Skip to main content

Sensorineural Hearing Loss Identification via Discrete Wavelet Packet Entropy and Cat Swarm Optimization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applied Nature-Inspired Computing: Algorithms and Case Studies

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Nature-Inspired Computing ((STNIC))

Abstract

(Aim) Currently, there are many methods to identify sensorineural hearing loss via magnetic resonance imaging. This study aims to develop a more efficient approach. (Methods) Our approach used discrete wavelet packet entropy as the feature-extraction method. It used single-hidden layer feedforward neural network as the classifier model. A bio-inspired algorithm, cat swarm optimization (CSO) is employed to train the weights/biases of this neural network. (Results) Simulation results showed our approach achieved an overall accuracy of 92.33%. Besides, this cat swarm optimization method gives better performance than genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, firefly algorithm, chaotic simulated annealing, and adaptive genetic algorithm. The whole hearing loss identification system yields greater accuracy than three state-of-the-art methods. It costs 102.8 ms to predict a new brain image. (Conclusion) The discrete wavelet packet entropy is an efficient feature-extraction method for detecting hearing loss. The CSO algorithm may be applied in other optimization problems.

# Shui-Hua Wang, Ming Yang, Yu-Dong Zhang are contributed equally to this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shah, J., et al. (2018). Evaluating diagnostic yield of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pediatric unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 115, 41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chao, T. N., et al. (2018). How old is too old for cochlear implantation for congenital bilateral sensorineural hearing loss? Laryngoscope, 128(10), 2221–2222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tarabichi, O., et al. (2018). Diffusion tensor imaging of central auditory pathways in patients with sensorineural hearing loss: A systematic review. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 158(3), 432–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ren, H. M., et al. (2017). Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 10(4), 6613–6621.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carta, F., et al. (2017). Metabolomic analysis of urine with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A preliminary study. Auris, Nasus, Larynx, 44(4), 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shiell, M. M., et al. (2016). The right hemisphere planum temporale supports enhanced visual motion detection ability in deaf people: evidence from cortical thickness. Neural Plasticity. Article ID 7217630.

    Google Scholar 

  7. O’Bryant, M. W., et al. (2018). T2-weighted MRI screening algorithm for patients with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 39(6), 800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, M., et al. (2014). Brain structural and functional alterations in patients with unilateral hearing loss. Hearing Research, 316, 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira, A. (2017). Hu Moment invariant: A new method for hearing loss detection. Advances in Engineering Research, 153, 412–416.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nayeem, A. (2017). Hearing loss detection based on wavelet entropy and genetic algorithm. Advances in Intelligent Systems Research, 153, 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, Y., et al. (2018). Hearing loss identification based on stationary wavelet transform, principal component analysis and kernel support vector machine. Advances in Computer Science and Applications, 5(2), 587–590.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Du, S. (2017). Hearing loss detection in medical multimedia data by discrete wavelet packet entropy and single-hidden layer neural network trained by adaptive learning-rate back propagation. In 14th International Symposium on Neural Networks (ISNN). (pp. 541–549). Sapporo Japan: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, B. (2017). Preliminary study on unilateral sensorineural hearing loss identification via dual-tree complex wavelet transform and multinomial logistic regression. In Ferrández Vicente J. M. et al., (Eds.) Natural and artificial computation for biomedicine and neuroscience, Springer International Publishing: Cham. pp. 289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jia, W., Three-category classification of magnetic resonance hearing loss images based on deep autoencoder. Journal of Medical Systems 41. Article ID. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leshno, M., et al. (1993). Multilayer feedforward networks with a nonpolynomial activation function can approximate any function. Neural Networks, 6(6), 861–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hong, J. (2018). Sensorineural hearing loss identification via nine-layer convolutional neural network with batch normalization and dropout. Multimedia Tools and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6798-3.

  17. Ghasemzadeh, P., et al. (2019). Classification of sleep stages based on LSTAR model. Applied Soft Computing, 75, 523–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Avila, N. F., et al. (2018). NTL detection in electric distribution systems using the maximal overlap discrete wavelet-packet transform and random undersampling boosting. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33(6), 7171–7180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, P., et al. (2017). Pathological brain detection via wavelet packet Tsallis entropy and real-coded biogeography-based optimization. Fundamenta Informaticae, 151(1–4), 275–291.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, H. S., et al. (2018). The multi-level and multi-dimensional quantum wavelet packet transforms. Scientific Reports 8, 23: Article ID. 13884.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Azergui, M., et al. (2018). A teager-kaiser energy operator and wavelet packet transform for bearing fault detection. Smart Science, 6(3), 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, Y. (2018). Wavelet energy entropy and linear regression classifier for detecting abnormal breasts. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(3), 3813–3832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fan, W. T., et al. (2018). Entropy-based variational Bayes learning framework for data clustering. IET Image Processing, 12(10), 1762–1772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng, J. D., et al. (2018). Sigmoid-based refined composite multiscale fuzzy entropy and t-SNE based fault diagnosis approach for rolling bearing. Measurement, 129, 332–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chaudhry, H., et al. (2018). Multi scale entropy based adaptive fuzzy contrast image enhancement for crowd images. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(12), 15485–15504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shahbaz, M., et al. (2019). Artificial neural network approach for the steam gasification of palm oil waste using bottom ash and CaO. Renewable Energy, 132, 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Najafi, S., et al. (2019). Pavement friction management—artificial neural network approach. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20(2), 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nazmi, N., et al. (2019). Walking gait event detection based on electromyography signals using artificial neural network. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 47, 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brar, L. S., et al. (2018). Analysis and optimization of cyclone separators with eccentric vortex finders using large eddy simulation and artificial neural network. Separation and Purification Technology, 207, 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nilanjan, D. (Ed.) (2018). Advancements in Applied Metaheuristic Computing. 2018, IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, pp. 1–335.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Raju, P., et al. (2018). Grey wolf optimization-based artificial neural network for classification of kidney images. Journal of Circuits Systems and Computers 27(14), 21: Article ID. 1850231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Conde-Gutierrez, R. A., et al. (2018). Optimal multivariable conditions in the operation of an absorption heat transformer with energy recycling solved by the genetic algorithm in artificial neural network inverse. Applied Soft Computing, 72, 218–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Aalizadeh, B., et al. (2018). Combination of particle swarm optimization algorithm and artificial neural network to propose an efficient controller for vehicle handling in uncertain road conditions. Neural Computing and Applications, 30(2), 585–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Savargave, S. B., et al. (2018). Modeling and optimizing boiler design using neural network and firefly algorithm. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 27(3), 393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiao, S. B., et al. Assessment of leakage degree of underground heating primary pipe network based on chaotic simulated annealing neural network. In Chinese Automation Congress, 2017. Jinan, China: IEEE. pp. 5895–5900.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Eslami, P., et al. (2017). Predicting tanker freight rates using parsimonious variables and a hybrid artificial neural network with an adaptive genetic algorithm. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 19(3), 538–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chu, S. C., et al. (2006). Cat Swarm Optimization. in 9th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI). 2006. Guilin, P R China: Springer, Berlin. pp. 854–858.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Banerjee, S., et al. (2018). Array pattern optimization for steerable circular isotropic antenna array using cat swarm optimization algorithm. Wireless Personal Communications, 99(3), 1169–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gabi, D., et al. (2018). Hybrid cat swarm optimization and simulated annealing for dynamic task scheduling on cloud computing environment. Journal of Information and Communication Technology-Malaysia, 17(3), 435–467.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Qian, P. (2018). Cat Swarm Optimization applied to alcohol use disorder identification. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(17), 22875–22896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim, J. Y., et al., (2018). Can an average of thresholds at 2 kHz and 4 kHz substitute for the threshold at 3 kHz in pure tone audiometry? A study based on the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2012. PLoS ONE, 13(8), 10: Article ID. e0201867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chokphoemphun, S., et al. (2018). Moisture content prediction of paddy drying in a fluidized-bed drier with a vortex flow generator using an artificial neural network. Applied Thermal Engineering, 145, 630–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tsai, P. W., et al. (2013) Review on cat swarm optimization algorithms. In 3rd International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (pp. 564–567). Xianning, China: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Digital Publishing Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shuai Liu or Yu-Dong Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, SH., Yang, M., Liu, S., Zhang, YD. (2020). Sensorineural Hearing Loss Identification via Discrete Wavelet Packet Entropy and Cat Swarm Optimization. In: Dey, N., Ashour, A., Bhattacharyya, S. (eds) Applied Nature-Inspired Computing: Algorithms and Case Studies. Springer Tracts in Nature-Inspired Computing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9263-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics