, H., Schreurs, B., Van Emmerik, I. J., & Sun, S. (2017). What Does It Take to Break the Silence in Teams: Authentic Leadership and/or Proactive Followership? Applied Psychology, 66(1), 49–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatipoglu, B., & Inelmen, K. (2017). Demographic Diversity in the Workplace and Its Impact on Employee Voice: The Role of Trust in the Employer. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1322120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS Path Modeling in New Technology Research: Updated Guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., Vliert, E. V., & Vegt, G. V. (2005). Breaking the Silence Culture: Stimulation of Participation and Employee Opinion Withholding Cross-Nationally. Management and Organization Review, 1(3), 459–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. A., Yu, W., & Chavez, R. (2016). The Effect of Internal Communication and Employee Satisfaction on Supply Chain Integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., & Kelly, D. (2014). Deafening Silence? Time to Reconsider Whether Organization Are Silent or Deaf When Things Go Wrong. BMJ Quality and Safety, 23(9), 709–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2018). Empowering Leadership: Leading People to Be Present Through Affective Organizational Commitment? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1424017.

  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., & Edmondson, A. C. (2009). Silenced by Fear: The Nature, Sources, and Consequences of Fear at Work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.07.002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madlock, P. E. (2008). The Link Between Leadership Style, Communicator Competence, and Employee Satisfaction. The Journal of Business Communication, 45(1), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Men, L. R. (2014). Strategic Internal Communication: Transformational Leadership, Communication Channels, and Employee Satisfaction. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 264–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World. Review Academy of Management, 25(4), 706–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobile, J. (2017). Organisational Communication and Its Relationships with Job Satisfaction and Organisational Commitment of Primary School Staff in Western Australia. Educational Psychology, 37(3), 380–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orpen, C. (1997). The Interactive Effects of Communication Quality and Job Involvement on Managerial Job Satisfaction and Work Motivation. The Journal of Psychology, 131(5), 519–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. H., Carter, M. Z., DeFrank, R. S., & Deng, Q. (2016). Abusive Supervision, Psychological Distress, and Silence: The Effects of Gender Dissimilarity Between Supervisors and Subordinates. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3384-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, C. C., & Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee Silence: Quiescence and Acquiescence as Responses to Perceived Injustice. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 20, pp. 331–369). New York: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruppel, C. P., & Harrington, S. J. (2000). The Relationship of Communication, Ethical Work Climate, and Trust to Commitment and Innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(4), 313–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, P., & Frankwick, G. L. (2011). Environment, Management Attitude and Organizational Learning in Alliances. Management Decision, 49(1), 156–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W., Butts, M. M., Vandenberg, R. J., Joy, D. M., & Wilson, M. G. (2006). Effects of Management Communication, Opportunity for Learning, and Work Schedule Flexibility on Organizational Commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 474–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakola, M., & Bouradas, D. (2005). Antecedents and Consequences of Organisational Silence: An Empirical Investigation. Employee Relations, 27(5), 441–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359–1392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuuren, M., Jong, M. D., & Seydel, E. R. (2007). Direct and Indirect Effects of Supervisor Communication on Organizational Commitment. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12(2), 116–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramani, V., Zhou, L., Wang, M., Liao, H., & Shi, J. (2016). Social Networks and Employee Voice: The Influence of Team Members’ and Team Leaders’ Social Network Positions on Employee Voice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 132, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Obhdp.2015.12.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willman, P., Bryson, A., & Gomez, R. (2006). The Sound of Silence: Which Employers Choose ‘no voice’ and Why? Socio-Economic Review, 4(2), 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. K. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using Smart PLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, A. J., Loi, R., & Lam, L. W. (2015). The Bad Boss Takes It All: How Abusive Supervision and Leader–Member Exchange Interact to Influence Employee Silence. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 763–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousef, D. A. (2000). Organizational Commitment: A Mediator of the Relationships of Leadership Behavior with Job Satisfaction and Performance in a Non-western Country. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(1), 6–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

 

Leader’s Proclivity (L PR)

LP1.

Your HOD encourages employees (non-teaching staff) to express their disagreements regarding department issues.

LP2.

In this department, employees (non-teaching staff) feel free to express themselves.

LP3.

If you disagree on departmental issues, you will not be considered as troublemaker by the HOD.

LP4.

If you express your disagreement regarding departmental issues you may not suffer negative results from the HOD.

LP5.

If you disagree on departmental issues, it will not be considered as lack of loyalty by the HOD.

 

Internal Communication (I COM)

IC1.

Communication with colleagues from other departments is satisfactory in terms of getting a response.

IC2.

There is a systematic and organised exchange of knowledge and experiences among non-teaching staff members in this department.

IC3.

There is adequate communication between non-teaching staff members and HOD of this department.

IC4.

Changes in the department are communicated adequately to the non-teaching staff members.

IC5.

The main members in the department keep non-teaching staff informed regarding its mission, plans and progress. You prepare your employees (non-teaching staff) to perform well.

 

Job Commitment (J COM)

JC 1.

You would not like to shift, if you get an opportunity to work in other departments.

JC2.

You believe that the department’s values and your values are similar.

JC 3.

You feel proud to say that you work in the present department.

JC 4.

This department encourages you to put maximum effort in order to give more output.

JC 5.

You are highly satisfied with your choice to work for this department in comparison with other opportunities you had before looking for this job.

 

Job Satisfaction (J SAT)

JS 1.

You are satisfied regarding training opportunities given in the department.

JS 2.

You are satisfied with the rewards/appreciations given in comparison to your performance.

JS 3.

You are satisfied with the opportunities given for promotion.

JS 4.

You are satisfied with your overall job in the department.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chahal, H., Sethi, S. (2020). How Leader’s Proclivity and Internal Communication Affect Rural Employees’ Attitude?. In: Chahal, H., Pereira, V., Jyoti, J. (eds) Sustainable Business Practices for Rural Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9298-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics